What to wear when you're nouveau riche

Mmmm, MOSCHINO! Particularly the Spring 2006 Collection:
http://www.style.com/fashionshows/complete/S2006RTW-MOSCHINO

00010m.jpg
00380m.jpg


Throw in some Cavalli, some D&G spiked boots, Gucci thigh-highs, Dolce & Gabbana sparkly dresses. And don't forget Frida's vision of Gucci:

00020m.jpg
00090m.jpg


Credit: style.com

Sooo much fun! Can't say it's not fun. :heart:
 
thats more fashion victim to me or even sl*tty but not new rich
 
thats more fashion victim to me or even sl*tty but not new rich
I see Frida's Gucci as very nouveau riche considering so many nouveau riche celebrities have gone for it. I don't think it'd necessarily "sl*tty."
 
i was referring to the kind of cleveage shown above.

i think most nouveau rich people dress to impress to show they have the money to wear all the big desigers, thats why they have everything monogrammed or that screams that is from x brand, show off their money. But having bad taste also applies for everyone else.

paris-hilton-camel-toe-thumb.jpg
jlo.jpg
Celebrities+Arriving+Gucci+Dinner+4TJefAJDWsKl.jpg

wizbangblog,sofistication.wordpress,zimbio


the nouveau rich look is identified as people who wear ordinary clothes but from a high end brand, they remain "simple" but snce they can afford it now, they spend their money on stupid stuff that dont need to be premium brand but they choose something flashy "in case someone notices"
 
^ I guess the Hiltons' money is oldish at this point ... that certainly is a look that Paris is sporting :wink:

This thread I suppose is simply suggestions for the nouveau riche, which they can either take up or not :wink:
 
In post 385 Its the Jacket and Boots that are Ott for me... I think the bag and scarf and leggings and cardi are nice!

It's just that point where you can overdo it... I always think you can get away with one... obvious type signature item... a birkin... a LV monogram... burberry cheque... but any more than one at once is looking tacky... wanabe... look at me!!!
 
yes, i agree...more than one obvious item is too much..pick one and keep everything suttle
 
This thread is so funny and entertaining...and true, at times. I must say I am somewhat sympathetic to and forgiving of nouveau riche style. In some ways, or some contexts I should say, I find it appealing in its ostentation and lack of pretence. It is what it is: look at how much money I have. Maybe it's because I come from a country that historically lacks a prominent upper/aristocratic class, and where the now-wealthy, powerful class comprises of mostly 'simple folk' who lucked out. So the distinctions between new/old money, high/low class are quite arbitrary, no? They are just economic terms, unlike many other places, where they are also cultural terms.

Curiously, these distinctions are used all the time, much to my chagrin. And I am no saint, I also snigger at the purported nouveau-riche. What bothers me isn't their personal style; I even covet some of those clothes and accessories. But I despise their architectural style. The restaurants, clubs, hotels, and private homes that cater to this mindset are so ugly!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Milada: that Gucci collection was actually one of the halfway acceptable ones imo. it was hooker trashy enough to be "good". unlike Frida's other collections.......
 
World's Most Expensive Suit
£70,000
by Alexander Amosu

Alexander Amosu, luxury designer to the rich and famous, will show off the suit at a party in a secret location.
Extra security for the suit has been arranged with transportation of the suit to the venue provided by an armoured Range Rover.
The suit is a one-off creation made from the finest fabrics in the world and has taken in excess of 80 hours to complete with over 5,000 individual stitches equating to £14 per stitch.

It has taken more than 80 hours and 5,000 individual stitches to make it - equivalent to £14 per stitch.
The materials used include vicuña, a rare wild South American animal related to the camel which only produces enough wool for shearing every three years.
Another is qiviuk, the world's most expensive wool, gathered from the Arctic muskox.
When blended with pashmina from the high mountain plateaus of the Himalayas they create Vanquish II, one of the world's most luxurious cloths.
The addition of nine 18-carat gold and pave set diamond buttons completes the suit.
Designer Alexander Amosu said the economic crisis had not completely stopped the demand for designer fashion.
He said: "Buying an Alexander Amosu suit is the ultimate in luxury. We create the finest bespoke suits using fabrics which emphasise character, style and individuality.
"I firmly believe that in the wake of the recession, there is still a demand for uncompromising quality.
"We might not be catering to everyone, but the people who buy Alexander Amosu want to wear the very best suits in the world."
Amosu specialises in designing luxury fashion and technology products.
The London-based businessman made his first million by composing and selling mobile phone ring tones.
In 2008 he was listed in The Times Top 40 Under 40 of rising media industry entrepreneurs.
3470464962_f1855998e2.jpg


Watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66ImJ-98W-k
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh my god, vicuña! We have them here. I didn't realize their wool is so precious. They're just like llamas, teehee. Er or the camel according to the info above.

Too be honest, I had a softspot for it when it came out and I still do. It is most def not for me, but I remember when it came out, I was in high school and had a myspace. I had a fantastic pic of Snejana in that red dress on it. Come to think of it, I never deleted my myspace, so it's still there, hahaha.

But then I saw a lot of celebrities wearing it and they severely lacked in style. Although I believe I recall Keira Knightley and Kate Hudson being halfway decent. Jessica Simpson on the other hand, hell no. It's just trying too hard to be glamorous. Honestly if I wore it, I'd tone it down.

But I associate Frida's Gucci with nouveau riche because it sells well with celebrities, most of whom are nouveau riche. When I think of the nouveau riche, I think of people who want to flaunt their wealth by wearing the big names like Gucci. Everyone's heard the name Gucci and it's always been synonymous with expensive and glamorous. The people who think money buys style and status. I mean they used Rihanna for ads.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
they remember the glamour from the Tom Ford era. of which nothing is left these days, thanks to Frida. all hail the woman who can turn gold into stone!

and that suit.... at 70 grand, it better pleasure and massage me all day long! the bling is unneccesary tho. but yeah, i believe it'll sell like hotcakes.
 
they remember the glamour from the Tom Ford era. of which nothing is left these days, thanks to Frida. all hail the woman who can turn gold into stone!

That's my interpretation as well.
 
dont bash those who are new rich people. at least, as weber says, theyre actively pursuing social mobility through their own means instead of mindlessly spending $$ inherited from their parents/ancestors. its just the style which is inherently :x
 
This thread is so funny and entertaining...and true, at times. I must say I am somewhat sympathetic to and forgiving of nouveau riche style. In some ways, or some contexts I should say, I find it appealing in its ostentation and lack of pretence. It is what it is: look at how much money I have. Maybe it's because I come from a country that historically lacks a prominent upper/aristocratic class, and where the now-wealthy, powerful class comprises of mostly 'simple folk' who lucked out. So the distinctions between new/old money, high/low class are quite arbitrary, no? They are just economic terms, unlike many other places, where they are also cultural terms.

Curiously, these distinctions are used all the time, much to my chagrin. And I am no saint, I also snigger at the purported nouveau-riche. What bothers me isn't their personal style; I even covet some of those clothes and accessories. But I despise their architectural style. The restaurants, clubs, hotels, and private homes that cater to this mindset are so ugly!

I agree, I like the honest, straightforward part of it.

And what you say about architecture is true here as well ... McMansions :yuk: It's so rare to see anything of any architectural value whatsoever in the 'gated communities' that dot the landscape like smallpox :ninja:

LOL at the gold-pinstriped suit and its security :rofl:
 
Chanel pieces are dead-on.

I seriously think 'logo-mania' will be back sooner than we hope. I really do not think it was a fad: it is creeping back, I tell you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,726
Messages
15,125,316
Members
84,428
Latest member
treasureagence
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->