Fashion (as we know it) is Obsolete

Poll removed ... not applicable to this topic


  • Total voters
    10
^ But don't you think there is a pretty big 'maker' movement in the US right now? Small craft businesses (like letterpress) are huge in the Bay Area. Probably the majority of sellers on Etsy are makers. I can (and have) get on Etsy and have someone make me a rug, a calendar, curtains, a felted animal, or something to wear. I can't open virtually any magazine without reading about someone who's left the corporate world (yay!) to start a business making something, whether it's wallpaper or cakes. And all the things for sale don't take into account people with craft hobbies like mine who don't sell their work.
 
Oh gosh— I don’t see you as the Etsy-type, fashionista… First Harry Potter knowledge, and now this…

That type of arts-and-crafts community has always been around, and they’ve always strived steadily far from the exploits of high fashion so good for them. Frankly, I’m just not very interested in that type of craft— I suppose it comes down to personal taste, and I prefer my artisanal pieces very high fashion. So, even if a high fashiondesigner has more of an arts-and-crafts attitude, they will inevitably always connect with the high fashion world.

^^I understand what you mean about Social Media presenting its own challenges…it still is a new frontier. But, I suppose what I meant is that when starting out, a small, young designer/company needs to prioritize their budget to be largely development and product based. Social Media does offer exposure that IS free and DOES work. I have several friends that are designers and artists back in NY and they have started to receive quite a bit of exciting press because they have cultivated a unique product and have been able to present their work and themselves in a sophisticated way on Instagram. They are contacted all the time by stylists, photographers, models, journalists, etc. through the platform. This was, until recently, impossible to do without an expensive PR team.

I've seen too many designers come through my factory and penny-pinch at every step of the patterning, fitting and sampling process. In my eyes, this exactly where the majority of the focus and resources need to be spent. I think after reading Li and Jean-Jacques' assessment of fashion now and fashion-future, it's definitely true that the era of the egomaniacal designer is over. Now is the time for designers to focus, be considered, be reflective, challenge themselves, and work really hard. It's all about the product. It's the only way that we can break into a new era. Once we've discovered new ways for fashion to operate, I think we'll emerge into a new era of play and creativity and really exciting fashion. But right now, it just doesn't seem like designers are having much fun…there's simply too much work to be done. Or when something is "fun," it's so forced or it's super cynical in nature (Vetements, for example, is pretty cynical fun, IMO).

I also like what both Li and Jean-Jacques talked about entering into an era of collaboration…which is also a sign-post of the end of the egocentric designer. We are craving human connection because most of us live our lives digitally. We crave physicality - working together, making things with our hands, tactile stuff.

Society - in particular American society - needs to collectively find value and pride, again, in being a tradesperson, an artisan, an expert. We're dangerously on the brink of grooming every last citizen to know only how to spend their talents, energies and potential in front of a computer screen. We HAVE to learn to make things again. Our economy needs it, and we need it personally as a matter of rewarding self-fulfillment.

dior, sitting in front of the computer is 90% of my livelihood LOL

I know what you mean. The lines between the artisanal and intimacy and conglomerate commercialism has widened so much in high fashion that I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to call it segregation.

This all leads me back to the S/S 2016 Comme collection that was all extremities and no commercial designs presented for the show. It was fantastic of course, but a fair amount of more traditional Comme jackets and suits mixed with the opulent showpieces would have taken it to that next level for me. You know, back when McQueen, Gaultier and Galliano ruled the runways, and as hyper-stylized as their vision for their shows always were, there were always impeccably-cut suits and more classical pieces styled along with the showpieces. I know this isn’t the 90s, or even the early-2000s anymore, but that sense of thoughtfulness carefully mingling with the sense of wildness is what I am attracted to high fashion the most.

I suppose it’s too much to ask of younger designers, publications and creative individuals to learn and contribute as much as they can to their offerings these days. The “good enough” attitude seems to be so widely prevalent now. I think the presentation of high fashion is as important as the actual offerings. Friends of mine opened Fashion Week here some time ago and although their pieces are actually extremely well-constructed— very old-world craftsmanship (although the designs aren’t to my taste— neither are their styling…), the PR agency that represented them signed off on the most miserably, cheap collateral: Outdated invitation design that looked like it was rushed together on Windows ’95, and a program that was printed on standard office paper and likely “designed” in Word. Beyond cheap and thoughtless. And this was executed by the supposedly best PR fashion team in the city… Then you have the Katen brothers’ DSquared2, which is generally poo-pooed on around here generally. I’m not a fan of their branding and fashion direction, but once in the shops, their more classic suitings, jackets and even denim and footwear pieces are really impressive for their quality and construction, and for that, I own and will continue to buy them. So in that sense, I’m with you: Premium quality and construction with design will always trump branding.

New designers, photographers, art directors and all creative types along with those in administrative positions, need to band together and contribute in building their careers, a community and learn from one another more than ever before. With these giant conglomerates that have their scouts out for new blood and immediately snatch up the latest hypes, there really is lesser and lesser of an opportunity for the emergence of a new, fresh and genuinely exciting direction in high fashion. How can fresh ideas ever be nurtured and evolve when the components are scattered and divided? Even amongst these groups (from my experience), there is this shadiness and the eagerness to abandon ship when the slightest of monetary opportunities are presented. I feel there are all these forces working against those with genuine passion and talent and vision— sadly, it may just be too much to deal with and those talents just give up altogether.
 
I am full of surprises :mrgreen: This very moment I just finished ordering a handmade 2016 calendar on Etsy, as I did last year. You seem to be thinking of it as all one style, but it's really not just one thing at all ... and much of it is very well designed. I'm not the only fan around tFS ...


I think what's happening now is different. There's a huge difference in available infrastructure now vs. 20 or even 10 years ago. Before, you'd either have to go to craft shows or print your own catalogs or sell wholesale to a brick & mortar outlet in order to get your goods in front of customers. Now the marketplace is already there waiting, you just have to plug in, post some pix and prices and you're good to go ...


imogene + willie is really the only brand that comes to my mind that is well known both in the maker and the fashion communities.
 
Can I brag a little, I have the same experience as her--only I didn't end up in fashion :Pink:
 
Burberry’s Bold Move: To Make Shows Direct to Consumer
LONDON — As the industry debates the future of seasonal fashion, buy-now-wear-now collections and direct-to-consumer shows, Burberry is short-circuiting the conversation and radically changing the way it does business.

Come September, the $7.54 billion company plans to show seasonless men’s and women’s wear collections together, on the runway, twice a year. In addition, it will make all the collections immediately available online and in-store. Window displays in its stores and media campaigns will change the moment the curtain comes down on the catwalk.

Burberry’s shift could be the snowflake that begins an avalanche of change as designers, retailers and fashion organizations debate the overheated fashion system; the future of shows; social media; the growing move to mobile and e-commerce shopping from brick-and-mortar, and how to energize a consumer who seems gripped with ennui when it comes to fashion.

“We have designers, retailers and everybody complaining about the shows. Something’s not right anymore because of social media, people are confused,” Diane von Furstenberg, chairman of the Council of Fashion Designers of America, told WWD in December. “We have some ideas. Everyone seems to feel that the shows being consumer-driven is a very good idea.”

The CFDA is awaiting an analysis from Boston Consulting Group on the viability and logistics of consumer-oriented fashion weeks. Over the past few months, a host of designers – including Tom Ford, Giles Deacon, Matthew Williamson, Misha Nonoo, Thakoon Panichgul and Rebecca Minkoff — have decided to put the focus on the social media savvy end-consumer who refuses to wait six months for her clothes to land in store.

The British Fashion Council, meanwhile, is ramping up its program of consumer-facing shows known as London Fashion Weekend.

Burberry is by far the biggest name to take the leap, and its decision could accelerate proposed changes to runway show and delivery patterns.

Christopher Bailey, the company’s chief creative and chief executive officer, said the move is all about the end consumer. “The changes we are making will allow us to build a closer connection between the experience that we create with our runway shows and the moment when people can physically explore the collections for themselves,” he said.

“Our shows have been evolving to close this gap for some time. From live-streams, to ordering straight from the runway, to live social media campaigns, this is the latest step in a creative process that will continue to evolve,” he added, referring to the myriad digital initiatives that Burberry has been spearheading over the years.

In an interview with WWD, Bailey said the decision had been evolving naturally. “We began live-streaming in 2008-09 and ever since then we’ve been talking directly to a customer about the collections, about the mood, about the music, about the fashion and about the event. But then we’ve also been saying to the customer, ‘You have to fit into the traditional sector thing,’ and it just didn’t feel right and it hasn’t felt right since the beginning.

“I told the teams that we can’t expect a customer to understand our timings because, I mean, it’s silly, which is why we did runway made-to-order collections. You can’t talk to a customer and say, ‘We’re really excited, we’re going to stimulate you and inspire you, but you can’t touch it or feel it for another six months.’ In fashion we talk about ‘a moment,’ and what feels right for the moment. And I’ve always battled with that because the moment is when you’re showing it, but then you’ve got to kind of say is it the right moment five or six months down the line? I just struggled with it. So it’s just trying to say to the customers: ‘You’re really important to us. We’re serving you and we need to change our ways rather than expect you to do these things.’”

Bailey also addressed the global nature of Burberry and how his teams have to design for every season: “We’re a global company. When we stream that show, we’re not just streaming it to people who live in spring/summer climates; we’re doing it for all different climates. So I guess we’re trying to look both creatively and pragmatically at this.”

Burberry, like other big fashion and luxury brands, is also searching for ways to counteract slowing sales growth. Add to that consistently deteriorating sales in the high-margin markets of Hong Kong and Macau and the repeated devaluation of the once mighty yuan as China seeks to boost exports and prod economic growth.

In January, Burberry admitted in a third-quarter trading statement that its results fell short of internal expectations, with revenues flat at reported rates and up one percent underlying.

Sales in the October-to-December period were 603 million pounds, or $917 million, in what Bailey called “a tougher environment than expected” for the sector as a whole.

Burberry said its latest move will “significantly shorten the traditional gap between the runway show and retail availability.”

Asked about the logistics of switching to a buy-now-wear-now business and about the impact the move will have on wholesale and retail partners, Bailey said the process will take time.

“We do not have the answers to everything today. It is certainly new behavior for us, and it will mean that we want to build stronger collaborative partnerships with our wholesale partners because it absolutely is a different way of working. We will be doing things where we invite those partners to see the collection, and that will have to be embargoed. It will just mean a different way of working. But what I love about it is our partners can work with it, they can see it, we can create special packages for them, we can then start saying ‘OK, do we do a special event for your customers where they watch the show live, and then they can shop immediately.’ So then it starts to open up actually a whole new, really exciting world.”

He added that Burberry’s twice-yearly pre-collections will be integrated into the runway event. “Pre will become part of the show, and it will also become part of an earlier delivery. We’re just thinking more about what will we have in the store in September, what will we have in the store in October. It will be more of a capsule, creative capsule approach than just two collections per season,” he said.

Burberry’s decision comes on the heels of another strategic shift: In November, the company revealed plans to fold its various collections under the single Burberry label. The change was aimed at presenting a cohesive brand experience to the end customer and offering them a simpler way to shop.

Although the company will no longer stage men’s wear runway shows, Burberry said it plans to work with London Collections: Men to create “new ways of playing a significant part in these key moments in the men’s fashion calendar.”

While Burberry may be the biggest and most influential label to herald a new era in showing and selling, it’s certainly not the first to do so — and it won’t be the last. The question now is how thick and fast the changes will come.

Indeed, the British Fashion Council welcomed Burberry’s decision, and also hinted that more change is afoot: ‘The BFC executive board has been talking for some time about fashion shows better connecting to consumers and being a direct driver for retail sales. Burberry is a truly innovative brand and this strategic move shows brilliant leadership from Christopher Bailey and his team in driving this agenda forward. A number of British brands will move to a similar model over the next few seasons,” said British Fashion Council ceo Caroline Rush.

Retailers are embracing the move to more in-season, consumer-focused fashion — and agitating for more change.

“Customers don’t see fashion through the lens of fall or spring, and the whole idea of a season is becoming antiquated,” said Ken Downing, senior vice president and fashion director at Neiman Marcus, told WWD, adding there is a major problem nowadays with customer fatigue.

“You cannot hold a customer’s attention for six months. They are following every move in fashion, which means that by the time a collection arrives in store they are over it. Technology has changed everything. Customers are living in the here and the now, but we as an industry are working with a business model that is 40-50 years old,” he said.

To wit, some of London’s retailers are increasingly tailoring their offer to the different seasons.

“Increasingly, our customers are looking for ‘buy-now-wear-now’ items and we have to respond to that,” said Jason Broderick, Harrods’ director of men’s wear, sports and fine watches.

Scott Tepper, fashion buying and merchandising director at Liberty, said the store has been seeing “a very distinct change in our customers’ shopping patterns” and therefore decided to take some calculated risks for the early spring buys to reflect them.

“It’s no longer viable to offer the customer nothing but lightweight fabrications in December, January and February. We’ve learned there is a substantial customer block that wants newness in everything from overcoats to chunky knits to cold-weather accessories when the weather warrants them — and not before — but he’s bored by carryover fall styles,” Tepper said.

Liberty expects the strategy to lift early fall sales by as much as 30 percent, he said, and has raised its open-to-buy accordingly for brands that have adjusted to the “new reality” of the seasonal shift.

Last month, during London Collections: Men, Selfridges unveiled a special Canada Goose pop-up collection on its men’s wear floor at a time when shoppers can actually use a winter coat rather than, say, a spring wool suit. The pop-up ran until the end of January.

As reported last month, one of the big reasons Giles Deacon decided to leave the London ready-to-wear catwalk behind and show his couture collection in Paris was to accommodate his end-consumer.

He told WWD last month: “With couture, it means I get to show fall in July, with delivery in September. My clients will be getting their pieces in season.”

He also plans to interface with customers more on screen between the seasonal catwalk collections. “Today, it’s all about going to the customer, rather than waiting for footfall in a shop.”

Other London names including Marios Schwab and Matthew Williamson have quit the schedule altogether, opting to work in a different way, with one-on-one showroom appointments and in-season deliveries.

Tom Ford revealed late last year that he plans to show both his fall 2016 women’s wear and men’s wear collections in “small, intimate presentations” in New York, during New York Fashion Week, on Feb. 18.

“Right now, I think that a certain fluidity is necessary in regards to how we communicate with the consumer, and I have experimented with different formats recently. The most important thing to me with a presentation is that it communicates the message of the season and the point of view of the collection,” he said.

Meanwhile, London men’s wear brand Ada + Nik went “trans-seasonal” during its sales campaign at Paris Fashion Week in January.

“On our Web site, we noticed people were buying puffer jackets in the middle of summer and tank tops in the middle of winter,” said Nik Thakkar, a creative consultant and brand strategist who designs the line with couturier Ada Zanditon. “Seasons just don’t work any more and we experienced that first hand.”

Later this month the BFC plans to expand its longstanding consumer-facing showcase, which will take place on Feb. 25, two days after the end of London Fashion Week. London Fashion Weekend will be held at the Saatchi Gallery near Sloane Square, and will feature Emilia Wickstead, Holly Fulton, Mary Katrantzou and Temperley London.

The BFC plans to showcase one designer a day, with the runway show repeated about two to four times throughout the day. The audience reach is likely to exceed 16,000. The designers also sell directly to consumers during the event.

“There is no doubt in future seasons these lines will blur even more as designers opt to do in-season shows. However, we need to ensure those businesses that rely on platforms such as fashion weeks to reach new wholesale partners and media continue to have the opportunity to do so,” Rush said.

The biannual, four-day consumer event, held at the Saatchi Gallery, will host runway shows, designer talks, shopping galleries and trends presentations. The shopping area will see 150 brands on sale, including Fyodor Golan, J. JS Lee, Linda Farrow, Mawi, Paper London, Pringle of Scotland and Osman.
wwd
 
it's really more of a haute couture schedule then. for those who can afford it.

personally, i love the ridiculousness of the shows being half a year before stuff hits salesfloors and then celebs wearing next next season's clothes on the red carpet. as a stylist, i'm being offered pre-fall now and come April, we're all getting ready to shoot winter wools in the middle of summer.

magazines simply need a longer time to research articles and prepare shoots. yes, print is becoming less and less important, but it's still here and i think we all agree that print will be here to stay, at least for a while longer. Valentine's might be now, but the editorial staff has been working on articles and spreads since before Christmas, right after Halloween was over. PRs have been working press releases for Valentines since before that.

things simply need time.
 
There are BIG problems that come with such changes.

If they make the clothes immediatelly, they wont make em as per ordered, that means there will be shortages of some pieces and some in excess (isnt that the reason they do it months in advance, so they know how many should be made as per buyers demands and not make a lot of clothes which wont be sold?).

And do you think these "leftovers" are going to end up in a clearance bin in some department store? NO! This may take a heavy toll on the environment.

Though I understand this changes come because of the new consumers needs. Its a conundrum
 
Tommy Hilfiger Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Shows
BoF can exclusively reveal that starting in September 2016, Tommy Hilfiger will stage 'multimedia broadcast' fashion shows targeting consumers, with full collections instantly available for sale via retail, e-commerce and wholesale channels.
businessoffashion
 
There are BIG problems that come with such changes.

If they make the clothes immediatelly, they wont make em as per ordered, that means there will be shortages of some pieces and some in excess (isnt that the reason they do it months in advance, so they know how many should be made as per buyers demands and not make a lot of clothes which wont be sold?).

And do you think these "leftovers" are going to end up in a clearance bin in some department store? NO! This may take a heavy toll on the environment.

Though I understand this changes come because of the new consumers needs. Its a conundrum

I guess in the case of Burberry, they have many boutiques, so their own buyers can do their thing at the appropriate time. And the show will reflect that. I think he said they were going to bring other retailers into the fold? So I guess what that would really mean is that 6 months or whatever ahead, there will be a super-secret retailers only show.

PS Yoox is where leftovers go, right? :wink:
 
^i think these brands are being a little misleading the way they are going to do it is in a similar way to how Phoebe Philo at Céline shows the pre collections, the buyers and press will see the collection before the public and try put an embargo on photos etc. so they'll know the buy etc.
brands like Burberry have the money to produce next seasons collection in the time frame, and then Vetements is showing between the menswear and couture to accommodate the time for manufacturing that way.
I'm not sure how I feel about that I'd rather see the collections before buyers, editors etc get the chance to dictate any changes to collections.
 
^ You make a good point ... this would be the commercialized version. In the case of Burberry, you don't need to worry perhaps about the loss of the artistic statement :wink: And Dries produces everything as shown. If everyone starts to move toward this model, then we can start to worry ...
 
I'm glad to see change finally happening in fashion, Burberry might be a big British bore but it has the money and the influence to actually make people notice and to cause a ripple of awareness.

Like Bailey said, it's a very experimental stage and I have very mixed feelings.. It's an exciting change and for my left brain it makes a great deal of sense, but I feel a little bit sick at how immediate fashion has become. "I want what she has - Thanks."

I'm wondering if Burberry is hoping for a windfall of excited impulse purchases after the show, it's certain to happen after the first show 'n' buy.
(I don't know why I'm imagining the sort of scene at the opening of an H&M collaboration... only all of the shoppers are in Louboutins)

Certainly that would be all of the excitement the collection will get, it will be immediate, in the same day; the show, the clothes, the campaign.. all of the excitement is gone in a day instead of extended over the traditional period.
 
The benefit is indeed the impulse buyers but maybe they can continue the excitement after the show by the eds/ads. Showing different styling options etc.
There is also the possibility that there are going to be more super secret collections (still 6 months in advance) or collections only seen in store. Celine for example sells items you can't find anywhere else.
 
They stream the show in the stores, so I imagine they will just keep it going for awhile.
 
Michael Kors to Include Buy-Now Capsule on Runway
Ready-to-Wear. Ready to Go.

That’s Michael Kors’ handle for the buy-now runway phenomenon that’s infiltrating the fall season. And he’s in. The collection he will show on Wednesday will include an eight-piece capsule of rtw, shoes and handbags that will be available immediately on the brand’s Web site and at its Madison Avenue Michael Kors Collection store. An in-store event will highlight the capsule that day.

“My attitude is, she doesn’t pay attention to seasons anyway, so why not grab and go?” Kors said. He noted that knitwear makes a great deal of sense for his first foray into the arena. He’s showing a gray cashmere sweater and matching short skirt decorated with cabochon studs for a look he “rock ‘n’ roll Park Avenue moment.”

There are also a studded camera bag and mary janes with the hardware covering the toe and heel. “People think mary janes — she’s so demure,” Kors said. “She’s not demure in these. She’s kind of like Chessy Rayner meets Courtney Love.” He will offer two additional bag and shoe styles as well.
wwd
 
Gucci to Unify Men’s and Women’s Shows
MILAN — Gucci is shaking up the fashion calendar — by going co-ed.

The Italian brand plans to present its men’s and women’s collections in one fashion show starting in 2017.

The first unified show is to take place at Gucci’s sprawling new Milan headquarters in Via Mecenate next year.

“It seems only natural to me to present my men’s and women’s collections together. It’s the way I see the world today,” said creative director Alessandro Michele. “It will not necessarily be an easy path and will certainly present some challenges, but I believe it will give me the chance to move towards a different kind of approach to my story telling.”

“Moving to one show each season will significantly help to simplify many aspects of our business,” said Marco Bizzarri, president and chief executive officer of Gucci. “Maintaining two separate, disconnected calendars has been a result of tradition rather than practicality.”

The executive revealed the development on Tuesday morning at the New York Times International Luxury Conference.

Gucci is also working with the Camera Nazionale della Moda to determine a calendar date that will support the company’s commitment to a “see now, buy later” schedule.
wwd
 
^^that's a good idea for gucci...

of course, most houses have two separate designers for mens and womens, so it's not something that everyone can do...

also- there are usually separate buyers and editors, so i don't know how they will manage to invite everyone in the same sized space...
this will be interesting...
 
Especially since he is basically doing womenswear for the men from what little I've seen :wink:

I guess they'll be creating the space in the new HQ with this in mind ...
 
haha...

i think it's possible that really high end luxury fashion is going to go the way of couture...
it may just slowly die out...

i feel like it's been dying for so long, it's hard for me to care anymore...
:ermm:...

i wish someone would just shoot it and put it out of its misery already...
:ninja:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
retail as we know it is forever altered...

here is a concise round up of all the things we have discussed here over the years...
climate change, ethical spending vs. disposable wardrobes, the internet, branding, etc...

why americans aren't shopping-
excerpt from BOF

The whys of these circumstances are wide ranging, and have broader implications than a few months of weak sales. They suggest that retail as we know it is forever altered.

“When oil prices, unemployment, and gas prices are low — and interest rates aren’t necessarily high — generally people want to go shopping,” says retail and fashion consultant Robert Burke. “I think that there are some factors that did not exist to the degree that they do today that have changed the patterns and the way in which people shop.”

One such factor is the increasingly unpredictable weather. The majority of the US experienced an unseasonably warm winter and an unseasonably cool spring, meaning many retailers have already begun marking down their warm-weather product long before the peak of swimsuit season. While some nimble retailers can adjust inventory to an extent to better serve the conditions outside, most are wedded to the merchandise they ordered six months ago.

Another component is the presidential race. While retail is traditionally soft in an election year, the presence of a polarising candidate like Donald Trump has intensified the effect. “I’m in the malls three-to-four times a week, and all we hear about is the uncertainty around the election,” says Gabriella Santaniello, retail analyst at A Line Partners. “Sales associates are talking about it in the stores, and that’s unprecedented. I do think that it’s touching consumers at all socioeconomic levels.”

What’s more, consumers are still recovering — if not financially, but emotionally — from the Great Recession, which wiped out many retirement accounts and sent millions of homeowners into foreclosure. “A lot of people have post-traumatic stress disorder when it comes to spending,” says Todd Knoop, an economist at Cornell College. “The economy has evolved more quickly than people’s [thoughts] on how the economy is doing.”

But the recession also trained consumers to think differently about pricing. Thanks to season-end fire sales, near-continual markdowns and an increase in off-price retail channels, consumers expect virtually everything to eventually go on sale. “The increase in promotions has had a ripple effect,” Burke says. “The luxury shopper used to be embarrassed to compare price or ask about price, and it’s commonplace today.”

Skittish customers equal skittish retailers, who have been more conservative in their merchandising approach since the Recession. The resilience of skinny jeans — which remain the core of many denim collections — speaks to this. “Retailers are afraid of making a statement,” Santaniello says. “We’ve been looking at relatively the same trends for the past five years.” When retailers do a adopt a new look — such as the off-the-shoulder blouse — they tend push every brand to offer their own version, creating more homogeneity within the store.

There has been a shift in values as well. A certain set of consumers — perhaps those with more expendable income — are wedded to buying fewer items of higher quality, turned off by conspicuous consumption. Many have also shifted their spending from things to experiences. “As a whole, the customer is more discerning about how she spends,” Burke says.

However, post-recession conservatism is only one part of the equation. The breakdown of the economy happened to coincide with the rise of digital commerce, which has not only allowed consumers to easily comparison shop, but also encourages them to be more brand agnostic. “All of the sudden your consideration set is much bigger when you’re searching via the web,” says Lauren Kaufman Witten, head of retail at research firm L2. “For example, if you’re searching for a Christian Louboutin shoe, three quarters of the first page of Google real estate goes to paid search.” That means a consumer will not only see those glossy red soles, but also paid advertisements for often-like-minded brands.

That increase in options has created less loyalty among consumers, who are driven more by pricing and styling and less by the mythology around a name. “When was the last time brand was important, really?” Santaniello asks. “It might have been right before the recession when aspirational luxury was on the rise.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,701
Messages
15,196,668
Members
86,683
Latest member
likan8
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->