TheCheekyCritic
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 651
- Reaction score
- 0
so that last time allure used a full body shot was with fergie...who isn't exactly blessed with a pretty face...
And I always thought I was the only one who always saw the ugly in Fergie's face.
I wouldn't be surprised if Beyoncé herself had a lot to do with this particular choice of cover shot. At any rate, the styling is very typical for her, and she loves to show off that leg everywhere, whether it's appropriate or not. While there's nothing wrong with showing a bit of leg per se, I must say I, for one, was annoyed to the brink of a brain freeze when she insisted on pushing out that thigh at the 2007 Academy Awards for every single God forsaken shot.
As a cover shot, it isn't that awful, but as a cover shot of Beyoncé, it's rather old. Never mind the overexposure of Beyoncé's legs, it's her expression and bad hair that kills it for me. She even looks a little cross-eyed here, though that might just be the size of the preview that's throwing me off.
In the end what it boils down to is this -- does this cover make me want to buy this issue? And no, it doesn't. Though I don't fail to appreciate Allure coming out with a different kind of cover in this way, I fear it has more to do with their choice of cover star than any real desire to come out with something new.
(That's a gorgeous[!!] earlier Allure cover from Beyoncé, though, VickiB! She looks so much more beautiful less sexed up, letting her personality shine through. I'm surprised to see there actually was a time when she could come out with something like that. Thanks for posting! )