jeanclaude
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2012
- Messages
- 4,794
- Reaction score
- 14,243
These 3 people were "models" in 1981???? OMG!! A mannequin would have looked way better!
alamy.com
alamy.com
They are not bad. For me they sometimes have a hard time embracing frivolity and the light spirit that comes with it.
I don’t know if it’s Belgian or specific to a certain school of design.
At one point I adore it. In the 2000’s that vision was great. It’s timeless in a way but today I think it’s less relevant.
The great thing about Pieter is only that he works with a Photographer that injects a certain sensuality and lightness in his work.
Raf at Prada is a lost cause because everybody is taking themselves quite seriously there in a way.
yes those 4 years 2008/2012 (wasn’t that impressed in the early days) of Raf at JS were fabulous. Even the Navy line was great.The clothes under Raf Simons at Jil Sander were terrific, with a subtle sensuality and just the right balance between modernity and timelessness - Then again, we know at this point what a difference it makes to have Patrick van Ommeslaeghe as director of womenswear there, compared to Matthieu Blazy later on at Calvin Klein; it was very clear to me why I didn't like it, at all…
Love thisThese 3 people were "models" in 1981???? OMG!! A mannequin would have looked way better!
![]()
alamy.com
That's how most nepo babies look before plastic surgery.These 3 people were "models" in 1981???? OMG!! A mannequin would have looked way better!
![]()
alamy.com

Those are good looks, I would say tailored and streamlined, you can already see the Gucci by Tom Ford jnfluence.Versace was never the place for "sharp and focused" either.
What excuse me lol !!!!!!!!!! no way you say this makes me cry in 2025:
Gianni was going in a new sharp and focused direction before his death its well documented and written of and he always had moments going more clean even classic and then maximal extroverted since 80´s.
We need to see beyond the average mainstream idea of what Gianni Versace was he did many things and it's not all dumb blond caricature.
View attachment 1430917View attachment 1430919View attachment 1430920View attachment 1430921View attachment 1430922View attachment 1430923View attachment 1430924View attachment 1430925View attachment 1430926View attachment 1430927View attachment 1430928
View attachment 1430917View attachment 1430919View attachment 1430920View attachment 1430921View attachment 1430922View attachment 1430923View attachment 1430924View attachment 1430925View attachment 1430926View attachment 1430927View attachment 1430928View attachment 1430929View attachment 1430930View attachment 1430931View attachment 1430932View attachment 1430933View attachment 1430934View attachment 1430935View attachment 1430936View attachment 1430937View attachment 1430938 View attachment 1430939 View attachment 1430940 View attachment 1430941 View attachment 1430942
Hum the male model is a a model, but it’s pretty obvious the two women are Gianni workers who presumably tailored and assembled the suit…These 3 people were "models" in 1981???? OMG!! A mannequin would have looked way better!
![]()
alamy.com
Probably. Avedon at that time was already working with a set of supermodels so what you say makes sense.Hum the male model is a a model, but it’s pretty obvious the two women are Gianni workers who presumably tailored and assembled the suit…
Or I am being wooshed ?
Disagree 100000000%,Those are good looks, I would say tailored and streamlined, you can already see the Gucci by Tom Ford influence.
But imho Versace was not searched after for their sharp and focused looks. People had Calvin Klein and Donna Karan for that.













. 










Honestly i think the concept is that Tailor ladies doing his suit because they are wearing uniform and holding part of the suit as in made by hand ....Hum the male model is a a model, but it’s pretty obvious the two women are Gianni workers who presumably tailored and assembled the suit…
Or I am being wooshed ?
You clearly never shopped there those years early 90´s when he was alive my sister went to high school prom in Versace it was simple black dress no medusa no print ...its like saying armani is only soccer players style and emporio armani logo underwear .....or Hermes is only wag wives ala Victoria Beckham (t*ts on a stick) while you have very old money clients buying hermes bags for years before and after.Bro is called "The Kings of Color" for a reason. I mean you don't go to this brand for something sharp and focused yet sexy à la Tom Ford or his godfathers Halston/Yves Saint Laurent.
Armani simplicity is as much of a brand myth as is versace baroque coco.^ It’s easier for me to dismiss Versace as someone who adores Armani and designers who focus on simplicity. I’ll never buy Versace, but that doesn’t mean I overlook his legacy. But come one, let’s be honest, Versace was never a pioneer of “sharp and focused” fashion, literally no designer takes note from Gianni regarding those aspects. You have Halston, Yves that are the biggest inspirations for Tom Ford.




















I mean experimenting and changing styles in design isn't the end of the world or anything special, as long as the designer has a strong enough code and POV to still make something look like their own. Armani may be inspired by Japanese aesthetics even back in late 70s, from artists like Utamuro, Kurosawa or Miyake but that doesn't make him a maximalist like Kansai Yamamoto or Kenzo. Gianni, Karl or even John Galliano all had their high&low phases, but even when they made things look simpler it still didn't change their signature aesthetic. The point is Gianni didn’t influence the next generations of designers by the clothes in the pics you commented.Armani simplicity is as much of a brand myth as is versace baroque coco.
I deal in facts as much as they are available, feelings of dismissal are great for kitchen table talk but in a discussion one must be ready to know facts that are contrary to our feelings on that subject.
the pictures speak for themselves and vintage gianni versace you can see the construction i cant bring you to the lake and drink the water also for you that you have to do for yourself. (that research you have to see & do for yourself)
I don't know in how many designer collection meetings you have been but my experience is different in regards to Gianni Verage influence on cut and technique and that goes beyond chainmail with lace or prints.
I did not speak of inspiration to TOM i replied that TOM´s influence on Verace was not a string argument as Giaani was doing clean cuts years before since starting his brand in the 80´s
The conversation is not about who influenced Tom Ford
Armani (young and old) did many tacky things and very loud things i am not going to show all the examples you're the expert any ways
Case in point my love:
Armani ss 1995
View attachment 1431189View attachment 1431195View attachment 1431190View attachment 1431192View attachment 1431191View attachment 1431193
versace ss 1995
View attachment 1431196View attachment 1431197View attachment 1431198View attachment 1431199
See why feeling don't matter when you have facts lol
Sympathy for mister Armani does not mean one is blind to the facts that the brand is loved for more what it can be than what it was or is right now.
Same can be said for Gianni to discret his work as x in order to elevate another when clearly the facts show he was more modern at times than the myth of Armani per example.
To truly compare one must know the full scope of both brand creators well, not just your favorite one.
I mean experimenting and changing styles in design isn't the end of the world or anything special, as long as the designer has a strong enough code and POV to still make something look like their own. Armani may be inspired by Japanese aesthetics even back in late 70s, from artists like Utamuro, Kurosawa or Miyake but that doesn't make him a maximalist like Kansai Yamamoto or Kenzo. Gianni, Karl or even John Galliano all had their high&low phases, but even when they made things look simpler it still didn't change their signature aesthetic. The point is Gianni didn’t influence the next generations of designers by the clothes in the pics you commented.
My mistake was joining this thread, it's Dario Vitale and not even someone better, another landfill for some bizarre debates after that Ancora thread went hiatus.












