Tom Hanks To Star In Da Vinci Code | the Fashion Spot

Tom Hanks To Star In Da Vinci Code

The duo behind 'A Beautiful Mind' have picked a star for their 'Da Vinci' adaptation. A NEWSWEEK exclusive
By Devin Gordon
Newsweek

Nov. 22 issue - One of the virtues of "The Da Vinci Code," author Dan Brown's gajillion-selling thriller about a Harvard symbologist in hot pursuit of the Holy Grail, is its breathlessness. The novel unfolds over the course of 12 hours, and that's about how long it takes to read. It's fitting, then, that the man spearheading the movie version, producer Brian Grazer, first got wind of the book from the creator of his company's acclaimed TV series "24"—itself an adrenaline rush of real-time pulp fiction. Early in 2003, Joel Surnow read the book, which was popular but not yet a worldwide phenomenon, and thought it would make a terrific story line for "24's" third season. So he asked his boss to look into acquiring the rights. "It quickly became clear that we had no chance," Grazer says. Brown had no intention of handing over his book to a mere TV show. Wise move. A few months later Sony paid $6 million for the movie rights—and hired Grazer to produce it. One of Hollywood's shrewdest operators, Grazer, 53, had started out trolling for TV material and ended up piloting the biggest film adaptation since "Harry Potter."

advertisement
Now, NEWSWEEK has learned, Grazer and director Ron Howard, the Oscar-winning duo behind "A Beautiful Mind," have settled on an actor to play "The Da Vinci Code's" lead role of globe-trotting scholar Robert Langdon. Perhaps you've heard of him: Tom Hanks. Grazer and Howard helped make Hanks a star with their 1984 comedy "Splash"; they rehired him 11 years later for "Apollo 13," which earned the filmmakers their first best-picture nomination. But Howard insists that friendship alone doesn't explain Hanks's casting. Much of the action in "The Da Vinci Code" is cerebral—solving riddles, cracking codes. At one point, there's even a heart-stopping Boolean keyword search at a London library. "Tom is an exciting actor to watch thinking," Howard says. "We probably don't need his status from a box-office standpoint"—by now, "The Da Vinci Code" sells itself—"but he gives Langdon instant legitimacy."
 
i did love the book, and i think tom hanks is a terrific actor.
brilliant combination, IMO!
 
I like Tom Hanks, but he's not Langdon to me. I don't underestimate his acting ability, but AESTHETICALLY speaking he's not Langdon to me, at all. I was thinking more of someone who looked like Sam Neill or something.

But I'll have to see...
 
can't wait to see it :woot: Tom Hanks doesn't exactly fit to the picture of Langdon in my mind either, but he's such a great actor I'm sure he'll pull it off :flower:
 
I love the Da Vinci Code, really wonder what the movie will be like :)
 
I love the book... I just hope they choose the right actors & director for the film. I can't picture Hanks as Langdon though. :/
 
ok, I'll be the first to say it - Tom Hanks bores me to tears. I wish they had hired a more interesting actor :innocent:
 
Originally posted by PrinceOfCats@Nov 28 2004, 01:15 PM
Awful book, awful actor...awful film, no doubt.
[snapback]442218[/snapback]​
:lol: I love your comments Prince :flower:
 
Oh, Dennis Quaid has the aged look I also imagined while I read the book, he may just be a tad too, well, hot for the part. I watched Terminal last night and I just can't see him being Langdon.
 
I have a feeling this will be one of those movies that's so true to the book it's not really cinema anymore. :rolleyes: Why, you may ask. This is because you have a director like Ron Howard. I also don't really like movies based on books, however there are exceptions like The Godfather and Jaws.

Plus, Tom Hanks is not hot enough to play Robert Langdon, my only qualm.
 
I see Langdon as being very handsome, very striking. Tom Hanks is neither. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE him as an actor; I'm just not sure I see him as this character. I think someone along the lines of Colin Firth (minus the accent, of course) would be better. Or how about Gabrile Byrne? Now HE smolders. :brows:

As for the female lead, I think Sophie Marceau or Rachel Weisz would be good choices. Maybe the former moreso than the latter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,979
Messages
15,244,769
Members
87,954
Latest member
banchtants
Back
Top