Vanity Fair June 2009 : Jessica Simpson by Mario Testino | Page 5 | the Fashion Spot
  • MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.

Vanity Fair June 2009 : Jessica Simpson by Mario Testino

I like the photoshoot, but I definitely vote for 'Britney would have been better'.

The article - now up on the website - is just a recap of Jessica's career, with inoffensive quotes from the girl herself, alongside asides from the interviewer that say nothing new at all. I wish the author had found a way of framing things to make me see Jessica in a different light, to consider something about her that I wouldn't have realised. But it's like the interviewer didn't want to go anywhere with it.

I didn’t want to ask about her weight directly, so I hinted at it, asking instead about body image in general, physical changes, perception...

But then it ends up as the theme of the coverline... it might have been better to ask her, if you're going to make it the selling point of the issue. Instead, you end up with one paragraph of therapy-talk from Jessica about it, before the feature moves on.

The interview is far too long to post here, it's four pages, and you might lose interest after the first line, which talks about fractures in time:

http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/06/jessica-simpson200906

You can do a profile that flatters the celebrity that still says something interesting. Jessica may be off-the-boil, in terms of her celebrity, but... they didn't savagely ridicule her, I suppose that's something. But Vanity Fair offers writers the licence to show developed opinions and thoughts in their articles, why not have a go at doing that?
 
Lmao at the cover!
I was surfing HuffPo the other day and they had that huge banner in their entertainment section with the VF cover with a huge WHAT!?! above it.
Pretty much sums up everything.

Anyway, to any generous soul courageous enough to be seen buying a magazine with Jessica Simpson on the cover: there is a lengthy feature about the international Jeunesse Dorée
shot by Bruce Weber in the issue.
The pictures are quite gorgeous and I would be grateful if the feature (including the article) would finds its way onto this thread.
 
Fortune's Children

You can see the slideshow of all the heirs they've featured, as photogrpahed by Bruce Weber, if anyone is actually interested.
I've just put a few of the nicer shots here.

Margherita Maccapani Missoni.jpg
Margherita Maccapani Missoni

The Honorable Sophia Fermor-Hesketh.jpg
The Honorable Sophia Fermor-Hesketh

Bianca Brandolini d’Adda.jpg
Bianca Brandolini d’Adda

Amanda Hearst.jpg
Amanda Hearst

Andrea Casiraghi.jpg
Andrea Casiraghi

Dasha Zhukova.jpg
Dasha Zhukova

Olympia and Fiona Scarry.jpg
Olympia and Fiona Scarry

Tatiana Santo Domingo.jpg
Tatiana Santo Domingo

Lady Eloise Anson.jpg
Lady Eloise Anson

Armie Hammer.jpg
Armie Hammer

next-gen-0906-po02.jpg

Tatiana Santo Domingo, Bianca Brandolini d’Adda, Margherita Maccapani Missoni, and Alexia Niedzielski

next-gen-0906-po26.jpg

Tatiana Santo Domingo, Margherita Maccapani Missoni, Joséphine de La Baume, Olympia Scarry, Bianca Brandolini d’Adda (reclining), and Alexia Niedzielski

Also, here is the piece:

What’s it like being young and beautiful, with a 24-karat pedigree and inherited wealth, in populist, economically perilous 2009? The 38 heirs and heiresses who posed for Bruce Weber are making privilege count—many, like Ivanka Trump and Antoine Arnault, in the family business; some, like Mercedes-Benz scion Alex Flick, in areas of their own choosing. Checking out the C.V.’s of Kick Kennedy, Georgina Bloomberg, and Lapo Elkann, among others, V.F. surveys the next generation of some of the world’s greatest fortunes.

by Bob Colacello

Oh, to be young, rich, beautiful—and doing something. At a moment when the economy is teetering and populism is all the rage, today’s gilded youth have got their work cut out for them, and they know it. Whether it’s expanding the family business or striking out independently, launching a career in the arts or plunging into philanthropy, the 38 heirs and heiresses to fabled names and consequential fortunes in this portfolio seem determined to make a contribution to society at large while carving out identities of their own.

“With the opportunity I have been given by birth, I would be ashamed if I didn’t do something for others as well as myself,” says Agnelli scion Lapo Elkann, who calls himself a creative entrepreneur and is involved in everything from introducing an Italian vodka to supporting a hospital in Tel Aviv that cares for both Israelis and Palestinians. “We all have to prove ourselves, no matter who we are,” says Lapo’s cousin by marriage Rebecca de Ravenel, a fashion consultant. “I was very spoiled, but I knew that I wanted to work. I was working in a vintage shop when I was 17, and every Saturday morning I’d clean the windows.”
Some are very happy to follow in their ancestors’ footsteps. “We are Mondavis,” says Dante Mondavi, grandson of the famed Napa Valley vintner Robert Mondavi. “It’s our blood. We grew up on a vineyard just like my father grew up on a vineyard. I’ve never seen it as a burden.” Ivanka Trump concurs. “I have no interest in going out on my own. My dream is to continue to build on the foundation my father and his father built through the Trump Organization, and hopefully have my kids do the same.” Yet she spent a year working at another real-estate firm in order to prove herself to herself, without “the eyes of the world bearing down on me.” Antoine Arnault says he too knew from an early age that he would join LVMH, the luxury group controlled by his father. “I had a couple of years of rebellion—I was singing in a rock band. I think you have to at least try to do something else.”
Alex Flick, of the Mercedes-Benz dynasty, on the other hand, defied his father by dropping out of college and making The Magnolia Curtain, a documentary about one of the poorest towns in South Carolina. “For me, where I come from plays a big part in what I do,” he says. “I expect myself to achieve extraordinarily highly because I have been given this chance in life. It would be stupid of me to say, ‘I’ve got everything. I can sit back and relax.’ I would end up in a gutter, unhappy and incredibly unfulfilled.” Alex is taking the photographs for a book about art collectors that his cousin Princess Elisabeth von Thurn und Taxis is writing. Like him, she is committed to making a name for herself in the creative world. “I think it’s a huge privilege to be able to use the access that we have in an interesting way,” she says.
Other silver-spoon children eager to succeed in the world of the arts include: Bianca Brandolini d’Adda, who is studying acting with an eye, she says, “to go to Hollywood and win an Oscar”; siblings Joséphine and Alexandre de La Baume—she does theater in Paris, he makes films in China, together they have a band called SingTank; and Dasha Zhukova, who founded the Garage Center for Contemporary Culture, in Moscow, and is editor in chief of Pop magazine. Why would the daughter of an oligarch who is dating an even bigger oligarch give up a life of leisure to work so hard? “I still have a life of leisure,” she says. “I don’t see it as sacrificing.”
United Arab Emirates oil-and-gas heir Badr Jafar uses his family’s business as a base for forays into the creative sphere. “A day can be filled with oil and gas in the morning, ports and aviation in the afternoon, and then fashion and conference calls to L.A. about the entertainment business. It’s all about bridging cultural gaps between the Middle East and the West.”
Then there are those who are making charity their priority. Andrea Casiraghi, the elder son of Monaco’s Princess Caroline, devotes himself to a foundation for cerebral palsy. Fashion heiress Margherita Maccapani Missoni designs products to raise money for OrphanAid Africa. Kick Kennedy, R.F.K. Jr.’s daughter, serves on the junior council of Riverkeeper, the environmental organization championed by her father. Her friend Amanda Hearst, William Randolph Hearst’s great-granddaughter, co-chairs the council.

Alejandro Santo Domingo, one of the star businessmen in this group, spends a quarter of his time “on the social-responsibility side,” including overseeing his family’s foundation in Colombia and serving as treasurer of Aid for aids in New York. When he was 23, his billionaire father, Julio Mario Santo Domingo, got him involved in running their Bogotá-based Bavaria brewery business; in five years, he raised its pre-tax earnings from $185 million to $840 million, then merged it with SABMiller to create the world’s second-largest beer company. “For the first year and a half, my father was very much on top of me,” he says, “and then he kind of just let me do everything on my own.”
“I always thought, Will I go into the business or will I not go into the business?” says Jared Kushner, son of New Jersey real-estate magnate Charles Kushner, who spent nearly a year in prison on charges including tax evasion. “But when my father got arrested, I really didn’t have a choice. I was the oldest son, and it was something that had to be done.” Although he was in the process of getting graduate degrees in business and law, he found time to buy The New York Observer on the side, and as publisher has seen monthly traffic on the paper’s Web site increase from 400,000 to 1.4 million.
The most important thing about being wellborn, notes Lady Eloise Anson, who is related to the Queen of England, “is not to have a sense of grandeur. It’s just a name and a situation, and not to be flaunted. You can lose friends that way.” Sometimes, according to actor Armie Hammer, the great-grandson of oil tycoon Armand Hammer and a new regular on Gossip Girl, the name can be a pain. “It was definitely a handful growing up. Kids are so cruel. My nickname was Baking Soda. I was like, ‘You guys don’t get it. I don’t have anything to do with Arm & Hammer baking soda.’”
If there are relative difficulties with being raised rich and famous, the champion equestrian Georgina Bloomberg, daughter of New York City’s billionaire mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has them nicely resolved. “I’m really proud of who my father is,” she declares. “And I’m really proud of who I am.”
vanityfair.com
 
Beautiful rich people with problems. Amazing story. Stunning really and focusing on a subject matter that has never ever been explored before. I've never seen any of these beautiful, wealthy young people before since they never appear in the society pages. They are complete mysteries to me. My life needed this. Thank you Vanity Fair. Kudos.

Ok enough with the sarcasm, its pleasant to see new work from Bruce Weber and Antoine Arnault & Arnie Hammer need to get my phone number. Now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Beautiful rich people with problems.
I think the angle of the story was 'Beautiful rich people with projects'.
But it was kind of funny to read an article stating how populism is rife and then read your own post...

The article was rubbish but I am ready to bet that a fair amount of the people mentioned in it, who seem educated and active, have a lot more to say than 80% of the Hollywood people regularly featured in the magazine. Even though they're wealthy, yes. :flower:

Thank you for the article and outtakes rox_yr_sox. I really like how natural and reliable Bruce Weber's style is.
 
I think the angle of the story was 'Beautiful rich people with projects'.

I read the article and honestly the projects listed for most of those kids were seem like either vanity projects or just plain bunk. Most were "actors", some how involved in the fashion world or working for mom and dad. Some of them had very legitimate jobs, no doubt about it but I do not feel that VF really represented that group in the best light possible. Heirs involved in charity, community service and business are interesting in and of themselves why place them alongside a bunch of people who for all intents and purposes are jobless socialites? Even some of those with jobs are sort of suspect, I mean Dasha as editor for Pop...

I don't see anything inherently wrong with wealth, perhaps my earlier comment was a bit too sarcastic - I just feel as though they could have done a lot more to show those individuals who are out there making a difference / living up to the family name in a positive manner. The whole piece felt very hollow and quickly thrown together. Luckily Bruce's pictures hide that fact.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^I actually completely agree with you here.
This is why I called the article rubbish.

Just a little precision re: vanity projects.
Personally I don't have a problem with that. To me the purpose of money should be to liberate from utilitarian work, i.e. being able to do what you like as opposed to what is going to pay the bills.
Idleness is pure evil but if you have enough money to guarantee that you will be set for life, as long as you are educated and active in a rewarding way (be it charity fund-raiser, art dilettante, jewelry designer or C.E.O. of daddy's company), I don't see anything to be frowned upon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I saw this issue today, and had a flip through it. Nothing special at all.
 
Did anyone read the interview with Jessica? It was strange, as if the writer didn't really like Jessica either. He even writes that Jessica's future may be, something about a third husband and being a forgotten celebrity.
Even though they interviewed Jessica there's nearly no quotes from her, instead the writer just writes a biography of Jessica (which, being the huge celebrity she used to be, I would imagine most people already know?), although when he called Joe 'creepy' it did make me smile. Oh, and the quote on the cover "You call this fat?" doesn't seem to come from Jessica but the writer.
The cover shot and editorial would suggest it's Vanity Fair's way of giving Jessica some positive press and somewhat of a career boost, but the entire article seems to undermine that whole idea.

It's a really thin issue, but I did enjoy the Ted Kennedy article (as long as Vanity Fair continues to write articles about the Kennedy's I will continue to read them! :lol).
 
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Those "heirs/heiresses" featured aren't even THAT rich and it's laughable seeing Vanity Fair as well as other society papers throwing such a hoopala over them. Yes, they are certainly well-off, but if you want to argue money, many of their family fortunes are meager compared to those of the world's top billionaires.

None of the people (or their families) mentioned break Forbes' top 50 wealthiest people in the world; most of them don't even break the top 100.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^Even putting aside your ridiculous snobbism (many of those people are heir to billion(s) dollars fortunes and figure in the Rich lists of their respective countries), you are completely missing the point.

They obviously chose people who, in addition to being heir to a fortune, were heir to some social credential or family prestige (hence the mention of 'family brand' in the article). Like members or descendants of the aristocracy or the 'historical' or new jet-set, of which most of the 50 richest people on hearth do not belong to.
 
^I actually completely agree with you here.
This is why I called the article rubbish.

Just a little precision re: vanity projects.
Personally I don't have a problem with that. To me the purpose of money should be to liberate from utilitarian work, i.e. being able to do what you like as opposed to what is going to pay the bills.
Idleness is pure evil but if you have enough money to guarantee that you will be set for life, as long as you are educated and active in a rewarding way (be it charity fund-raiser, art dilettante, jewelry designer or C.E.O. of daddy's company), I don't see anything to be frowned upon.

I do agree with this wholeheartedly, nothing would be better than the funds to do what one truly wants. Its only the ones who are dilettantes that annoy me but you are correct in saying that the best part of money is the freedom it gives you. Who wouldn't love to have that in their life?

And thank you Harumi for all your great insights on this article. I feel as though this thread has taken an article that was rather hackneyed in and of itself and turned it into an interesting discussion on the politics of wealth.

Well, maybe not politics but you know ^_^
 
I thought it was a joke;-) Jessica Simpson... bloody hell... that's worth than nightmare...;-))
 
Thank you MissMag for taking the time.:flower:

I also love the fact that there has been no request whatsoever to have the Jessica pictures in HQ, or that the thread is dead for all intend and purpose.
Nobody cares.:lol:
 
thank you for the scans MissMag, I find them a bit more interesting than JS.
 
ok, one of the best things to come out of this issue. ;)

one Count Gian Luca Passi du Preposulo. mmm. yes please.

eta: dammit. and then his quote ruined it for me "it's not the title that's important, you have to be a count inside yourself". I'm not sure whether to take that as cheesy and borderline disney, or part of his sincerity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For me, it was similar to the stuff you see in Tatler every month, shot a little more interestingly, but pretty much the same faces.

I don't mind that, I only wish there'd been more content in the issue overall.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,064
Messages
15,247,995
Members
88,078
Latest member
loser
Back
Top