Vogue Australia June 2016 : Kim Kardashian by Lachlan Bailey

[Firefly216]

I was ready to be dissapointed, but I like it. Kim looks nice. However, I do not like the font layout.

 

[DutchHomme]

Zzz

She belongs on the covers of plastic surgery magazines/ads and on gossip magazines

 

[marsnoop2]

Absolutely stunning photo, the best she's ever looked. However, she has no business being on any magazine cover let alone Vogue Australia twice.

 

[[Piece Of Me]]

I cannot stand the Kardashians, but this cover is absolutely stunning! I don´t think I have ever seen her look this good.

Still don´t understand why anyone would book her for the cover or why she is seen as such an inspiring woman to a lot of yoing girls. And ugh, not Olivier again! Looking forward what kind of wisedom he has to share with us again. NOT.

 

[Fiercification]

Zzz

She belongs on the covers of plastic surgery magazines/ads and on gossip magazines

I'm not sure that such a thing exists..., maybe someone can enlighten me?

Weird choice for cover shot, she looks like she's got a neck injury, the way she's posing but as always there's a nice ambiance coming from Bailey's photography I suppose.

 

[Slater]

stunning!

 

[Wintergreen]

She looks good, but it's still Kim Kardashian so ew.

 

[justaguy]

Loving the art direction here. I could give two licks about her, but it's nice to see her without all the ridiculous amount of makeup she's usually photographed with.

 

[fluxxx]

As much as I despise her and her family, but I love this cover. Very fresh and serene at the same time

 

[kokobombon]

I like it, specially the styling. But for me the standout is the layout

 

[Bahiyya]

Oddly enough I'm a little over this "undone" Kim Kardashian look,make-up wise, that the fashion mags tend to go for when she's on the cover. Her own tends to be as boring if 10 layers heavier. I appreciate the effort to lighten her look but couldn't someone get a chance to play with her looks and more colour and such? This had more of an impact when Allure did it.

As for her being on the cover at all I find all the whingeing pretty funny. I'm not a fan but she's a major global personality at this point, whether one likes it or not. Vogue isn't a religious book so her morals are neither here nor there to me unless she's a criminal of some sort.

 

[tigerrouge]

'Disruption' is a word that keeps turning up on covers and in articles, but I must have missed the disruption memo. In particular, it seems to be a Conde Nast fixation, as if Anna Wintour's finger fell upon it one day, and now we'll hear no end of the word for months.

 

[anlabe32]

She looks natural (as far as that's possible) but i'm not sure that equals good. And a Kardashian should never be on the cover of Vogue.

 

[Creative]

I hate that Vogue always go for the undone look when she's on the cover. She looks cute and all (Photoshop is that you?), but gawwwd, they are everywhere and I can't handle it anymore. And I'm not even a hater of the Kardashians...

 

[Deleted member 116819]

The first time Kim looks good on a cover! I love this cover, Lachlan is a miracle worker!

And the layout is pretty much my style, simple, centered, clean, just right!

 

[kewkaw]

Hate to say that I like it.

 

[zoom]

Kudos to Bailey and the Vogue AU team! This is by far the best Kim has ever looked. Well done.

 

[Deleted member 1957]

stunning cover, she looks better natural than overly madeup. Those wpmdering what she's doing on a fashion magazine should know that this is 2016 and reality stars have more influence than many actresses and musicians

 

[IndigoHomme]

she looks bad, like a sick person out of the operating room

 

[pivoslyakova]

I can't beleive that people actually like this? When i saw the first post i expected people hating it (and with good reasons). She looks like if she was dying or something. I think it's cool that they decided to do a more natural looking cover but not with Kim Kardashian.