UK Vogue May 2023 by Adama Jalloh | Page 4 | the Fashion Spot

UK Vogue May 2023 by Adama Jalloh

Vogue is always late with everything...
1285109.jpg


Full session is in the link:
Read from Alexander McQueen’s guest-edited Dazed issue
 
Very happy to see disabled individuals in the spotlight on various covers. Absolutely hate how this was executed and have to agree that it feels more like tokenism than a true celebration of diversity, inclusion, or even the beauty of people with a wide range of disabilities. This could’ve been great, instead it leaves me feeling like they made an empty gesture just so they can say they tried at the end of the day.
 
Im perplexed. I wouldve thought you would ALL be like ‘ Yaaas Queen ‘ over this.
 
Here's just a bit about the issue from Sinéad Burke's Tilting the Lens consulting firm. They're releasing a braille edition of the issue (and all forthcoming issues of Vogue UK for the rest of the year).

Reframing Fashion: British Vogue Celebrates Disabled Talent in Historic New Edition

Reframing Fashion: British Vogue Celebrates Disabled Talent in Historic New Edition

Written by Celestine Fraser, published on 20 April 2023

Fashion has historically tended to overlook certain groups or communities, and certainly Disabled people are no strangers to exclusion within the industry. However, in recent years, there has been a growing conversation about Disability inclusion in fashion. Adaptive clothing brands are finally gaining mainstream recognition, and each year we are seeing more Disabled models walking the runways. In 2019, it felt like a breakthrough when Tilting the Lens Founder and CEO Sinéad Burke became the first visibly Disabled person to star on the front cover of British Vogue. Yet, Sinéad knew that her work was far from over: was this a moment, or the beginning of a movement? More importantly, who would be the next Disabled person on the cover of Vogue?

“I often ask myself if the fashion industry has become more accessible over the past few years, or if it has just become more accessible for me,” says Sinéad. “To create meaningful change, we must not design exceptions but pathways and pipelines.” Adaptive design and inclusive casting are important – but systemic change should lead to a fashion industry which is not only inclusive of Disabled people, but “more accessible for everyone at any point in their lives.”

Fast forward a few years, and Sinéad and her team at Tilting the Lens are sitting in Edward Enninful’s office at Vogue House. Sinéad recalls: “It was one of the most surreal moments of my entire life.” British Vogue wanted to discuss their ambition to “reframe fashion from a disability perspective,” and Tilting the Lens were exploring how they might be able to support the magazine throughout this process, as “ongoing facilitators of learning and education.” Above all, British Vogue wanted to “unpick, unlearn and really learn alongside Disabled people what a more accessible issue would look like, both in terms of the physical issue itself and the ways in which you could create safe spaces for Disabled people to engage in the process.”

British Vogue Launches ‘Reframing Fashion’ Edition
On 20 April 2023, with close collaboration from Tilting the Lens, British Vogue launched ‘Reframing Fashion’: a portfolio edition highlighting Disability justice, accessibility, equity, intersectionality and pride, with Sinéad Burke as Consultant Editor. In a historic first for the magazine – and in a rare event for magazine publishing – the May 2023 edition is available in a Braille and audio version, making the magazine more accessible to many.

The edition features five different covers, each starring an influential Disabled changemaker: Selma Blair, Ellie Goldstein, Justina Miles, Aaron Rose Philip and Sinéad herself. “It’s a dream come true,” says Aaron Rose Philip, an Antiguan-American model who in 2018 became the first Black, Transgender and Disabled person to be signed by a major modeling agency. To Aaron Rose, British Vogue’s new edition carries enormous cultural weight: “It’s imperative for the fashion industry to understand that Disabled people matter and contribute to fashion.” Ellie Goldstein, a British model with Down syndrome, agrees that “The experience was surreal and unbelievable.” Ellie, who has worked with a number of megabrands including Gucci, Nike and Adidas, is emphatic: “The world needs to see more models with Down syndrome. We need to be seen and represented. We are the same as everyone else.”

The edition not only features photoshoots and interviews with its five cover stars, but a number of other Disabled talent and advocates, including comedian Rosie Jones, racing driver Nicolas Hamilton and barrister Jessikah Inaba, who recently made history as Britain’s first Blind Black woman to be called to the Bar. With such a breadth of Disabled talent, we can’t help but wonder: is there a link between disability and creativity?

The Process
Tilting the Lens supported the British Vogue editors, marketers, operations, digital and wider teams by providing insights and actionable advice, ensuring that the lived experience of Disabled people and better practices in accessibility were at the heart of this edition.

As such, Tilting the Lens curated the talent and writers for the issue, created a checklist to scout the most accessible studios to produce the shoots, ensured the experience on set was equitable for everyone involved, held a digital accessibility workshop for the wider team, and advised on overall strategy and rollout for the edition. For the first time, British Vogue will also be made available in physical and digital Braille on May 5th, and as an audio format. This commitment will be extended to all future issues of the publication for the next year, in partnership with the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB).

Disabled People are Innovators by Default
Christine Sun Kim, an American sound artist, has a theory: “When you grow up in a society that’s designed for people who aren’t like you, you’re forced to find alternative routes and solutions to every single thing. You basically become innovative by default and I strongly believe that it keeps your mind open to new ideas.” Fats Timbo, an author, comedian and content creator, echoes Christine: “The world isn’t mostly built for Disabled people. So Disabled people have to think of creative ways to accommodate themselves.” Looking at the innovative work of creative entrepreneur Reuben Selby, or dancer Musa Motha, or indeed Trifle Studio, a London-based collective of artists and designers with learning disabilities, one could easily be persuaded that much of the most exciting art, media and culture of the moment is being defined by Disabled people.

Choosing who to feature in the portfolio was no easy feat. Sinéad sighs: “There are so many more people who could have – should have – been part of this issue. What it illuminated was the fact that this is going to be a continuous commitment from Vogue going forward, and British Vogue in particular.” In selecting the Disabled talent who would feature in the issue, intersectionality was a priority: the contributors needed to represent a diverse cross-section of the Disability community.

The Disability Community is Intersectional
“Disability is not a monolith,” says Sinéad. “So often when disability is considered, it is largely considered from a physical disability perspective, or it’s largely considered from the perspective of a wheelchair-user.” However, British Vogue and Tilting the Lens were determined to “challenge the audience in its definition of disability, both in terms of identity, in terms of expertise and discipline, but also in terms of disability type.” For example, the team brought together four different people with cerebral palsy – Rosie Jones, Dr. Rosaleen McDonagh, Nicolas Hamilton and Aaron Rose Philip – to illustrate to an audience how, “based on their identities, their experiences, the time in which they were born, the backgrounds that they came from, that they themselves are multifaceted.” Rosie, Rosaleen, Nicolas and Aaron Rose have wildly different perspectives – and the message is clear: no two Disabled people are the same. Fats agrees: “The fashion industry needs to understand that every disability is different.”
 
A braille fashion magazine?

sounds like an Absolutely Fabulous joke



this whole thing exists so that Gen Z - who live w their parents and have a lot of disposable income - will feel ok when they go and buy a 3k Dior bag. Its not about anything else. The advertisers pushing for this dont think a handicap person is going to come to Harrods now. They think Gen Z will ‘feel’ better about going to Harrods.
 
Last edited:
I officially "belong" to the disabled people category but I don't want to be noticed for that, I'd like other people to consider my work and skills instead. One of today's scariest plague is how we're relentlessly labeled this or that and another one is how some people want us to belong to communities. We're human beings first, with our fortes and flaws, I sometimes feel alone to think this is what matters first...

I'm all for diversity in fashion, but against all kinds of labels that are just put on people's foreheads by other people who just want to sell more of their mediocre products by sounding inclusive, open-minded, avant-garde or whatever they call themselves or want others to call them. We're lucky today because we see different sizes, colors etc in modeling for example but at the end of the day, what I want to see and what I'll remember are talent and "unique beauty". I think norms are one of the ugliest thing on earth and I'll always keep a soft spot for outsiders of all kinds, but there is a difference between unfair norms and high standards.
 
Dynamic, Daring & Disabled? I know and love a number of people with disabilities and they do not want to be reduced by just that. And this is very that. Imagine scoring a Vogue cover and they're calling you Dynamic, Daring & Disabled. Not a single word about your accomplishment? Terrible.

Who on earth thought of this? WHY did Edward clear this tagline? This magazine is so disingenuous, that they're willing to pull out this kind of absurd and weird tagline for social media brownie points.

Also, do they honestly think that people with disabilities will see this and think "ah inspiring, one day I'll be on the cover of Vogue" or "ah, one day I'll be able to wear that dress"? Do they know how a majority of people with disabilities worry as they are on ends meet figuring out how they'll be able to afford medication? How tone deaf this issue is.

I get that representation matters, but this should be genuine. Representation is one thing, pandering is another.
 
Last edited:
Edward, you don't need to put certain labels on certain groups of people if you acknowledge their indentiy. Because they are simply ordinary and normal.

Lots of gay and lgbt people like telling how proud they are being gay or lgbt on media, in public. I am fine with that. But please, at least consider the dilemma of these people on the covers a little bit. You are not helping, but re-amplified their disability again with sugar clothes. If they are NORMAL by your opinion, then stop doing this kind of stuff aggain.

It is HILARIOUS. Don't put your gay/lgbt advocacy methodology here, thank you.
 
Edward, you don't need to put certain labels on certain groups of people if you acknowledge their indentiy. Because they are simply ordinary and normal.

Lots of gay and lgbt people like telling how proud they are being gay or lgbt on media, in public. I am fine with that. But please, at least consider the dilemma of these people on the covers a little bit. You are not helping, but re-amplified their disability again with sugar clothes. If they are NORMAL by your opinion, then stop doing this kind of stuff aggain.

It is HILARIOUS. Don't put your gay/lgbt advocacy methodology here, thank you.
being gay is normal. Youre 100% right.
 
It's just the lack of fashion and any genuine impact that really gets me with these.

It is great to see them on the cover and for representation of the community, they just deserved far better. They're reduced to such basic identifiers that this ends up being pretty patronising and objectifies their own differences despite them still being people with feelings, nuances and successes beyond their existence as who they are. Makes it feel like they're on the cover because they are disabled, not because they're a person who deserves a cover, or is at least an interesting cover subject, and they happen to be disabled.

Very antiseptic in feeling. But at the same time, that is also a core audience of Vogue now... They want one finger in reality to feel like they're part of the change and progress, but really they don't care. Reduce it all to simple aesthetics and identifiers because it's easier to sell something that is inhumane than with actual presence.
 
They're reduced to such basic identifiers that this ends up being pretty patronising and objectifies their own differences despite them still being people with feelings, nuances and successes beyond their existence as who they are. Makes it feel like they're on the cover because they are disabled, not because they're a person who deserves a cover, or is at least an interesting cover subject, and they happen to be disabled.

Well said!
 
If Vogue was truly inclusive, they would make it a point to include all kinds of people Every. Single. Month. Instead of doing a featured issue that points out IN NEON LIGHTS how they deserve a gold sticker for being inclusive. It's not that it's *never* good enough, it's that this truly ISN'T good enough. Seeing Vogue spin their wheels and pretend to be inclusive is like a kid who's saying "Sowwy for being racist, sexist, prejudiced, classist, etc. I've changed now, pwomise!!! :pleading:" Without actually putting any thought into what true diversity means.
Enlighten us please. It seems you know what true diversity and genuine diversity is. I'm curious. Maybe you should apply at Vogue to be their diversity and inclusion director ... I miss skinny models on Vogue covers
 
Another month, another inclusivity fest. What a time to be alive.

Why are people so obsessed with seeing themselves 'represented' in fashion magazines? Fashion magazines, of all places? Like genuinely, what is there to come out of said representation? Sizes in most department stores that people can afford still aren't inclusive, stigma around disabled people didn't magically disappear because they've been put and labeled as dynamic and daring on the cover of Vogue. Not one of Edward's many outrageously tragic covers has had any impact on society whatsoever. Disabled people are not and will not ever be a part of fashion, so all this 'reframing' of fashion is nothing but a big fat pretension for this month, until Mr. Black Gay Immigrant (since Edward loves his labels) comes up with another marginalised group of people to milk for online attention of people who do not read his magazine. I understand that something in fashion has shifted in the past couple of years and that the values we hold on to are no longer valid or even existent, but Vogue at its core is not an inclusive publication. Never was. You don't have to do glamour, but don't sell me this false narrative that you are breaking boundaries and reframing fashion when you most certainly are not. We probably won't see another disabled person in fashion anytime soon, unless it's Aaron Phillips in a random appearance. Becasue the industry does not care, it is not catering to disabled people and it is not adapting to them. And I highly doubt that a regular rich client wants to be advertised clothes on people with a variety of disabilities. Please. That's why all the catalogues are still very tall and skinny. But at least we are inclusive and shiny on the online surface - where it matters!

Now about the actual images. This is very much looking like your local edition of Grazia. With the pedestrian subjects you'd expect photography to be elevated to even the scales. But no, that's not en vogue apparently. So we're left with this uninspired and utterly boring set of bad images. Now imagine if they were actually daring, as they put it. Get Steven Klein and invest in an elaborate fashion story where these women are actually portrayed in a bold, dynamic and daring narrative. Hell, get Nick Knight to shoot the portraits! Let him go all artsy fartsy like he does. But of course, I forget that when you deal in diversity you can only approach it in a serious and stoic manner because otherwise it's an offensive joke. Fab!

In conclusion, I utterly hate it. I wouldn't want this on my coffee table, I wouldn't want this in my collection.
Get your sh*t together! Either truly reframe fashion as a whole or shut the f*ck up and do your job. If next month's cover really is the queer TikTok person, I need a trigger warning because these gimmicks are becoming a little much.
 
Enlighten us please. It seems you know what true diversity and genuine diversity is. I'm curious. Maybe you should apply at Vogue to be their diversity and inclusion director ... I miss skinny models on Vogue covers
I genuinely would like to know why the obsession with inclusivity of all in fashion magazines, who it’s about selling a fantasy and luxury, its not reader’s digest or something
 
Oh damn it, I forgot to touch upon the braille edition. L O L
A magazine based on its visual content is releasing a braille edition? Does that not sound like the worst joke you've ever heard? Or do they honestly believe that their written content is so good the the blind people simply must read that? I assume that it's going to be more expensive than the newsstand version because of the production cost. Is any blind person going to buy this? Does anyone even want that? Why would they? I would genuinely like to hear about this from a blind person's perspective because I'm perplexed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,711
Messages
15,272,955
Members
88,826
Latest member
rueuphria
Back
Top