She's the best there is right now. In my opinion, of course.Originally posted by purplelucrezia+Mar 4th, 2004 - 11:50 pm--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(purplelucrezia @ Mar 4th, 2004 - 11:50 pm)</div><div class='quotemain'> <!--QuoteBegin-pearsandapples@Mar 4th, 2004 - 1:55 pm
![]()
![]()
![]()
i LOVE cate blanchett... but she is NO kate hepburn.
how can she even be cast to play her?????
![]()
![]()
![]()
Who else would you want to play her? [/b][/quote]
in all honesty?
i would rather not see kate as a subject in another miserable film by the now master of cheesy films: martin scorsese
that is all.
cate blanchett is my favorite actress in hollywood today... but i just don't see her as kate. jmo though. i can't even begin to understand martin and the new call to make a 1/2 latino woman, into a black female. i mean, how bizarre is that?

The fact that it's actually a good movie is more important to me... 
Nowadays, lots of people go out to watch or rent a movie just because it's a huge blockbuster hit, it's popular, boasts a star studded cast and it contains stunning visual effects (and you know what I am talking about : awfull productions like all the infamous J.Lo movies.....).
so here it is
already started ! i have already have my tickets for " MARTIN SCORSESE PRESENTS :BLUES " section .