Share your thoughts on the... 2025 Met Gala!
MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.
She has no business being on the cover of GQ.
Tbh, no woman does, especially an issue celebrating the men of the year.
GQ is so far from it's peak, that it's not even funny.
She has no business being on the cover of GQ.
Tbh, no woman does, especially an issue celebrating the men of the year.
GQ is so far from it's peak, that it's not even funny.
GQ has always put women on their Man of The Year covers, from Jlo, Jennifer Aniston, Rihanna, etc. This is nothing new.Sexy and sultry. But echoes from the Vogue thread. I don't want no WAP on the cover of my GQ.
I'm just trolling people who are so uptight about a men appeared on the cover of Vogue. Because it's normal for a man magazine to feature woman on the cover but it's not okay vice versa.GQ has always put women on their Man of The Year covers, from Jlo, Jennifer Aniston, Rihanna, etc. This is nothing new.
photographed by a Black woman Adrienne Raquel. Love when they get it right, which is quite rare.I like the cover. Strangely enough it's more festive, glamorous and classy than British and American Vogue. There are some wit and quirk to it, like something you'd see on Rolling Stone. The first faultless cover under Will Welch.
Why can't you do both?Forget all the decades of bikini shots in men's fashion and style publications, these days sophisticated men are supposed to pretend they spend time ogling women's business acumen or something like that.
She has no business being on the cover of GQ.
Tbh, no woman does, especially an issue celebrating the men of the year.
GQ is so far from it's peak, that it's not even funny.