
LibertyRose said:As far as model covers go, I like the idea of using new or new-ish models who are on first-name basis among people in the industry and modelizers but still relatively new to the general public. This is the kind of cover that can take a girl's career to exciting new heights. I am definitely more interested in seeing this than a cover with Natalia Vodianova or Shalom Harlow. I'm also glad that it's a group shot. Does it say something about the lack of wow-factor of the current crop of girls when it's hard to find a girl that can single-handedly carry a cover?
julesrules815 said:So are you saying that Natalia, Daria and Gisele can't carry a cover either? Becuase they shared the Sep 2004 cover
edit: I wish they had done this cover like the Sep 2004 cover. It was so much better!
because at least the ladders and the positioning of the girls are a throwback to the vintage supermodel covers of Vogue.
I feel bad for her too. she's finally back in Vogue US this year so I thought Anna or Meisel would pick her to be one of them. ahh the result is disappointing.LibertyRose said:-- You know who I really feel bad for? Elise Crombez. Meisel works in mysterious ways. I wonder if Elise is given the cold shoulder b/c her shape has become more womanly, but that apparently did not hurt Karen Elson one bit in Meisel's world.
still I'm glad to see models on the cover. let models do their jobs.Also, how much say did Meisel have? I mean, Meisel doesn't really work with either Anja or Freja (I may be mistaken). Actually, Hye also. And Stam was included in there, and she really isnt a US Vogue regular and she's a favorite of Meisel. I don't mind Chanel is on there. Always good to see minority faces.kimair said:i'm not surprised anja and hye are missing, even though they each have done major campaigns, neither has ever been an anna favorite (anja frequently appears in bazaar, so that could have counted against her as well)...
I also guess ALT doesn't have much say either (he did say Hye was his favorite model in an article a while back, but probably wishful thinking on my part).As far as model covers go, I like the idea of using new or new-ish models who are on first-name basis among people in the industry and modelizers but still relatively new to the general public. This is the kind of cover that can take a girl's career to exciting new heights. I am definitely more interested in seeing this than a cover with Natalia Vodianova or Shalom Harlow. I'm also glad that it's a group shot. Does it say something about the lack of wow-factor of the current crop of girls when it's hard to find a girl that can single-handedly carry a cover?
It's like back in the 1970's and 1980's when people used fairly new models on important covers, and it catapulted their careers.always the bridesmaid, never the bride. She is everywhere except for US Vogue.

dbear1000 said:When this issue comes out we should all write in and say how much we liked having models on the cover. I am so excited!

Cut Copy said:yeah i spose having models back on the cover is better than having friggin "celeb"s like Angelina or Mary-Kate on it.
