Designers Switching Houses & Moving to New Brands | Page 172 | the Fashion Spot

Designers Switching Houses & Moving to New Brands

i see it bit different
The longer you are in a brand more chances you get the be a senior designer via friends politics or as people come and go you lay low the new incoming leader gives you promotion as you know how the company works is easier than recruiting from outside.


all this does not create the best senior designers either i have to say as the best people don't always get the promotion or hired

Ancora guy , the new mc Queen guy etc have all been 10 year plus at x brands look what they brought forward.


longevity at one brand does not equal quality of ideas , designers are also people the get comfortable and just want to go home on time to watch netflix to decompress form toxic coworkers or directors or go out to dinner with friend s or be meet the new grindr date.
You don't need quality talented designers when the mass public will buy whatever slop they're served WITHOUT QUESTION. Especially when the clothes aren't even the things they're buying.

As long as you give them logos or anything that'll make them feel part of the 'rich people club' they will continue to buy.
 
You don't need quality talented designers when the mass public will buy whatever slop they're served WITHOUT QUESTION. Especially when the clothes aren't even the things they're buying.

As long as you give them logos or anything that'll make them feel part of the 'rich people club' they will continue to buy.
Partially true because what moves mass market is also the innovation or more intellectual ideas at the top that is less understood.

LV is good example of a difficult to understand designer as Nicolas but his experiments bring details and elements for the mass collection to be just new enough.

sure as a brand you can stretch doing logo goods without innovation or intellectual progress (hype) at the top tier but i only can work so long before the cooling of the brand starts as it happened with gucci is perfect example.

stagnation of creativity is not good for a brand no matter how well know your logo is.

Miuccia Prada :

It's easy to speak to a small niche audience, but it's more interesting challenge to speak to a wider audience with the same quality of ideas.

like it or not in a way even with Raf spoiling prada lol she did this with miu miu especially the miu miu early ideas and first adv is the same girl we see now with all these miu miu logo on products the last show was difficult again now she has a bigger audience i am sure it was on purpose to do a more difficult miu miu from the repertoire of the brand history.

balenciaga biker bag was very niche but look how many years later its so mass, same as celine luggage bag was etc

you can design with integrity and then have product be widely popular and not every one understand its concept but that does not matter i also don't know how my Iphone works or what the design concept was lol
 
So whatever happened to the rumors about MGC moving back to Valentino? Are they still waiting for her non-compete clause to finish or was this not serious?
 
So whatever happened to the rumors about MGC moving back to Valentino? Are they still waiting for her non-compete clause to finish or was this not serious?

Alessandro Michele is staying there until the end of his contract so next 2-3 years uless new CEO will just kick him out (unlikely). I've heard MCG is retiring and focusing on costume design for ballet in Rome...
 
Alessandro Michele is staying there until the end of his contract so next 2-3 years uless new CEO will just kick him out (unlikely). I've heard MCG is retiring and focusing on costume design for ballet in Rome...

SUN DeLuxe​


Q2 25 and H1 25 will be very worrying, and 2026 will not be better.

The key mantras of the industry today:

Creative Directors: if you have been successful (for unspecified reasons that cannot be analyzed in order to avoid to discover the grey reality) in the brand X you must be successful in the brand Y. While they are rigid and stubborn and unable to have immersive experiences in the brands and let them help evolve their views. JW Anderson is the latest example, even if he seems “just a good boy”. The partnership with Luca Guadagnino is an example of how things could derail quickly if Bialobos doesn’t keep the reins tight. Blazy will be the same at Chanel. And Demna at Gucci (without the “good boy”).

And Alessandro Michele who seems to be in his way out at Valentino
(it will take some time). Recruiters never take into consideration soft skills for this key role. They continue to pick full of oneself designers hiding behind a following of cheerleaders clapping at them on the social media, only waiting for free gifts and trips.

CEOs: the most important thing now is to pass the buck to somebody else, so that they can just survive and take bonuses until they can. They know the system is doomed. They themselves have undermined it at its foundations. So the fault of the imminent disaster will have to officially be on somebody else shoulders. They created hierarchies in companies based on this assumption, not to make them work.
I think he has initial 3 years so he did 1 year already on april 4th .......basically 2 years left

Year 2 if its still this bad they will lose patience for sure and won't wait till 3th year also because the value of the company will go down and kering will (if they still can afford it) pay less for Valentino even if its a swap for shares in kering or a combo of the two.

As i said here few months ago they were fighting just as at Gucci
Where Jacobo left first Oct 2019 as Gucci CEO sided with LALLO much like now Valentino owners sided with LALLO again.
3 years later LALLO left November 23, 2022 gucci as well after a year of €9.7bn in 2021 the growth was not as expected.

So the crack at gucci one could say took one year for the frustions to come to a point that LALLO left /they agree to part ways much for the reason as now he would not want to change his point of view in design to meet market sh*t or owners request.

Therefor i would not be surprised if end of his second year at Valentino they will do something drastically to improve the outlook, they seen with Gucci Ancora that sticking too long with a bet that's not paying off has bigger consequences than making a new one.
 

Pucknews​

My Funny Valentino​

Amid tumult in Valentino’s executive ranks and uncertainty in the luxury market, new Kering C.E.O. Luca de Meo has several options before him: reshuffle the team, buy Valentino outright… or simply wait and see.
Luca de Meo

De Meo, a turnaround expert credited with reviving Renault, theoretically has more than two years to decide on Valentino, but if the past is prologue, he’s proven to be a swift and decisive executive. Photo: Nathan Laine/Bloomberg/Getty Images

July 7, 2025

Last week, there were a number of reports indicating that Valentino C.E.O. Jacopo Venturini had exited the business—so many, in fact, that the company, which is owned by Mayhoola, had to issue a statement revealing that the sixtysomething executive, who was recruited from Gucci in 2020, was actually on sick leave. Venturini’s health has been a subject of speculation for months, even dating back to the early days of Alessandro Michele’s arrival at the Roman brand in early 2024. And, in many ways, this terribly unfortunate turn has highlighted the larger and complex questions surrounding both the brand and its current ownership structure.
Michele and Venturini, a merchandiser by trade, were partners at Gucci, and their reunion was highly anticipated. In the early days of Michele’s Valentino, I could see Venturini’s prowess sprouting up via the shoes and handbags. And yet nothing appeared to become a runaway hit.
After all, the collection entered the market at the worst moment for luxury fashion, perhaps ever. But the shoes and handbags were also, at times, overwhelmed by Michele’s designs, which were far more expensive (albeit better quality) than his Gucci wares, maybe attracting fewer diehards than expected. Valentino also undoubtedly lost a part of its base with Pierpaolo Piccioli’s departure.

I still have high hopes for Michele’s Valentino: the brand’s owners, Mayhoola, have confidence in him and his vision. But the market is simply different than it was a decade ago, when he proposed an entirely new way of dressing. These days, re-creating that magpie look is easier than ever, and consumers are far more comfortable buying secondhand and archival pieces. In 2024, Valentino’s revenue was a little more than $1.5 billion, a drop of about 2 percent from a year earlier. That’s hardly a slide, especially compared to many competitors, but the 22 percent decline in profit indicates that the business relied far more on promotions than in the previous year.
Will this impact the strategy at Kering? There was recently chatter that the company, which owns 30 percent of Valentino and has the option to acquire the business outright from Mayhoola, would absorb the brand by the end of this year, or early next.
This scenario was pooh-poohed by several insiders, who told me the group would wait as long as it could, for the most favorable climate, to buy Valentino. But that was all before the appointment of Luca de Meo as the new C.E.O. of Kering, effective in early September.


Luca Skywalker​

De Meo, a turnaround expert credited with reviving Renault, theoretically has more than two years to decide on Valentino. But if the past is prologue, he’s proven to be a swift and decisive executive. More than a decade ago, François-Henri Pinault streamlined his father’s group to focus purely on luxury, steadily folding adjacent and synergistic businesses (eyewear, beauty) into the larger operation. De Meo, with Pinault’s counsel, will now undoubtedly employ a host of advisors to help reimagine the business for the future by asking loftier questions of the business.
To wit: Are fashion brands the future? Can the tremendous growth in leather goods ever be re-created? Do other, more logical acquisition targets or merger partners exist? Valentino’s future lies with the answers.

Before Kering adds more brands to its fold or considers strategic partnerships, however, sales must rebound. There is a scenario in which de Meo maintains Francesca Bellettini and Jean-Marc Duplaix as deputy C.E.O.s to focus on that challenge, but that would mean they’re willing to stick around. Bellettini, who was integral to many of the changes implemented at Kering over the past two years, and once seemed like an heir apparent, must be weighing her options. While I can’t imagine her moving to LVMH—she’s too big of a force—there are big opportunities for someone with her track record. Prada’s C.E.O., Gianfranco D’Attis, just left, for instance. Armani is in transition.

I find it hard to believe that Bellettini would have an easy time saying goodbye to the designers she appointed, or the executives who are there because of her. Nevertheless, she may want to exit if all her work is about to be dismantled. Also, as I’ve mentioned before, de Meo will be able to attract extremely high-caliber executives. This is a guy who has people like Moncler’s Remo Ruffini and Brunello Cucinelli singing his praises to The Wall Street Journal. If he weren’t working for a direct competitor, I bet Louis Vuitton C.E.O. Pietro Beccari would be giving a quote, too. (They are car friends.) In the Italian executive world, he’s held in the highest regard.

Presumably that means he’ll also know what’s best for Valentino.
 
Last edited:
I don't think Kering will finalize the Valentino acquisition.
Kering financial situation is a disaster, the economical / political global climate is too uncertain to allow building and gaining loyalty towards customers, the tariffs and all the subsequent speculations are very off putting towards most consumers.
There is no way Demna will do a miracle and become Gucci saviour, ok better than Ancora and his team for sure in terms of sales and revenues but nothing remarkable, at least in the short team.
If I were Mayhoola I would be the first not to accept to finalize the acquisition simply because the cons are more and worse than the pros...
 
With Valentino not doing good and potentially doing worse, maybe KERING can use some cards to acquire the brand.

I’m sure L’Oreal would be interested though. They still owns Valentino beauty if I’m not mistaken.
 
Drumohr : Massimiliano Giornetti

I guess Mr Giornetti left Polimoda..
 
Meryll Rogge rumored at Marni:
Meryll Rogge Tipped as Potential Creative Director at Marni
The Belgian designer, who recently won the ANDAM Grand Prize, is said to be in the running to succeed Francesco Risso at the creative helm of the Italian brand.

By Lily Templeton, Luisa Zargani
July 11, 2025, 2:13pm


Another potential successor to Francesco Risso at Marni has emerged: Meryll Rogge.

In the wake of her ANDAM Grand Prize win on June 30, the Belgian designer’s name has been circulated as a contender for the top creative role at the Italian brand, owned by the OTB Group.

The company declined to comment.

In the past 12 months, the Ghent, Belgium-based designer has been garnering much attention.

In addition to the ANDAM prize, she was named designer of the year at the 2024 Belgian Fashion Awards and was a 2025 Woolmark Prize finalist.

Her designs were spotted on the likes of Dua Lipa, Chloé Sévigny and Rihanna and some have been recently acquired by MoMu Antwerp, Brussels’ Fashion & Lace Museum and the Metropolitan Museum in New York.

A 2008 graduate of Antwerp’s Royal Academy of Fine Arts who dreamed of being an illustrator as a child, Rogge swapped paint for textile swatches when moving to New York. After working her way up to lead designer at Marc Jacobs over seven years, she was back in Antwerp working for Dries Van Noten as head of women’s design in 2014 before going solo in 2020.

She has held presentations for her eponymous collections in Paris since 2021 and staged her first runway show in March, showing a collection inspired by vintage wallpaper prints and destroyed art that read as fun and hopeful.

A handful of candidates have emerged since Marni said in June it was parting ways with Francesco Risso, who held the role of creative director since 2016.

Swedish designer Ellen Hodakova Larsson, who won the 2024 edition of the LVMH Prize for Young Designers for her upcycled creations, is another name thrown in the ring.

The brand is now led by Stefano Rosso, who was named chief executive officer in May last year.

He is the son of Renzo Rosso, the founder and chairman of OTB, which also controls the Diesel, Jil Sander, Maison Margiela, and Viktor & Rolf brands, production arms Staff International and Brave Kid, and holds a stake in the Amiri brand.

Several changes have been taking place within the OTB Group over the last year and in early 2025.

Following the exit of John Galliano, Glenn Martens made his debut as creative director of Maison Margiela with an Artisanal collection honoring the house’s legacy of provocative, avant-garde fashions while also sticking an unwashed thumb in the eye of the numbing quiet luxury juggernaut. He will also continue to design Diesel.

In February, former Fendi chairman and CEO Serge Brunschwig was named CEO of Jil Sander, succeeding Luca Lo Curzio, who exited the brand last November to join K-Way as CEO. Brunschwig was also appointed chief strategy officer of OTB. Also, in March, Simone Bellotti succeeded Luke and Lucie Meier as creative director of Jil Sander, joining from Bally.

Last year, while Diesel, Maison Margiela and the direct-to-consumer channel all reported growth, the slowdown in China and a 15 percent decrease in the group’s wholesale channel impacted OTB’s turnover, which decreased 5.2 percent to 1.8 billion euros, compared with 1.9 billion euros in 2023.

The group does not break out sales by brand.
WWD
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,379
Messages
15,259,350
Members
88,356
Latest member
hoy
Back
Top