No,no
dadaism is very elegant ,very exciting phenomen(i already comprehend it as a foundament of avangard -futirism,cubism,expressionnism,etc..
that's why I had sufficient clear notion what my abilities are and where my boudaries ends I can only estimate comparision with this artistic circle as a joke(may be not insulting,but joke)
I am happy that in this case people had put under totalisation everithing (there is so much various forms) that is opposite to macho men ,rusticalians,be taff guy ,be agressive...on the opposite side there is so many forms-polite,charming,sophisticated,whimsical,iconoclast,..i'll stop to name the forms...
so,I hope you understand my complex and confusing/ed thought!
that 's why i post this example..when we can name some appearance we use something that is wellknown in our case this is dada...
I had reveal essential interst with russian equivalent of dada OBERIU,P.O.V ,'s : Kruchinich ,daniel Harms, etc..(faust might be familiar with this authors because me and him as a slavs and cyrilics reading can read this in original as they were wrote-russian)
this disability ,defect of and for alegory,of/for alegorisation is the most important philo/artistic condition...