Donna Karan on studying fashion

Lena

etre soi-meme
Joined
Jun 9, 2002
Messages
23,855
Reaction score
7
Donna Karan speaks about studying and being a fashion designer during the "at the Parsons table" seminars, this may be of interest to all fashion design students browsing tFS careers & education forum

article by Marc Karimzadeh, published in wwd of today


NEW YORK — "You can't make a designer....I think you're born to design," said Donna Karan at Parsons The New School for Design on Thursday.

"It's a gift," she continued. "But what is a designer? How do you create a designer? How do you help support a designer? How do you allow that which is inside of you innately to come to fruition? Well, that's where we have teachers."

Karan was speaking in the final installment of the "At the Parsons Table" series in a conversation with Paul Goldberger, the school's dean. During the conversation, she discussed her career, her fashion and lifestyle philosophy and her take on fashion globalization. Along the way, she peppered the chat with unexpected tidbits, including the revelation that she once contemplated leaving New York, the city that informs so many of her designs, for Italy.

The event was held at The New School's Tishman Auditorium.

Karan recalled how she came to Parsons. She couldn't decide between the school and the Fashion Institute of Technology.

"They said if I was going to be an illustrator, I'd go to FIT, and if I was going to be a fashion designer, I'd go to Parsons," she said. "So I went to Women's Wear Daily and asked them, 'Could I have a summer job?' I was dismissed very quickly. [The head of WWD] says, 'My darling, you just absolutely do not know how to sketch. So I highly recommend you choose another field.' Well, I was mortified about that...because I really thought I was a brilliant illustrator, as I still do."

So Karan enrolled at Parsons, where she failed a course in draping and dropped out of the school to work for Anne Klein before starting her own label in 1984. (She received a bachelor's degree from Parsons in 1987.)

"[Anne Klein] says, 'You can sit anywhere you want,' and where did I want to sit in...the sample room," Karan said. "For me the sample room is where it's at, here it all happens."

Karan added that fashion is about touching people through the experience of fabric against the skin. To her, it is a sensual, "visceral" experience. While she respects the use of computer technology in fashion design, she stressed the importance to maintain the craft's "hand, soul and touch."

"I just came back from Israel. I had an amazing, amazing experience in the school in Israel," she said. "And I got so turned on. People were actually structuring lasts of shoes. We do not have the craft here in the States right now. We're all flying to Italy. We're flying to Mexico. I really do believe that outsourcing is brilliant, but where are the craftsmen here? Where are the hands? Where is the sculpture? And that's what I would love to put back into the school."

Karan said that while she loves scouring flea markets, she has become tired of fashions that are too overtly referential of bygone times.

"Where is the art? That's not designing, that's styling," she said. "I don't want to see another vintage dress."

Karan also explained why she chose to make New York such an important element in her design philosophy.

"I really feel that it wasn't about me, the ego Donna Karan," she said. "I had to remove myself from it. And I was sitting in my kitchen and there was a box there. And it said, 'Maude Frizon/Paris, London.' And I said Donna Karan New York, how perfect. I didn't want it to be about me, the person. I needed an anchor and that's how New York happened."

New York continues to be a major inspiration, but she admitted she doesn't necessarily call it a home.

"The level of New York is work, work, work, work, work, so to me, I don't feel that I live in New York. I feel that I work in New York," she said. "I like to live outside of New York. I just think the calm in the chaos is the thing that I always look for."

She even admitted she once contemplated moving to Italy, but didn't simply because she didn't speak the language and had little motivation to learn it.

"There's a reason why I don't speak the language," Karan quipped. "I don't want to understand what they're saying about me. So when they're sitting there talking at a fabric meeting and they're yelling at me...it doesn't bother me. I don't understand what they're saying. I'd like to keep it that way. Let everybody else understand what they're talking about."

Karan conceded that it can be challenging to be a designer in New York today because the business continues to be dictated by Italy and France. Fashion itself, she said, has become globalized, a fact she still finds herself struggling with at times. "Sometimes, I have a problem walking in Turkey and seeing a DKNY store," she said, indicating that the global nature of the business has impacted the individual nature of many places.

During the conversation, the school officially unveiled the Donna Karan Professorship in Fashion Design. Karan made a contribution to the school, the value of which was not disclosed, and her gift serves as the foundation of a new Master of Fine Arts program in fashion design and society at Parsons.

When Goldberger asked her about her best idea and what she will be most remembered for, Karan didn't hesitate. "The seven easy pieces," she said. "It's also understanding the physical nature of the body and telling women that they can show the shoulder. It never gains weight, never has a wrinkle, and doesn't need Botox."

from www.wwd.com :flower:
 
"I just came back from Israel. I had an amazing, amazing experience in the school in Israel," she said. "And I got so turned on. People were actually structuring lasts of shoes. We do not have the craft here in the States right now. We're all flying to Italy. We're flying to Mexico. I really do believe that outsourcing is brilliant, but where are the craftsmen here? Where are the hands? Where is the sculpture? And that's what I would love to put back into the school."

Too true, craft and know-how is the basis of the industry and can't be replaced... But this isn't a problem restricted to the fashion world, it's happening in all sorts of businesses. Services and production in all kinds of fields is moving further and further away from crafts and cultural anchorage.
 
^ agreed, its all about craftmanship
(western culture is slowly looosing 'it' while outsourcing to 'cheaper' markets)
 
donna karan was one of my heroes from back in her anne klein days...
she's a revolutionary iin her own right...
 
^ Yep, and Donna Karan is also one of the (few) US designers who really has made an impact on both sides of the pond.
 
Her comment on craftsmanship was both valid and controversial, it's been on everyone's lips on Parsons simply because there's a growing divide of students who feel Parsons's emphasis on design is appropriate but not at the sake of true craftsmanship. Too much time is lost on the foundation year and on classes that push historicism. I think too many students feel they can leave the handiwork to the sample rooms. She's throwing a lot of light on the argument and I feel that the graduate program, if really under her influence will undoubtedly be much more balenced.
 
i love that fact that Karan comes out as this really down-to-earth person despite she is a big desinger and higly respected. i have always liked her desings and now i'm loving her even more after reading the article. she's a wise person :D
 
birdofparadise said:
Her comment on craftsmanship was both valid and controversial, it's been on everyone's lips on Parsons simply because there's a growing divide of students who feel Parsons's emphasis on design is appropriate but not at the sake of true craftsmanship. Too much time is lost on the foundation year and on classes that push historicism. I think too many students feel they can leave the handiwork to the sample rooms. She's throwing a lot of light on the argument and I feel that the graduate program, if really under her influence will undoubtedly be much more balenced.

The problem is really one of the industry, and how it addresses the culture we all live in.

Mass market (and globalization) is price focused. Style and design are secondary.

Fashion is (or used to be) about aesthetics and individual idenitity.

But increasingly, through marketing and the media culture, it's about the idenitity that can be impressed on the consumer in the process of selling and marketing.

And this is where industry (all industries, by the way) are losing the craft, the art, the wonderful aesthetics of the true artists and craftsmen, to the crass economics of the generic mass market.

As such, Parsons (and all schools) have to prepare students for the real jobs they industry has to offer. And unless there is a cultural resurgance, a new renaissance so to speak, the craft is going to continue to decay, with the increasing gap between the lords (who wear designer) and the peasants (who can't).

Interesting to me, is that where the masses could easily do better... simply by developing their own taste, style and aesthetics... they don't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JohnPaulMiller said:
But increasingly, through marketing and the media culture, it's about the idenitity that can be impressed on the consumer in the process of selling and marketing.

And this is where industry (all industries, by the way) are losing the craft, the art, the wonderful aesthetics of the true artists and craftsmen, to the crass economics of the generic mass market.

excellent points posted JohnPaul and unfortunately you are right, its all in sourcing and marketing..design is really secondary the way things go
 
Very nice post, Lena
I agree--there should be a revolution!:flower:

It's happening already with food, isn't it? Organic/biological food are still priced higher than mass market food, but there are still many people who will buy it because there is a new importance placed on health, environment and quality. There are people who only want to buy this kind of product. So, maybe the same will happen for the crafts. In the near future! or even now, in some places

Also: I hear the fashion academy in Antwerp very focused on craft?
 
By the way, it says Donna Karan didn't finish school before she started her label. Did she learn it through Anne Klein?

Are there specific methods a person has to learn before he can sell clothing in the market (at boutiques, department stores, etc.)? Can a person do it without knowing these?
I've heard of people selling clothes they made through Ebay or their personal websites, and they finished their clothing with only a french seam or zigzag stitch for the seam--they didn't use any sergers, which is the work done I see for clothing sold at regular shops. Will the market accept clothes like these? I can't say the quality is worse. It seems the same...?

(sorry if this is getting off-topic)
 
Schools still need to be balenced, I feel. Parsons is not the industry, it is a school tied to a pretty radical university in its own right and I believe it should make and perserve its loyalties with academia, not with whichever way the industry decides to kneel. Thus far, the graduate program seems as if it will have a social slant and incorporate international concerns over its two year curriculum...
 
gius, i'm sad to say so, but evn though i've studied hard, i learned the hard way..
when we go down to 'real business' work experience is so much more useful than academics

the Academy in Antwerp, yes, very based on crft and experimenting but somehow they've been slightly 'losing it' lately.
fashion is an ever changing environment, what could be perfect can lose its 'magic' pretty quick, due to socio-economic-political reasons it seems that we are entering an essentially new fashion industry era..
 
gius said:
I've heard of people selling clothes they made through Ebay or their personal websites, and they finished their clothing with only a french seam or zigzag stitch for the seam--they didn't use any sergers, which is the work done I see for clothing sold at regular shops. Will the market accept clothes like these? I can't say the quality is worse. It seems the same...?

Those garments "merely" finished with french seams and bound seams are actually a better quality, more expensive finish, because they are made by hand and require more labor.

Sergers (traditionally the Merrow finish) are actually used because they are cheap, fast, and easy. While a factory (heavy duty, single purpose) serger may run a $1500, a basic serger capable of finishing seams can be picked up dirt cheap (well under $400 at WalMart).

So when you see those french seams, try to remember that you are seeing a labor intensive product.
 
very interesting article and discussion. thanks lena for the article and jpm for your input. very valuable! :smile:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,462
Messages
15,185,971
Members
86,337
Latest member
mamaligafw
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->