This is amusing, but in no way is it clever, shocking, or remotely creatively. These two dropped the ball a long time ago, imo. Their theatrics are even more annoying than those of Galliano. Sad part is, they aren't completely talentless; there is talent there, but neither wants to accept the fact that they simply aren't maverick subverters.
I've always thought that these two would be better off working in the vein of Sonia Rykiel... fun and exciting but completely wearable and appealing to a woman who wants to do more than stand and look pretty... or silly, if we're being honest...
It's not wereable, that's right. But it's shocking and it shows the concept of the brand. They obviously wont make any money from this collection but it will help A LOT to make money in other areas. I'm saying this 'cos some brands doesn't really need their clothes to be wereable as long as they have an strong point of view, a big amount of fans and other stuff to sell (such as accessories). Of course, only a few can do that.
I really really really enjoyed this collection. I envy them a lot!
Obviously, I don't want them to rip off her aesthetic, esquire. And frankly, what they are doing now isn't wholly original, either. I just find that all three design in the same mindset. Sonia Rykiel, however, manages to the bridge the line between fun/exciting and wearable, whereas V&R go out of their way to run these ideas into the ground in the most ridiculous manner, imo. You may be impressed by showy theatrics, but I am not. I like substance behind the work, it's lacking here but let's agree to disagree.
Another example of this aesthetic is Elsa Schiaparelli; subversive, clever, insane, beautiful, wearable, timeless... all rolled into one. V&R could only aspire to such heights. It's just not their strong pt. They are, however, very good @ making charming, feminine clothing.