rickowensbride
Member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2009
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 0
As a Londoner, I do feel a great sense of pride towards POP - though its not my favourite mag. It isn't just an average glossy. I feel it came to be the cult-like magazine that it was via a group of 'mates' who shared that same unique vision and attitude.
To Katie Grand, Lee Swillingham et al, POP was an opportunity to put Brits back on the editorial top after years and years of being Vogued and Tatlered out. It bought together that perfect combination of an I-d and Dazed attitude with some serious advertising, creative vision, glamour and 'gloss'. It's also a perfect example of what some unbelievable creative visionaries can do with out that lofty Conde Nast budget. They have created some iconic images without laying out half of what the Conde group would
To understand what I am talking about I really recommend checking out Katie Grand's editor's letter in the final edition of Pop with her as EIC. She totally addresses the fact that there perhaps was too many random animals and too much neon but it came to be such a success from a group of people who just wanted to have fun with it and share their aesthetic - or even their LOVE.
POP can also be credited for making major stars out of Mert and Marcus, Agyness Deyn and that whole Boombox phase that will undoubtedly be in history books in years to come in the same way our generation would look at Studio 54. It bought all of this to POP culture - people who may not even know POP would have to be living under a rock to not have noticed that crazy neon period in 2004/2005.
To Katie Grand, Lee Swillingham et al, POP was an opportunity to put Brits back on the editorial top after years and years of being Vogued and Tatlered out. It bought together that perfect combination of an I-d and Dazed attitude with some serious advertising, creative vision, glamour and 'gloss'. It's also a perfect example of what some unbelievable creative visionaries can do with out that lofty Conde Nast budget. They have created some iconic images without laying out half of what the Conde group would
To understand what I am talking about I really recommend checking out Katie Grand's editor's letter in the final edition of Pop with her as EIC. She totally addresses the fact that there perhaps was too many random animals and too much neon but it came to be such a success from a group of people who just wanted to have fun with it and share their aesthetic - or even their LOVE.
POP can also be credited for making major stars out of Mert and Marcus, Agyness Deyn and that whole Boombox phase that will undoubtedly be in history books in years to come in the same way our generation would look at Studio 54. It bought all of this to POP culture - people who may not even know POP would have to be living under a rock to not have noticed that crazy neon period in 2004/2005.