Announcing... The 2nd Annual theFashionSpot Awards. Vote NOW via the links below:
Designer of the YearThank you for participating!
VOTING WILL CLOSE 27/12/2024 EOD!
She probably gave us her view to UK swinging 60's fashion with those murky colours^ At least this Burda cover must have looked cool in its times. On the contrary, this Chanel show will never look good because Virginie has no taste and no sense of humour. I refuse to believe a stylist is involved in this Chanel mess, it's always heavy, frumpy, and straight up ugly. And what's the thing with murky colours?
They look so much better here than on the runway.Not crazy about the styling and a few items are head-scratchers, but I love so many of these pieces. They're being called frumpy and old, but to me, they're very youthful, not in a "sexy" babydoll OR streetwear sort of way that fashion so often pushes. I especially feel that in the behind-the-scenes photos.
vogue.com
let’s get one thing straight: apart from the fact that Karl was talented he also knew perfectly what it was to be rich, luxurious, ostentatious, stylish. his designs and accessories (jewellery, shoes, handbags) reflected that.
Virginie doesn’t look like she knows anything about it.
But if it wasn't for Karl and his ostentatiousness and vision, there would probably be no Chanel for Virginie to put out her frumpy garments. Remember, Chanel was near irrelevant by the time Karl got to it.Gabrielle Chanel loathed ostentatiousness.
true but it seems that he did it by selling other stuff, maybe with make up? i don't know, clearly the tenure was successful but I don't think young girls adopted the chanel style? is no 5 financing everything? anyone knows the numbers?But if it wasn't for Karl and his ostentatiousness and vision, there would probably be no Chanel for Virginie to put out her frumpy garments. Remember, Chanel was near irrelevant by the time Karl got to it.
But if it wasn't for Karl and his ostentatiousness and vision, there would probably be no Chanel for Virginie to put out her frumpy garments. Remember, Chanel was near irrelevant by the time Karl got to it.
You clearly underestimate the degree of success of RTW during Karl’s tenure and also overestimate the success of N5. It’s been like more than a decade since their top selling fragrance is Coco Mademoiselle. They are still pushing N5 because it’s the foundation of their beauty business and it still appeal to an older crowd…Much like they sells more classic bags than 2.55true but it seems that he did it by selling other stuff, maybe with make up? i don't know, clearly the tenure was successful but I don't think young girls adopted the chanel style? is no 5 financing everything? anyone knows the numbers?
Karl used the logo in everything. my question i guess is, who bought chanel and what did they buy? because it doesn't seem the suits sold by a lot, they are rarely seen anywhere.You clearly underestimate the degree of success of RTW during Karl’s tenure and also overestimate the success of N5. It’s been like more than a decade since their top selling fragrance is Coco Mademoiselle. They are still pushing N5 because it’s the foundation of their beauty business and it still appeal to an older crowd…Much like they sells more classic bags than 2.55
Chanel under Karl sold well. It was a different clientele though. There were less logos on clothes so Virginie’s clientele is likely younger with a strong spending power.
Plus, when Karl was at the helm, while Chanel was already super expensive, it was more affordable than today. In his last seasons, a tshirt was between 700/850€ and jeans from 900€/100€ for entry prices RTW. Today, some of the tshirts from the resort collection start at 1900€.
Karl’s Chanel is very different from Virginie but Virginie’s tenure highlight IMO, more than Karl’s the power of the name and the branding of Chanel.
He mostly used logos on accessories and in prints but if you look more in depth, the clothes were so infused with Chanel codes that he barely used logos on them.Karl used the logo in everything. my question i guess is, who bought chanel and what did they buy? because it doesn't seem the suits sold by a lot, they are rarely seen anywhere.