Cover Rumor Thread | Page 30 | the Fashion Spot

Cover Rumor Thread

While we're waiting for the image to appear, I still laugh at that statement T-shirt that says 'Flick yer bean for Agyness Deyn'. Well, at least we know how to pronounce her surname now...
 
WoW! Stella and Agyness on the cover of UK Vogue! Now that will make my day!
 
since there is no confirmation of this, this thread is being merged with the cover rumour thread...
 
Pulp Fiction said:
yeah her cover was posted by truebluejen.
Oh,well when i posted that,there was no thread about it!:p
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tigerrouge said:
I still laugh at that statement T-shirt that says 'Flick yer bean for Agyness Deyn'. Well, at least we know how to pronounce her surname now...
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Meanwhile the prospect of a cover with Stella & Agyness sounds really promising, I can't wait, I hope Testino has shot it.
 
tigerrouge said:
While we're waiting for the image to appear, I still laugh at that statement T-shirt that says 'Flick yer bean for Agyness Deyn'. Well, at least we know how to pronounce her surname now...


what does it mean"flick yer bean for agyness deyn"? dont get the flcik yer bean:blink:
 
^Based on the other shirts, I think it's something sexual. :shock: :lol:

So, good news about British Vogue. I was scrolling the last page and all I saw was :woot: :woot: :woot: , so i knew it had to be good.
 
Flicking your bean means, ah, giving yourself a good rub. Something a woman might do while picturing a cover shot of Agyness, and then crying afterwards when they find she won't actually be on the cover.
 
tigerrouge said:
Flicking your bean means, ah, giving yourself a good rub. Something a woman might do while picturing a cover shot of Agyness, and then crying afterwards when they find she won't actually be on the cover.

:lol:
tnx for the explanation:flower:
 
Great news!! :buzz: I cannot wait to see it!

Meanwhile, any news on Italian Vogue April?
 
Just found an image of the April cover on the voguevanity.it website and have posted it as a separate thread.
 
gossip on the next POP cover, which is NOT featuring Lindsay Lo. :shock:

You may notice that the current cover of ‘Pop’ magazine features a male model, but this was not meant to be the case. After all, the magazine had spent a small fortune on acquiring Lindsay Lohan as a cover star.

What could have gone wrong? It turned out to be a re-fuelling problem for the Hollywood starlet, who turned up to the photo shoot somewhat the worse for wear.

The shy, retiring young lady insisted on being topless in almost every shot, demanding that her bangers be photographed for posterity. A couple of hours later, photographers Mert and Marcus were left with a series of shots of Lohan’s lollipops and little else. Luckily, there were two shots in which the strumpet had failed to thrust her breasts into the lens and the pics were totally without nipples.

Unfortunately, those two shots contained rather graphic illustrations of the entrance to Lindsay’s womb. She is famously being fond of waving her lady bits to the camera, much as a family butcher takes pride in his neatly organised but undeniably meaty window display.

Damage limitation time. Lohan’s publicist, Leslie Sloane, (who also represents acting scarecrow Nicole Kidman) phoned the magazine the very next morning and told the editor that if any of these pictures saw the light of day, said editor would “never work in Hollywood again.”
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,354
Messages
15,298,591
Members
89,323
Latest member
Bertrim
Back
Top