US Vogue May 2007 by Steven Meisel

Notice that Chanel's ladder is shorter and she has already got as far as she could possibly go! Hidden bitchiness in this cover :woot::lol:
 
I love this cover.......especially they have stam.....
but Is that really stam??
 
I like it but I did expect Gemma somewhere..bit of a surprise she's missing..
 
wouldve liked Du to be there.im not complaining though!in love with this!And Caroline is in the middle,yay!
 
style_expert said:
I like it but I did expect Gemma somewhere..bit of a surprise she's missing..

probably because she was on the last model cover us vogue did ;)
 
:rofl: I love how everybody can still identify the models even though the pic is bad quality.

Nevertheless, it's still a boring cover. Just a bunch of models in ugly clothes with the most uninteresting backdrop.
 
And I'm pretty sure it's May..I can't imagine they'd already release the June cover now
 
doesn't it say 'MAY' below the 'E' in VOGUE?

covervogue190fq0.jpg

style
 
and i just realized that c.trentini finally made it on the cover - not really surprising, but who cares?? the cover is too beautiful to argue about it....
 
style_expert said:
I like it but I did expect Gemma somewhere..bit of a surprise she's missing..
I think so too....:o but the title is 'The World's Next Top Models'. Gemma is already Top model:lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OMG!! Chanel, your wig is perfect, i love the long tresses and blue high waisted skirt, is that Carmen, standing next to Sasha, holding herself in such a stoic pose?

Anyhoo, I dont think the cover is that great, nor does the title correlate with the position/standing of most of the models. Sasha is not the NEXT top model, she is already a top model, this cover should have featured young upcoming models, models who have been around for one or two seasons, not models with years and years of experience and blue chip campaign.
 
OMG, it's unbelievable!!! :shock: :buzz: Yay for Coco, Raquel and Sasha!! :clap: :clap: :clap:
I'm just excited now. :rofl:
 
Now this is something that makes me excited about Vogue again! The cover is different than what we have seen from Vogue lately; it has minimal text for once and it is a great studio shot. I wonder who photographed this? Could it be meisel?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In fact, the cover is a bit plain but I'll never complain 'cause they put models on it.
 
You seriously all love it?

Sure she put all the top models in one room and put them on the cover of Vogue but the styling and creativity is dead. It's so boring and unorignal.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,860
Messages
15,240,664
Members
87,802
Latest member
carmieeeeeeee
Back
Top