Announcing... The 2nd Annual theFashionSpot Awards. Vote NOW via the links below:
Designer of the YearThank you for participating!
VOTING WILL CLOSE 27/12/2024 EOD!
sterlinger said:I don't like gemma as a model, she portrays one look- innocent child (sp?), ugh never digged her!
took the words right out of my mouth...masquerade said:i hate how gemma's hair is covering the asian models face, its kinda like its saying that shes less important.
softgrey said:took the words right out of my mouth...
iluvjeisa said:Since Gemma is established and Du Juan is not, Du Juan is in a way less important and that is possibly why she doesn't have the more extravagant outfit of the two. I think they complement each other perfectly.
kaschemme said:a little review
QUOTE]
Thanks for the review
nouveau said:or they're just reading too much into it...right?...like i did with that chinese vogue september cover where gemma's star power overpowers the other 5 chinese models because they are, in a way less important...
if thats the case then i'm suprised to see the likes of sneja or sasha in any clothes at all...i mean why is sasha even wearing any clothes in the prada campaign?...approprite to her status at the time she should have been allocated a nylon bag to cover her bits at most.
it is gorgeous, at least the white supremist thing isn't as overt as it was here
i hate how gemma's hair is covering the asian models face, its kinda like its saying that shes less important.
tigerrouge said:Now, I don't know if it's because I've been listening to the French Vogue negativity at fashist, or if it's because someone's standing over my shoulder munching food while I look at it, but I have the magazine in my hands - and it's the worst issue I've seen for some time. A lovely cover, and some of the shots from the leading edit are nice, but I get the sensation that this magazine is having a laugh at my expense (or at least at the cover price I paid for it).
For example, the editorial with Natasha Poly has her wearing jackets on the top of her head, draped in suggestion of a nun's wimple - and while it's amusing in concept, it looks stupid in practice, like an artist that tries to pass off something slapdash as a work of genius. I think that's the whole feel of this issue - styling and concepts of no substance, dressed up as a package we're supposed to take seriously. I don't usually have this feeling about French Vogue, but Carine's gone too far in presentation with too little in content this issue, I think.
However, there are a lot of superb ads, so I'll be ditching the edits to enjoy the rest of the issue as it should be savoured.