US Harper's Bazaar March 2009 : Sarah Jessica Parker By Peter Lindbergh

[AD011620]

i dont know why but i thought helena was elizabeth hurley

haha i should really go to bed after reading this not my day here

 

[parkereloise]

no im just delirious and was very confused i love helena though i just looked at it quickly
believe me im very relieved its not elizabeth hurley

 

[AD011620]

no im just delirious and was very confused i love helena though i just looked at it quickly
believe me im very relieved its not elizabeth hurley

 

[slow_hands]

What's next looks great from those snaps! oh and I want to see McNeil walking around with the giant rabbit that one looks entertaining

 

[sedirea]

I just received it in the mail, Heidi Mont's editorial is really nice including the b&w Marchesa one as well. Lots of beautiful ads, nothing is printing on crappy paper, a few choice ads are printed on sturdy almost cardstock-esque paper. A Gap Foldout, Louis Vuitton Fold out and a few new Chanel Ads (atleast.. they look new to me, I could be wrong).

 

[Caffeine]

are they available on newsstand yet?

 

[classicalbang]

^ Yes. I'm scanning as I type.

 

[TREVOFASHIONISTO]

^yes i can wait for Maryna's

 

[classicalbang]

Harper's Bazaar 03/09
"New Proportions"
Model: Heidi Mount
Ph: Camilla Akrans







Scanned by me

 

[jacobs]

The cover in HQ:

scanned by me

 

[jacobs]

scanned by me.

 

[jacobs]

What's Next : photographed by Glen Luchford

scanned by me

 

[lakomka]

I love Maryna's ed She looks so funny with those curls! Thank you so much, jacobs

 

[jacobs]

Catherine McNeil and Robert Buckley photographed by Peter Lindbergh.

scanned by me

 

[Flashbang]

uh..i have a love / hate relationship with rabbit..
roger rabbit

 

[tarsha]

The cover in HQ:
scanned by me

Thanks

 

[eneroenero]

thankssss

 

[Deleted member 45369]

First of all I want to say thanks to everyone for all their scans, they're greatly appreciated but I just gotta say What a stupid issue this looks like.

There is no ouce of creativity. It is one thing to slighty reference past work or iconic figures but to flat out just immitate gives off a Holloween feel. It takes absolutely ZERO creativity to just say "I know!! We should dress her up as Vreeland or Casati, how bout a Graduate editorial??" and further more this is a March issue and none of it has to do with Fashion. Where are the Trends of the Season?? None of the edits have a theme!!

And btw Glenda Just because you changed the edits name to "The New Proportions" from the usual "The New Shapes" doesn't make this sh*t any different than those that have been in every March/Sept. issue shot by the SAME PHOTOG in the SAME STYLE!

AND CAMERON RUSSELL!! Seriously?? the next big thing... from THREE YEARS AGO!! who never lived up to the hype! next to Frankie! if u want a familiar face go with Liya or Natalia or Elise or Eugenia, an oldie thats still relevant not some Hasbeen.

And the Bunny is just plain Stupid, thats a hot actor why not just use him??

Okay, I'm going to bed, I'm putting too much importance on this!!

 

[The.Rock.Inc.]

^ I kinda agree, especially 'What's Next' and 'New Proportions', the eds are very repetitive, and the casting is little disappointing...

The rabit in McNeil's ed reminds me of McQueen during his Spring 09 show

 

[liberty33r1b]

jacobs - thanks so much for your lovely scans!