UK Vogue August 2025 : Doechii by Elizaveta Porodina

[ReneSanchez]

 

[vogue22]

Now THIS is a gorgeous cover!

 

[DK92]

She looks beautiful, but I wish her hair had the same texture as the rest of her body, it seems like it's not in focus... I prefer not to comment on the dress, obviously Givenchy has signed a lot of checks recently.

 

[BalkaniStaCouture]

UK Vogue August 2025 Cover​

Photographer: Elizaveta Porodina
Styling: Stella Greenspan
Hair: Jawara
Makeup: Jamal Scott
Celebrity: Doechii
(vogue.co.uk)

 

[vogue22]

GORGEOUS! FABULOUS editorial!

 

[caioherrero]

Omg, this is so beautiful

 

[jeje10]

STUNNING!
Even though I'm not a fan of Elizaveta's work, this is really good.

 

[ivano]

She has a model's beauty, so it was expected a Vogue cover story like that. Beautiful, I like the editorial the most. British Vogue is textless right now, I'm surprised. I bet print version has text as Bella's issue.

 

[tigerrouge]

It's colourful, which I like, and it's someone different for the cover. But I'm wondering if this looks far better in digital than it will in print.

I don't mind Elizaveta Porodina, but the work always seems to follow the same formula. When the strongest part of a picture comes from effects added in post-production, that can feel superficial, synthetic and unsatisfying when seen on the page, and not on a screen.

Underneath it all, is this another UK Vogue low-budget studio shoot with a musician, except this time the photographer is someone who can add enough pizazz in post-production to make you think it's more exciting than it is?

I know, who gives a sh*t about print these days, I do, which is why I'm saying this, but the world has moved on without me.

 

[MModa]

It's colourful, which I like, and it's someone different for the cover. But I'm wondering if this looks far better in digital than it will in print.

I don't mind Elizaveta Porodina, but the work always seems to follow the same formula. When the strongest part of a picture comes from effects added in post-production, that can feel superficial, synthetic and unsatisfying when seen on the page, and not on a screen.

Underneath it all, is this another UK Vogue low-budget studio shoot with a musician, except this time the photographer is someone who can add enough pizazz in post-production to make you think it's more exciting than it is?

I know, who gives a sh*t about print these days, I do, which is why I'm saying this, but the world has moved on without me.

You are not the only one who cares for print, I do as well, and I always want to see something special.

 

[Faith Akiyama]

The story is SO good, damn!

 

[vogue22]

She could've been a great print model, she has that strong late 70s bombshell presence about her here!

 

[youarearockstar]

Ughhhh new fave celebrity as a model. Damn, that's good.

 

[lhhbl]

I don't like the cover - cheap looking outfit in a weird arm position, but I do l love the colors in it and the hair!
The editorial is stunning, though. Many great fashion photos there.

 

[Armani]

A bit too much of an overload of musicians getting BV covers under Chioma thus far, but my god is this a beautiful one. Bravo.

 

[mepps]

I actually love this. Great color, and she photographs beautifully, even with the massive post production, that went into these images....are they even pictures tho? The editorial is gorgeous.

Will she even sell a cover like this, in the UK?

 

[caioherrero]

A bit too much of an overload of musicians getting BV covers under Chioma thus far, but my god is this a beautiful one. Bravo.

Rolling Stones UK

 

[honeycombchild]

British Vogue in decent cover SHOCKER.

 

[VanillaCrush]

Gorgeous, this is really striking. I love it.

 

[RMDV]

Inside shots are fun!