Dior Menswear S/S 2026 Paris | Page 7 | the Fashion Spot

Dior Menswear S/S 2026 Paris

I'm not blown away at all, but I'm not sure I'd call it a terrible debut either.
Like some of his Loewe shows, it's mostly a styling exercise—and when there's more of a distinct design element, it starts to feel overly contrived. Benjamin Bruno is still doing an excellent job, which makes me wonder what JWA's shows would look like without his involvement.

The collection is quite commercial for the most part. But honestly, can they get rid of the "Dior" branding on everything? It really cheapens the whole effort. The bags and shoes are terrible and clearly need significant improvement.

I'm both scared and curious about the womenswear. Based on this collection, it doesn't feel like a radical break from his work at Loewe—more like a continuation.
 
I couldn't watch it yesterday because I had better things to do but now that I pay attention... it's not bad at all. But I have two main issues here: Ashley should really reconsider her mens castings. these little kids are not able to elevate anything. And while the whole picture is good, I can't even point out one thing I remember after 10 minutes. It feels sort of soulless? I don't know. I still think that you can't debut at Dior with a menswear show and let's be honest, I don't think that fashion people are starving for Dior Homme. We all want the womenswear and couture.

I'm going to be downvoted for this but I had the impression that MGC debut was stronger? lolllll -I'm not saying it was better-
 
I'm going to be downvoted for this but I had the impression that MGC debut was stronger? lolllll -I'm not saying it was better-
I think the MGC it’s more iconic at least, same for Raf.

Of all the Dior debuts, this has been the worst (and I like him).

For the casting, I think it was the highlight. Most them were so beautiful.

I was surprised he said he didn’t know much about Dior… I think a designer should know everything about fashion history. That kinda disappointed me too and that’s maybe why he chose the basic Dior book for the sneakpeak, the one that you read when you are 15.

Idk, maybe he’s not as deep as I thought?
 
I think the MGC it’s more iconic at least, same for Raf.

Of all the Dior debuts, this has been the worse (and I like him).

For the casting, I think it was the highlight. Most them were so beautiful.
yes of course they’re beautiful. Ashley has a great eye for beauty for I can’t imagine a man who can afford Dior watching the show and saying: Oh I want to look like these 18 years old boys!
 
yes of course they’re beautiful. Ashley has a great eye for beauty for I can’t imagine a man who can afford Dior watching the show and saying: Oh I want to look like these 18 years old boys!
Hmm, I don’t know…

I think the icon of the Dior Man customer is somebody like Cristiano Ronaldo for what I’ve seen. They don’t even see the shows I’d dare to say.

For menswear I believe there’s a huge gap between the shows and the final customer.

The women’s might enjoy going to the fashion show, having a lookbook with the pictures… but for menswear, and from my experience, I don’t think that happens much.

Also for the women, I feel they don’t aspire to look like most of the (current) models, no? I think they rather look like a celeb than a model. The model look is more niche.
 
I'm curious whether the female clients from the Middle East are aware that he has penis vases, penis keyrings, and male model frontal posters on his CV, or if they simply don't care.
He is gay is that not enough lol
Anyways Middle East clients have there own gays in the middle east around these female clients doing their hair & decorating their apartments etc etc

if your travel in the middle east you will see or just have a look on social media :-)
 
BOF

Jonathan Anderson’s Grunge Aristocracy at Dior​

Colliding artistry with calculated artlessness, the designer’s debut offered up a great appetiser for a more complex meal to come, writes Tim Blanks.
Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026.

Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026. (Getty Images)

By
Tim Blanks
27 June 2025
BoF PROFESSIONAL

PARIS — The enormous tent constructed in the Place Vauban for Jonathan Anderson’s debut at Dior was printed with a silvery evocation of the past, a monochrome image of Christian Dior’s decorous couture salon.

Fast forward to the present, 75 years later. That tent had been exhaustively climate-controlled to allow for the hanging of two paintings by Jean Siméon Chardin, the 18th century artist who is regarded as the master of the still life. He was a favourite of Dior’s, Anderson’s too. The Chardins were his idea. So was the inspiration for the showspace, clad in velvet like the Gemäldegalerie in Berlin, home to one of the finest collections of European art from the 13th to the 19th century. One Chardin came from the Louvre, the other from the National Gallery of Scotland. Reflect for a moment on the logistics involved in transporting monstrously valuable works of art to a tent packed with an unruly, heatstruck audience for one hour on a Friday afternoon in Paris and you’ll maybe garner some notion of the political and financial power that a fashion conglomerate like LVMH, which owns Dior, now wields. Ah yes, the present.

Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026
Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026. (Spotlight/Launchmetrics.com)
And the future? Well, for that single stretch of showtime, it rested in Anderson’s hands. He’s been cast as Dior’s saviour in a challenging market — and is the first to oversee women’s, men’s and haute couture collections since Monsieur Dior himself first experimented with menswear. Unsurprisingly, Anderson has been soft-pedalling expectations. “You have to, because no one gives anyone any time anymore,” he conceded at a preview earlier this week. In another exchange, he said, “My idea is to be slightly optimistic, it’s not going to happen overnight. We have to be realistic today.” But his attempt at lowering the temperature was clearly unsuccessful. His audience was littered with pop stars, movie stars and a full platoon of fashion peers, many of whom were on their feet at show’s end.

Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026
Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026. (Spotlight/Launchmetrics.com)
Anderson was insistent that Dior was something alien to him. “It’s not a character that I know.” But that’s what seduced him. “It’s like buying a chateau in the South of France that you saw on a website, a very British thing to do. It’s beautiful, but it needs so much renovation. You have to start somewhere, and as you go, you realise, ‘Wow! It’s amazing what they did in the 18th century with door handles,’ and then you find the next thing and the next thing.” And those “next things” were the years of input from all the designers who have worked for Dior over the decades. To isolate the most striking carryover from the past in Anderson’s debut collection: Maria Grazia Chiuri’s wildly successful book tote reappears rendered as the covers of specific titles, In Cold Blood, Bonjour Tristesse, and, luridly best of all, Dracula. (“Because it’s Irish,” he said archly.) He compared the learning process to doing a PhD in Dior. What did he come away with? “I feel the name is bigger than the individual designer. It was always like that. So that was the whole idea for me.”

Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026
Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026. (Spotlight/Launchmetrics.com)
There will undoubtedly be plenty of people who look at what Anderson showed on Friday and question his concept of permanence. “My idea was to decode it to recode it,” he explained, sort of. “That’s how the collection was built.” Take the first look, practically a manifesto in one outfit. “How I feel I’m going to tackle men,” Anderson declared. “Formality, history, the material, Irishness.” The cargo shorts were panniered with the extravagant folds of the Delft dress from 1948, originally carved from 15 metres of duchesse satin, duplicated for today in undyed denim. The jacket featured the classic Bar silhouette, cut here from Donegal tweed. The model sported a formal stock tie. “An English stock,” Anderson explained, “the French is looser. I like the idea of something that makes you lift your head up. There’s an etherealness to the formality.” The shoes were based on the sandals he wore to school in the summer. In other words, a weird but winning fusion which spanned the decades between the Frenchman and the Irishman.

“For me, it’s about a quiet radicalism,”
Anderson said. “For the customer, this is already going to be something that is pretty wild, but in my head, it’s normal.” Why is it easy for me to imagine Christian Dior saying something similar 75 years ago? And if my proposed compatibility still seems like a bridge too far, there’s their shared obsession with the 18th century. “I got the guy who’s been sourcing things for me for years to find me the best 18th century menswear, and then we meticulously recreated it. There was no point in changing the fit. When I saw it, I thought, ‘That’s Dior. Let’s just put it up there as a thing.’” Like his own version of Martin Margiela’s “Replications” which he loved so much when he was starting out in fashion. Rebecca Mead’s profile in the New Yorker earlier this year quoted Anderson saying this: “Authenticity is invaluable. Originality is nonexistent. Steal, adapt, borrow. It doesn’t matter where one takes things from. It’s where one takes them to.” So Anderson showed his delicately toned, edibly alluring duplication of the jacket and waistcoat from an aristocrat’s summer day look for the court of Louis XV with a dress shirt, black jeans and unlaced Dior trainers.

Like that first look, it was a provocative encapsulation of the idea of personal style, or how you put things together to express yourself. A midnight blue velvet tail coat over chambray jeans, for instance. Or a delicately frogged white shirt over white jeans. Artistry and calculated artlessness, all of it set to a sensational Frederic Sanchez soundtrack that swung from Springsteen to Little Simz. Velvet, denim, sandals and a stock tie – “I would love to be able to wear that,” Anderson said. “Every time I’ve done a menswear show, I’ve always wanted to be able to do something I would love to be able to pull off. For me this is a fantasy, because it has to be. I find each person in the show equally attractive because I think they embody the ‘thing.’ I believe it, and if I believe it, then I want to dress like it.” Fashion as an act of faith: Anderson mastered that challenge at Loewe, and, if early reactions are any indication, he’ll be able to translate that mastery to Dior.

Finding the future in the past is not a particularly novel concept, but if I think for a moment that everything Anderson has done is almost like a movie, it clarifies how he was able to draw such an extraordinary cast of characters to Loewe and his own brand. One of them, director and frequent collaborator Luca Guadagnino, has been tracking him all week with a film crew. The designer talked about the looks in the show that were pure youthful street as his acknowledgement of Jean-Luc Godard and the nouvelle vague that transformed French cinema and French style, from New Look to New Wave. Anderson said it’s also about him getting used to living in Paris, trying to work out what he loves about the city. “I’m on Île Saint-Louis and there’s something about this idea of tight grey corridors that have light at the end. No matter when you see people, they’re always backlit. And everything looks great backlit. I find it fascinating because it feels like cinema somehow, and really that is how we approached the challenge.”

The city is currently plastered with posters of artist Jean-Michel Basquiat and footballer Kylian Mbappé, the faces of the new Dior man (or, as Anderson says of Mbappé, “a new vision of France”). “I have to find a new language,” Anderson said. “It’s going to take time, and I don’t want to be rushed. Anything is possible. At the end of the day, it’s a job. And you always have to remind yourself that you love the work and you’re gonna get the job done.” Consider this debut a great appetiser for the much more complicated meal to come.
 
Last edited:
^ I still can’t believe the outfit Rihanna wore was Dior. None of it made sense from the colours, to the weird lapel situation to the layers. Mia and Natalia’s were just nice, but there was something cheap about the proportions. The colours didn’t help either.

Probably coming across as really pessimistic, but it’s hard not to be. Dior should be dealt with an air of maturity especially with the ambassadors, but not in a maudlin or gimmicky kind of way. MGC botched it a bit too with the disparity between the chosen models and then the surplus of reps that were pushed everywhere and every time. Slight identity crisis, so hopefully JW can work something out but right now I’m feeling like a cracked egg about it
For me, when shows are not styled as silhouettes and in general I would say, celebrities shouldn’t wear total runway looks.

This is something that I loved from Karl at Chanel: the celebrities didn’t wear the full runway looks.

For me, celebrities are there to inspire the mass and to make the collection have a second life in another context beyond the runway looks, the campaigns and magazines.

We see it at Vuitton! Most of the women there can’t pull of NG’s clothes because it’s not their sensibility. Sometimes, just wearing a pant, a dress or a jacket from the runway is enough! While for me Lous and the Yakuza and Jennifer Connelly are fabulous in Vuitton, the best ambassador for NG are MAS, Brune Buonomano and Marina Fois because they wears the stuff how it’s supposed to be worn.

And yes, Rihanna looked a mess. And she looked a mess because they tried to make a statement. When you are wearing basics (which is tbh what the whole audience wore) you should look chic and comfortable.

If we compare the audience at Dior to the audience at Louis Vuitton, there’s a huge gap! They may not look stylish in a fashion way at Vuitton but they looked great and comfortable!

The shirt with the ties without the jacket is literally upsetting me!

I’m still curious about his Dior. Because the girls he dressed at Loewe were fantastic. My frustration at Dior was always the gap. When I travelled, went to events, the women I saw in Dior were grown women. On the runway, it was children and in attendance they looked like bored housewives.
Tbh, I’m more curious about the womenswear because Dior is still very particular.
 
Him saying he doesnt know dior is confusing since its been presented this was his dream.

So its true they threw him at Dior to stop him from going to Gucci. They shouldve let him go and just bit the bullet and hired Hedi Slimane.

Listen just apologize to Hedi - give him a new jet and maybe he will return the Arnaults phone calls.
 
BOF

Jonathan Anderson’s Grunge Aristocracy at Dior​

Colliding artistry with calculated artlessness, the designer’s debut offered up a great appetiser for a more complex meal to come, writes Tim Blanks.
Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026.

Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026. (Getty Images)

By
Tim Blanks
27 June 2025
BoF PROFESSIONAL

PARIS — The enormous tent constructed in the Place Vauban for Jonathan Anderson’s debut at Dior was printed with a silvery evocation of the past, a monochrome image of Christian Dior’s decorous couture salon.

Fast forward to the present, 75 years later. That tent had been exhaustively climate-controlled to allow for the hanging of two paintings by Jean Siméon Chardin, the 18th century artist who is regarded as the master of the still life. He was a favourite of Dior’s, Anderson’s too. The Chardins were his idea. So was the inspiration for the showspace, clad in velvet like the Gemäldegalerie in Berlin, home to one of the finest collections of European art from the 13th to the 19th century. One Chardin came from the Louvre, the other from the National Gallery of Scotland. Reflect for a moment on the logistics involved in transporting monstrously valuable works of art to a tent packed with an unruly, heatstruck audience for one hour on a Friday afternoon in Paris and you’ll maybe garner some notion of the political and financial power that a fashion conglomerate like LVMH, which owns Dior, now wields. Ah yes, the present.

Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026
Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026. (Spotlight/Launchmetrics.com)
And the future? Well, for that single stretch of showtime, it rested in Anderson’s hands. He’s been cast as Dior’s saviour in a challenging market — and is the first to oversee women’s, men’s and haute couture collections since Monsieur Dior himself first experimented with menswear. Unsurprisingly, Anderson has been soft-pedalling expectations. “You have to, because no one gives anyone any time anymore,” he conceded at a preview earlier this week. In another exchange, he said, “My idea is to be slightly optimistic, it’s not going to happen overnight. We have to be realistic today.” But his attempt at lowering the temperature was clearly unsuccessful. His audience was littered with pop stars, movie stars and a full platoon of fashion peers, many of whom were on their feet at show’s end.

Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026
Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026. (Spotlight/Launchmetrics.com)
Anderson was insistent that Dior was something alien to him. “It’s not a character that I know.” But that’s what seduced him. “It’s like buying a chateau in the South of France that you saw on a website, a very British thing to do. It’s beautiful, but it needs so much renovation. You have to start somewhere, and as you go, you realise, ‘Wow! It’s amazing what they did in the 18th century with door handles,’ and then you find the next thing and the next thing.” And those “next things” were the years of input from all the designers who have worked for Dior over the decades. To isolate the most striking carryover from the past in Anderson’s debut collection: Maria Grazia Chiuri’s wildly successful book tote reappears rendered as the covers of specific titles, In Cold Blood, Bonjour Tristesse, and, luridly best of all, Dracula. (“Because it’s Irish,” he said archly.) He compared the learning process to doing a PhD in Dior. What did he come away with? “I feel the name is bigger than the individual designer. It was always like that. So that was the whole idea for me.”

Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026
Dior Menswear Spring/Summer 2026. (Spotlight/Launchmetrics.com)
There will undoubtedly be plenty of people who look at what Anderson showed on Friday and question his concept of permanence. “My idea was to decode it to recode it,” he explained, sort of. “That’s how the collection was built.” Take the first look, practically a manifesto in one outfit. “How I feel I’m going to tackle men,” Anderson declared. “Formality, history, the material, Irishness.” The cargo shorts were panniered with the extravagant folds of the Delft dress from 1948, originally carved from 15 metres of duchesse satin, duplicated for today in undyed denim. The jacket featured the classic Bar silhouette, cut here from Donegal tweed. The model sported a formal stock tie. “An English stock,” Anderson explained, “the French is looser. I like the idea of something that makes you lift your head up. There’s an etherealness to the formality.” The shoes were based on the sandals he wore to school in the summer. In other words, a weird but winning fusion which spanned the decades between the Frenchman and the Irishman.

“For me, it’s about a quiet radicalism,”
Anderson said. “For the customer, this is already going to be something that is pretty wild, but in my head, it’s normal.” Why is it easy for me to imagine Christian Dior saying something similar 75 years ago? And if my proposed compatibility still seems like a bridge too far, there’s their shared obsession with the 18th century. “I got the guy who’s been sourcing things for me for years to find me the best 18th century menswear, and then we meticulously recreated it. There was no point in changing the fit. When I saw it, I thought, ‘That’s Dior. Let’s just put it up there as a thing.’” Like his own version of Martin Margiela’s “Replications” which he loved so much when he was starting out in fashion. Rebecca Mead’s profile in the New Yorker earlier this year quoted Anderson saying this: “Authenticity is invaluable. Originality is nonexistent. Steal, adapt, borrow. It doesn’t matter where one takes things from. It’s where one takes them to.” So Anderson showed his delicately toned, edibly alluring duplication of the jacket and waistcoat from an aristocrat’s summer day look for the court of Louis XV with a dress shirt, black jeans and unlaced Dior trainers.

Like that first look, it was a provocative encapsulation of the idea of personal style, or how you put things together to express yourself. A midnight blue velvet tail coat over chambray jeans, for instance. Or a delicately frogged white shirt over white jeans. Artistry and calculated artlessness, all of it set to a sensational Frederic Sanchez soundtrack that swung from Springsteen to Little Simz. Velvet, denim, sandals and a stock tie – “I would love to be able to wear that,” Anderson said. “Every time I’ve done a menswear show, I’ve always wanted to be able to do something I would love to be able to pull off. For me this is a fantasy, because it has to be. I find each person in the show equally attractive because I think they embody the ‘thing.’ I believe it, and if I believe it, then I want to dress like it.” Fashion as an act of faith: Anderson mastered that challenge at Loewe, and, if early reactions are any indication, he’ll be able to translate that mastery to Dior.

Finding the future in the past is not a particularly novel concept, but if I think for a moment that everything Anderson has done is almost like a movie, it clarifies how he was able to draw such an extraordinary cast of characters to Loewe and his own brand. One of them, director and frequent collaborator Luca Guadagnino, has been tracking him all week with a film crew. The designer talked about the looks in the show that were pure youthful street as his acknowledgement of Jean-Luc Godard and the nouvelle vague that transformed French cinema and French style, from New Look to New Wave. Anderson said it’s also about him getting used to living in Paris, trying to work out what he loves about the city. “I’m on Île Saint-Louis and there’s something about this idea of tight grey corridors that have light at the end. No matter when you see people, they’re always backlit. And everything looks great backlit. I find it fascinating because it feels like cinema somehow, and really that is how we approached the challenge.”

The city is currently plastered with posters of artist Jean-Michel Basquiat and footballer Kylian Mbappé, the faces of the new Dior man (or, as Anderson says of Mbappé, “a new vision of France”). “I have to find a new language,” Anderson said. “It’s going to take time, and I don’t want to be rushed. Anything is possible. At the end of the day, it’s a job. And you always have to remind yourself that you love the work and you’re gonna get the job done.” Consider this debut a great appetiser for the much more complicated meal to come.
Grunge? Where?
 
I'll break from the mass on the Sabrina outfit...it looks so dated. The MGC Bar jacket + jeans combo is more modern and practical. The Sabrina outfit is lifted from Mad Men and the fabric somehow fell on the body in a weird way - no drape? clearly the classic wool+silk is a far superior fabric. and the shoes belonged in the 2010s at the very latest.

The men's outfits are much more interesting. By wearing these shorts men will have stronger quads as a byproduct: I would imagine that the shorts weigh a ton! Jokes aside I like the volume on these shorts. I'm also itchy on a couple of bags...
 
Do they make men's shoes in women's sizes? I somehow like the moccasins :wink:
 
This reference to "grunge" was their way of making the more basic, quite underwhelming styling choices FaSHUn. The way fashion high-mindedly appropriates grunge. Also love describing this as an appetizer, as in the best is yet to come instead of being a lukewarm Loewe x Uniqlo rehash.
 
I feel like there’s no reality to this, I don’t get the idea that it translates to a compelling way for men to dress. The pieces don’t come together as a cohesive whole, this is the difference between him and Hedi, whose end product was always crystal clear.
I think it's easy to forget DH under Hedi and how universal the product offer was for regular *** dudes while still being readily identifiable as 'fashion'. The same pair of distressed/coated jeans could be worn at school, grocery shopping, and even in nightclubs/bars without looking out of place yet still completely elevating your look. You could also say the same for many of the blazers, jackets, coats, shoes/sneakers and what have you.
 
I feel like I saw all this PR buzz just months ago when Alessandro Michele made his Valentino debut. All the interviews, the clips and rave reviews. The maximalist designer who led fashion was going to save the dying house of Valentino and bring forth a new wave. And now crickets. The customers were just not that into it. Barely anyone is wearing Valentino. The thing about Dior is it has a much bigger budget so maybe the PR, the interviews, the influencers, the hype machine around JWA will be enough. Dior is also more elevated as a brand, but there is still little in terms of commercial appeal or a fantasy with this debut.
 
I liked this a lot. While I do understand the mixed reactions, we really need to zoom out and look at Dior as a whole and understand that Jonathan has been tasked with undoing a corporate puzzle. Since its founding, each collection of the house has functioned with its own identity, design trajectory, product offering, etc. So, to step in with full control of each collection presents the ultimate challenge of unifying these distinct identities. No other designer that has stepped in has had to think through this, so of course his initial offering stands out from theirs.

We already know that Jonathan has many ideas and is not afraid of doing something avant garde in addition to displaying a real talent for merchandising and understanding product. Given that plus his long term relationship with the Arnaults, I think his tenure will look quite different from his peers. They're not playing the long game because they want to, they're playing it because they have to and it's clear that they're leaning into that, which is somewhat exciting. We forget that Tom Ford's initial offerings at Gucci weren't a hit right away. It takes time to build something substantial and coherent, especially at a house that has such radically different identities.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top