Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) goes Nude

g.gif


:ninja:
 
mmm, oh harry!

i dont care if he's 17, radcliff is looking damn good.

and it certainly doesnt hurt that equus is a really good play (wish i was living in london... not JUST to see this, but definitelty one of many reasons)
 
Those pictures scarred me... I don't think he's attractive or that good of an actor.

Equus
is a good play, so it'll be interesting to see how he does.
 
this is really not cute... I always thought he was ok as a nerdy / uglyish child but seeing the same face attached to this pale hairy body... not my taste at all.
 
Ya know, I saw the full frontal pics...and it wasn't bad at all.

I felt like a perv look at Harry Potter's wand, but it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. I was expecting something like a big pinky (Terrance Howard). He also has a nice lil six pack (among the visible ribcage).

But the theme of the play is beastiality-right? That...I dunno about.
 
I just saw the full frontal shot.....I too felt like a perv, but outside of the messy hair and geek glasses he's actually a cutie.
 
Is it wrong that those pics make me want to shag Harry Potter? :lol:

I know, I'm a little disturbed :rolleyes:
 
I read through all the comments and somehow, I get a feeling of unfairness towards him. On the one hand, there's talk of how nudity doesn't mean maturity and yet, there are so many along the lines of "But he's Harry Potter!".

I agree that doing nude scenes for the sole sake of moving away from the HP character isn't wise but this guy is trying something new. So I'll reserve my judgment. I feel it could be an issue of challenging the self and that I appreciate, over those who stick to roles they are comfortable with, roles that have won them accolades.

Just for the record, I don't find him sexy in the pictures either.

What I'm also wondering is this - if he was never Harry Potter and he's doing this exact same thing, would there still be as much criticism against him?
 
I think he's an actor whose taking a risk in order to exapnd his acting abilities. The reviews are good and it's about damn time that he is given the opportunity to act like this because Harry Potter greatly limits him.
 
Spike413 said:
I just saw the full frontal shot.....I too felt like a perv, but outside of the messy hair and geek glasses he's actually a cutie.
The full frontal is a fake. No such pic was ever made. But for the record, I've seen the photoshop montage you're talking about too and let say Daniel has nothing to complain about. They choose a very nice body double...:ninja:

I agree with your post Bluestar. The "But he's Harry Potter!" thing is dumb as hell. It remains me of those ladies at the hairdresser who talk about sitcom characters like there were their best friends or neighbors or something. :rolleyes:
 
for some reason, i can imagine being jame bond in the very future, because peierrce bosnan (typo?) is the first jame bond i've seen and eww the hairy chest....
or a beer-fied couch potato (no offendce... it just strike into my head like a zap... sry if anything)

and of course to post 58.... of course NOT!!!! hahaha i've seen better guy then him.. trust me lol
 
I'd like to see this play. I haven't read one bad review of it yet.
 
I think Voldemort must have cursed him pretty bad because that's the most misproportioned male torso I've ever seen.
 
^not a fan at any male on tv so far but how so????
dont usually understand these concept.
 
BTW- None of the naked pics are real. I recently heard that NO naked photos will be taken. To see little Dan you have to go in person!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,499
Messages
15,187,353
Members
86,392
Latest member
Sashalove93
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->