Vogue Australia July 2010 : Rose Byrne by Max Doyle

[tarsha]

isubscribe.co.au

 

[mrsjamesdean]

What did they do to her hair?
I'm glad its Rose Byrne,if they had to put any actress then it would be her.

 

[MON]

I like it. Love the colors, the feel and the Lanvin dress. Not sure about her pose though and her smile. There's something with it that makes it very COSMO not Vogue. Still like it though

I`m guessing that they`re reprint Gisele Bundchen`s US Vogue April 2010 feature.

 

[vanessaxox]

Not liking the hairstyle- but i love the dress && the whole idea of the cover.

 

[jexxica]

So good to see her on the cover. I like it.

 

[TaylorBinque]

I love her. So I just like the cover. She can be more lovely and beautiful. Her hair is terrible.

 

[Cicciolina]

I like her, I like the dress, yet the cover just doesn't hit it for me. It's static and lifeless. It's frustrating because with such a beauty and personality, and a gorgeous dress I would think they could have done so much more with it. Definitely disappointing. And the typeface reminds me of Vogue UK.

 

[tanii94]

Great to see VA hasn't used a reprint cover so far this year.

I don't like this though.

 

[ForChicSake]

I Like This

 

[Faith Akiyama]

Rose is seriously one of the most gorgeous women in the world...but this cover does not do her justice at all!

 

[jeremydante]

'what you need now' -- is a better cover.

 

[Northern Star]

Not the best pic I've ever seen of Rose, but it's overall a nice composition and the colours work well. Gorgeous lady anyhow.

 

[versustito]

nice cover

 

[MulletProof]

I don't understand how come most of the guys I know think she's devastatingly gorgeous.. don't understand it, seriously. She's like that Emmy-phantom of the opera girl.
pretty dress though.

 

[ad041715]

This is so boring. Absolutely hate this cover.

 

[Bertrando3]

Great to see VA hasn't used a reprint cover so far this year.

I don't like this though.

yeahh lol it's not a reprint LOL BUT this is an ugly cover so who cares? just one feeling:

 

[adorefaith]

I don't understand how come most of the guys I know think she's devastatingly gorgeous.. don't understand it, seriously. She's like that Emmy-phantom of the opera girl.
pretty dress though.

Oh!, no no mullet....please don't compare Rose to that emmy girl... I do think, though, that Rose's beauty doesn't translate very well to pictures most of the time. i have seen her in person a few times...just at a cafe in sydney....and she really is quite beautiful - not devastatingly gorgeous.. but I'd compare her more so to someone like Julianne Moore than the phantom of the opera girl. she has far more substance behind her eyes than that other girl.. she isn't one of those young, pretty bland girls. She's a woman, really..

look how lovely she is here..
http://media.onsugar.com/files/ons1/192/1922564/41_2009/8b978ecc1e165680_Rose-Byrne.jpg

I certainly think they could have done better with the cover.. but in any case i'm glad to see Rose get the cover, and still so happy that Vogue Aus is doing something original and worth commenting on.

 

[gossiping]

gorgeous dress, lanvin? and she looks great too.

 

[Spiral1532]

Oh, she's the chick from 28 Weeks Later. I had forgotten that she's Australian. She's a beauty, but I don't like this cover at all, sorry to say.

 

[MrFalconer]

Gosh, Rose is so naturally gorgeous.
Dying for that pink Lanvin number. I love everything here but for me the cover just doesn't work, hate the text colors, so wrong. I think they should've taken more advantage of her face and done a glamour shot for the cover... I'm seeing shoulders up, big waved hair etc.