Cover Rumor Thread | Page 1747 | the Fashion Spot

Cover Rumor Thread

If you read the comments on the Instagram post, the rumours circulating the Madonna x Meisel reunion is for an upcoming album cover Madonna has in the works, and not for a magazine.
 
I didn’t hear of any rumors about them working together again, so that post was quite random though. I guess ppl said it’s for her new album artwork just because Madonna has been teasing her new music a lot on Instagram.

If their reunion is true, a British Vogue September cover is what I’m expecting as I posted few weeks ago. Madonna’s 60th birthday is coming in August, and Meisel is a lock for September issue since he has shot the covers for Dec/March/June. But of course, it could be both.
 
The Mail (i know, i know...) have reported today that Victoria will be on the September cover of UK Vogue. With the family and David inside.
it will be 10 years of her fashion label.
 
^ She defo didn’t get the cover, it’s a feature for VB, no idea if family is in the shot.

Madonna better be for a cover by Meisel. Especially since last year she turned down guest editing VP which then went to Rihanna and became the most boring guest edited Christmas issue in their history, imo.
 
The Beckhams will show a united front next month when they appear as a family for the first time in an interview and shoot for Vogue magazine.

As part of celebrations to mark the tenth anniversary of Posh’s clothing label, she, David, and their four children – Brooklyn, Romeo, Cruz and Harper – will be interviewed for the cover feature.

Sources at Conde Nast, the publishing house which owns Vogue, say they expect it to be one of their best-selling issues.

One said: ‘It is such a coup to get the whole family together for one really special interview. It will celebrate Victoria’s life as a businesswoman but also as a mother and a wife. Everyone is really excited, nobody more so than her.’
dailymail.co.uk
 
I'm always interested in Victoria and how she's made the most of herself... but spare me this package deal.
 
^ Same here, no interest in David or her kids, at all. Focus should be on her, and her brand. But no worries, Rihanna is the Sept cover.
 
Whilst Victoria has been featured before, surely for her label's anniversary she'd have negotiated a cover in there? Throwing in David and the family was probably a way of securing it. Perhaps she's October's?
 
^ Same here, no interest in David or her kids, at all. Focus should be on her, and her brand. But no worries, Rihanna is the Sept cover.

So, Rihanna for September. Victoria for October? November Alek Wek and I would put money on December being Kate Moss if she doesn’t appear on the August issue.
 
Whilst Victoria has been featured before, surely for her label's anniversary she'd have negotiated a cover in there? Throwing in David and the family was probably a way of securing it. Perhaps she's October's?
Perhaps, but timing is weird since Sept and it’s content, is being shot now. And two celebs in a row?I wont be shocked if VB is ok with just a feature since she will get plenty of other cover chances.

^ More than Kate, I really would prefer a Naomi cover, sigh.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
More than Kate, I really would prefer a Naomi cover, sigh.
The one thing I really expected to happen under Edward's reign is the triumphant return of Naomi Campbell on the cover of UK Vogue, all sins forgiven, and perhaps even shot by Meisel himself.

I don't feel I can really get behind the 'New Vogue' until something like that happens.
 
The one thing I really expected to happen under Edward's reign is the triumphant return of Naomi Campbell on the cover of UK Vogue, all sins forgiven, and perhaps even shot by Meisel himself.

I don't feel I can really get behind the 'New Vogue' until something like that happens.
That would be so cool! She was the star in the last Versace ad (along Christy and Gisele). Maybe she shares cover with Kate, same way as Gigi and Bella in march (imagine Kate by Meisel!). About the Becks, I think David deserves more that Vogue cover, rather than victoria. He's a fashion icon, it would be cool if he is on it. His L'Uomo Vogue cover was major! I don't know if he is a good seller for british GQ.
 
Can't say I'm all psyched at the idea of the Beckhams on Vogue. They've done this for US Vogue before, but didn't get the cover. I suppose given Victoria's omnipresence on British Vogue it wouldn't be that much of a stretch. And shoving the entire family on the cover would probably tear at the heartstrings of the Daily Mail-type reader while serving as a subtle one-up on Alexandra's Vogue. 'I didn't just get her, I got her and the hubby, AND the kids', just like he may have had Cara again, but shot by Meisel. Someone once mentioned Victoria hoped to be photographed by Meisel at some stage. I can see her leveraging what she's offering to make that happen, although I'm not sure Meisel will budge.

And he should just give Naomi her cover so we're over it. It's like a band-aid about to be ripped off at this stage. Better her than Rihanna. Only looking forward to Alek Wek!
 
Word on the street is that Kim K had a top secret shoot with Klein for two days last week... wonder for what publication?

Anna needs sales...if Kendall is able to move mags she might try her luck with Kim again sans Kanye.
 
Or it could be W, V, or VI. Kim never covered V, did she?
 
Lol, yes, who?

Even though Vogue goes for fresh faces every now and then, it's still a name that is sort of on everyone's lips.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top