Vogue Paris March 2007 : Natasha Poly by Inez van Lamsweerde & Vinoodh Matadin

[Dieselmax]

Cover:



VOGUE. FR

I'm afraid this is the cover...And i really don't like it.

 

[kimair]

is that natasha poly?
her pose is strange...

 

[Miss Dalloway]

That is the cover?Are you sure?

 

[Sweet rus]

I hope Natasha is on the cover but they'd better choose another shot for it

 

[Alien Sex Friend]

it` s definately not the cover
i hate it
it looks like awful catalog picture from 80-ies

 

[oomarhatelier]

agree

 

[ShoeGal4Eva]

i hope its nota cover,too bad for march issue

 

[Saracita]

Yeah... did anything in particular make you think that's the cover shot, Diesel?

 

[Dieselmax]

Unfortunately, i think it is.
Look, i made a cap from Carine's appearance on Paris Premiere:

It's exactly the same picture...with VOGUE fronts

 

[Jacque Marcel]

I don't know? I sort of like it. She looks pretty and it makes me want to go to the beach.

 

[Dieselmax]

Maybe it's better this way:

Capped by me.

 

[Miss Dalloway]

I think its probably just one of the shots that are considered for the cover,if it actually made it on the cover?We will see!I like it!

 

[Trista]

NATASHA!!! That shot is hideous though.

 

[J'ador-DioR]

It's not that bad actually!.

 

[John Black]

As much as i like Natasha i really wish this is not going to be the cover picture - i like the colours and thats about it. Terrible shot - at least for a cover.

 

[MulletProof]

it doesnt look like a cover really..
..looks more like a spring supplement or intro for an editorial..

 

[Faith Akiyama]

Wow, more like a Saks Fifth Ave. catalogue shot...

 

[Cosette]

i agree with mullet...

but even if it is a cover, i rather like it. i think she looks beautiful.

 

[testinofan]

ugly cover, very 80s

 

[sethii]

They will test more than one picture with 'VOGUE' text, I won't believe it until its in shops