Most of the US west coast hipsters I have seen wear Chuck Taylors (high or low) or the 70s retro leather/suede sneakers/trainers, not the hightops. I would say at the moment Puma is the most commonly seen of the leather ones, but Gola is making a strong bid and Adidas seems to have fallen back.Lena said:...
as for those shoes, neither fit the image of hipsters shoes here..
Yes, I agree!lady grey said:...
the hipster clothing thing is fine.
it's the attitude & 'anti-' philosophy that is extremely irksome.

lady grey said:as a clothing 'trend' the hipster look is fine, it has much in common with 'vintage' 'rock n roll' and even 'bohemian' or 'arty' dress. I myself wear certain vintage-y items from 60s-70s that are 'scenester-esque.' [1966 tweed sportcoat; 1976 emerson lake & palmer flash-rock tee shirt].
but specifically in usa and microcosmically in nyc, hipsters are identified as [usually] williamsburg and lower east-siders with a horrid 'cooler than thou' attitude based on nothing more than a pseudo-political-cultural stance. and this 'coolness' is usually based on their belief that only they know the cool bands & clothes. its really that superficial & if you engage them in conversations about history, culture, philosophy etc, you will be stunned at how their points of reference begin around 1983 wheh MTV debuted.
So its not cool to be 'a hipster' its 1 of the most hated 20-something dumb fads in nyc & I gather across america. 'hipster' carries a terrible connotation at this point and that is much-agreed upon.
the hipster clothing thing is fine.
it's the attitude & 'anti-' philosophy that is extremely irksome.
B)

your definition goes well with this:As You Like It said:If they spend a lot of money to look like street bums, if they talk too loud in coffee shops about Sartre, if they proudly and obstreperiously listen to bands you have never heard of, which all sound the same (whiny, strident, musically inept), if they have not had a working relationship with a hairbrush for a good two years, if their car is mostly held together with snarky bumperstickers, and if they can sneer in their sleep, then they're probably hipsters.
Someone who thinks that they are being "special" and "unique" for liking some underground bullsh*t no one else cares about. And they pointlessly look down on people who don't know anything about indie culture, because that's the only thing they know anything about. They're quick to call the rest of the world conformists when in reality, they are the ones conforming by partaking in a "too cool for mainstream so i am going to reject it by looking and acting like a grungy ***hole" way of life only to seem uber-fashionable. They just end up looking like idiots.

Commonly held idea across many age groups, methinks.the idea that anyone who isn't them is an idiot
to me, im sucha geek for it.
This is exactly where I was going, this is what I think of when I think hipsters. Arrogance has a lot to do with it which is why I just can't stand it.softgrey said:i will confirm this...it's the ATTITUDE that is the problem...but this is generally associated with youth and ignorance...the idea that anyone who isn't them is an idiot and has absolutely NO idea about anything remotely cool...it's a dismissive attitude...it's rampant in the fashion wannabes...including and especially young wannabe stylists (or really asst stylists)...and some young designers...(the ones i was trying to explain about in another thread)
the idea that if you don't like what they like...then you "just don't GET it"...well i GET it...i just DON"T LIKE IT...i am allowed to think for myself and because i have a different opinion from you ...doesn't make me stupid or 'uncool'...it just means i can think for myself...
and lady grey is right...ask them for a reason why...and their answer will usually be the standard 'you just don't get it'...meaning...'i have nothing to back up what i am saying so i will sneer at you in an attempt to make myself feel better"...
sound annoying???...IT IS...
hipster was once a cool thing..but these kids have bastardized it and now it's another word for annoying wannabes...
B)

softgrey said:hipster was once a cool thing..but these kids have bastardized it and now it's another word for annoying wannabes...

hi there...in my area...it's a fairly newish way of describing the whole..'i'm too cool for school group'...i'd say 2-4 years...max...and the look is really 'the strokes'...as someone mentioned very early on...tigermilk said:hi all,![]()
I am very interested in subcultures of all kind.
Especially modculture and indiepopculture is close to my heart.
I think the whole hipster thing is something kind of mainly from the us ( i'm from sweden) but allso when I've been travelling in uk, and perhaps all over europe there are quiet a lot of garagekids, which are super annoying loud teens think they are special, but all look the same with sort of unsymetrical bangs and reading NME, are they considered hipsters?
I thought hipsters was more of some kind of pre- emo after grunge thing while there was a britpop wave in europe perhaps. Perhaps listning and influenced by ermm say, velvet underground - sonic youth,
whatever,
sorry its just that i hate how the genre "indie" is totally misstreated today!!
cause indiepop really meansto me, im sucha geek for it.
![]()
xx
well...he made it mainstream anyway...


Nemova said:^^^ Hipsters, where I live, fit in all the negative definitions put in here. So I know what I'm talking about, because there are loads of them in my college and in the places I usually go. And they all sound like they know zero about everything except the latest 'it' band from God knows where. They all dress the same and like the same stuff. I still don't like them, there's no uniqueness to people who wear jeans (or a skirt if you're a girl), a tee and a pair of Adidas to look different from the rest of us while looking the same as the hipster next door.

model_mom said:OMG I think Sarah is one. I never knew what her style was,but you described it to a tee.
