Coco Rocha | Page 651 | the Fashion Spot

Coco Rocha

^I found the second paragraph to be particularly close-minded and all too eager to embrace over-simplified conceptions of modeling. For instance, it's quite clear that everyone nowadays isn't a model and I don't know any children who aspire to be one. Moreover, I don't think modeling is some default career that people fall upon. Many models model on the side while they pursue their main career and the majority of the public doesn't ever model to begin with. The author seems to be belittling what we know as Coco's ample success in the industry, making her rise to fame seem commonplace and amounting it to "three fat paragraphs on her Web resume". The author comes off as ignorant and vindictive, which I really don't like.


Plus she looks amazing at Zac Posen! whooo!!!:clap:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Model Coco Rocha attends the Marc Jacobs Women's Collection 2010 Show at the NY State Armory on February 15, 2010 in New York City.

wireimage
 
I hope this is the right place to put this:
atricle on Coco. All I can say is o.O

At size 4, Fashion Week model Coco Rocha, 21, is latest of many women considered fat by industry

BY Amy Diluna
DAILY NEWS FASHION EDITOR

Tuesday, February 16th 2010, 8:57 AM


So it's come to this.

After all the hype, promises and international outcry, fashion's still calling normal girls fat.

Coco Rocha is the latest victim of fashion's irresponsible, unattainable demand that young women - some barely into their teens - be emaciated.

The 21-year-old top model, an outspoken advocate for industry reform, told The New York Times that demand for her services has waned, thanks to an occasional hamburger habit.

Sunday, she modeled for Diane von Furstenberg. Monday, she walked in Zac Posen's show.

Look at the pictures.

She's a size 4 - and she's gorgeous.

Gemma Ward, an Australian who quit the business last year, got attention recently for chunked-up pictures (read: she's got thighs) that circulated online. One blogger suggested she could get work in the plus-size biz.

Compare these women with the models getting all the bookings - stick figures with jutting collarbones, thighs the size of their ankles and not a whisper of a womanly curve.

They're following in the footsteps of waifs like Kate Moss, who recently gave us her words of wisdom: "Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels."

It didn't feel good for Ana Carolina Reston, the 88-pound Brazilian who died in 2006 of complications from anorexia.

Don't feel sorry for the models: They live in a country where there's access to food, and are actively starving themselves to make money. They're making a choice.

Crystal Renn, a size-12 model who spent the early part of her career starving herself, says she was chasing a dream.

"No one chained me to a treadmill; no one forced me to starve," she told the Daily News. "I made those decisions to reach for the standards that were set for me."

Want to throw blame? Look straight at the people who are paying them.

Last week, the Council of Fashion Designers of America threw a symposium where designers, models and editors discussed raising the "sample size," the industry standard set for runway and magazine photo shoots, to a size 4.

Right now, it's a zero.

Designers and agents alike know that they're setting the bar for boniness - and that it's set pretty high.

Stunner Doutzen Kroes was at that panel and told The Associated Press she doesn't do shows because she doesn't fit into the sample size.

So she joined Victoria's Secret's brigade of sexy girls. "I eat and I am happy," she said. "I want a healthy lifestyle, and I hope other models can have choices like that."

Rocha spoke out at the event, too, saying, "It took a while to grow the confidence to say, 'This is who I am, take it or leave it.'"

And fashion, she has now revealed, decided to leave it.

Two years ago, at the first of these useless events, she admitted that when she was at her thinnest - just 108 pounds (she's 5-feet-10) - someone told her to lose weight.

So she did, and made herself ill with diuretic pills taken on an empty stomach. She vowed never to do it again - and made a plea then to the people present at the dog-and-pony show to make a change.

It was a cry for help.

And no one has listened.

from: http://www.nydailynews.com
 
I don't know what to think of this article. I think Coco was trying to stand up for herself but the author completely twisted it.

nytimes.com
I am actually peeved at this article. As I was scrolling through it, I was asking myself what third rate publication is this and how did it get an interview with Coco Rocha. Imagine my surprise when I got to the end and found out it was the New York Times.

Actually the end of the article makes sense and the author is making good points that I agree with, but I take issue with the beginning of the article and the snark directed at Coco. I say this as someone is who is a fan of Coco but not a rabid fan and would not object if a writer directed criticism or snark her way if the comments were true and substantive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am actually peeved at this article. As I was scrolling through it, I was asking myself what third rate publication is this and how did it get an interview with Coco Rocha. Imagine my surprise when I got to the end and found out it was the New York Times.

Actually the end of the article makes sense and the author is making good points that I agree with, but I take issue with the beginning of the article and the snark directed at Coco. I say this as someone is who is a fan of Coco but not a rabid fan and would not object if a writer directed criticism or snark her way if the comments were true and substantive.

Yes, that's why I posted it. I agree that the author made some good points regarding the industry but I thought the snark towards Coco was completely unnecessary. But Coco linked to the article in her blog, so I assume she wants people to read it.

Anyhow, she looked divine at Sophie Theallet! :wub:
 
^ The last year or so the NY Times is a third rate publication, and almost about to go under...:rolleyes: Anyway-I find it very hard to believe any, even borderline sane designer or agent would not cast Coco because of you know...that is absolutely ridiculous...She is a master of the runway! (Well, mistress, but that always makes me think of leather bustiers and whips...):o
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A size 0 is tiny. It's for people who are petite. And people who are 5'11 (models) aren't that size.

I think even Gisele is a size 2 at best.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,353
Messages
15,298,433
Members
89,318
Latest member
fashiongurlieval
Back
Top