Fashion snobbery | Page 5 | the Fashion Spot
  • Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Fashion snobbery

im not sure if i am or not...at face value, yes, i am a massive fashion snob..i'll openly reject and turn my nose up at any brand/look/peice of clothing/accessory/shoes that i don't agree with, or that i don't think suits the person.

The actual reason i do it is because i think that person can do so much better...i can see the look they are going for, i don't care at the end of the day if its designer or not...its all about the total look and the style of your outfit.

I am constantly asessing and scrutinising peoples outfit choices...not the bitchy, malicious way, but in the way that i can't help but think of how i would do their look...but better and how much potential they have!!

At the end of the day its not about owning a very expensive peice of designer whatever...its about how lovely it is to own such a lovely peice of fashion...and i want other people to realise this!!
 
I am. Not to my friends, who aren't interested in fashion, but to other people. I am a snob when it comes to materials and fabrics, mostly. The worst I know are people who consider themselves all interested in fashion yet dress head to toe in H&M. If they're simply interested in being trendy, that's fine, but then I wouldn't consider them fashionable or stylish. I just find it quite hypocritical.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's really terrible to look down on other people because they wear inexpensive clothing. Not everyone cares about fashion, and not everyone who wants to wear designer clothing can afford them. It's one thing to be a fashion snob (which... I am, most likely), and another thing to *look down* upon people for something so superficial.

I am a fashion snob. Need excellent fabrics, excellent quality, excellent design. Cannot stand knockoffs as I find them terribly tacky.
 
I think it's really terrible to look down on other people because they wear inexpensive clothing.

but isn't that part of being a fashion snob? ;)

my wardrobe is a mix and match of some high end pieces (mainly professional wardrobe) to low-end casual (i swear by ezra fitch selvage denim). first and foremost i look at the quality of the fabric, its make, how it complements what i already have...or will buy down the road :innocent:and its durability. the tag on the piece is not of interest. though i hope to eventually get to a point where all the clothing i own is untagged.

ultimately though, i can applaud anyone who has a strong sense of personal fashion - good eye for colour, complementary accessories, and PROPORTION. most guys i know wear one to 3 sizes too big of anything, and some of my most timid girl-friends have the cleanest lines and presentation - they truly let their clothing speak for themselves.
 
Bambam: In my case, I don't "look down" at people for wearing inexpensive clothing. I'm a ebay/thriftstore person myself. If anything, I look down on (fashion interested) people who wear nothing but the latest from the high-street. I don't consider that stylish - I'm far too concerned with good quality and buying things that I'll love even after two months.
 
The only time when I'm a snob about fashion is when I have to defend/justify why I would spend so and so for a designer item. I have a friend who just doesn't understand why I would pay so much for clothes and says you can same thing at target or discount stores. I tell her it's all about quality and it just feels so much better in terms of fit. But of course she wouldn't understand because she really doesn't have any "nice" things in her closet.
 
I am a fashion snob with myself if that makes sense. I don't mind what other people wear unless they are TRYING to prove themselves to me and come off as jerk by doing it. :yuk:

Such as they wear so and so (insert some trendy brand here) ... which then makes them so fashionable. I think someone could have the most expensive taste (or trendy taste?) and completely wear those clothes wrong. Which I don't think that makes them fashionable.

I work at a store which clothing I rarely find something I would wear myself but would work for others and those people have their own taste in fashion and think they rock it. Which they probably do! But, it's not for me. I wear what I know works for my body and what I consider to be fashionable on me and makes me look and feel good. And I think I am snobby with that. Such as in I know what I rock really well. And I know my taste is super for me and not trying to be something I am not. And if I see someone that is trying too hard to be fashionable it hurts a little bit. I don't want to see clothes being abused like that. ;)

Anyway! I don't even know if this ramble makes sense anymore. :lol:
 
I hate people who don't take care of their shoes. Does this count?
 
I think it's really terrible to look down on other people because they wear inexpensive clothing. Not everyone cares about fashion, and not everyone who wants to wear designer clothing can afford them. It's one thing to be a fashion snob (which... I am, most likely), and another thing to *look down* upon people for something so superficial.

I agree. It's one thing to roll your eyes at those who claim to know fashion and don't dress fashionably, but it's a completely different thing to look down on someone who cannot afford designer clothing. To me, that is the same thing as looking down on poor people who cannot change their situation.
 
I hate people who don't take care of their shoes. Does this count?

;) yes. i'm the same way. if you can afford a nice pair of shoes, make sure they're clean, polished and well-kept, not like you bought them from payless and ran a marathon in a swamp yesterday... i check out the shoes of both the women and men that i work with, and of clients. if they can't pay attention to that detail, then poor hygiene, shoddy time management and ignorance are sure to follow :innocent: i can rationalize looking down at them when it's a professional atmosphere...
 
I've turned into a fashion snob ever since buying Mulberry bags. I now think why spend money on a cheap looking bag that will get damaged by wear when you can spend more on a luxury item that will stay fabulous for a longer period time where you will get more wear and enjoyment? That's my philosophy anyway. :)
 
I don't judge people by their clothing -I think that's ridiculous. I have an interest in fashion, but I see it as that, an interest, the same as an interest in art, or a particular taste in music. I would never judge anyone because they didn't share my interest in Austrian art, just as I hope nobody judges me for not having a particularly refined or sophisticated taste in music or wine, or indeed any knowledge of sport.

A lot of my friends don't know the first thing about fashion, only own enough clothing to get them through the week if they rewear it all twice, wear falling-apart trainers and threadbare jumpers when we go out to eat and I couldn't give a damn. They have other interests which make them interesting people. I understand people who say that they respect the style of someone who's dressed well more than someone who's wearing a pink juicy tracksuit and uggs -that's fair enough -but to translate this into respect for a person I think is appalling. However much I love clothes, I realise this isn't necessary to be a passable human being and some of the opinions on this thread make me feel like people equate carrying a real handbag with being a decent person. It's just a material possession; you don't need any personal qualities other than money to buy a chanel bag.


Given all that, there's a different kind of snobbery within fashion -that is, saying that there is a certain taste level which is just better. When I used to lurk on this board I thought there was a certain orthodoxy to the opinions people express - anything yohi or dries is amaazing, anything too mainstream is bleugh. Having spent more time here I think I've changed my mind in that I think people are very willing to appreciate all different tastes and styles -and price points. Certainly more than TPF which is less about fashion and more about out-spending each other, to my view. Still, it can be somewhat alienating, trying to find a way into a fashion-lover's world when you don't have access to high-end pieces or to a vast plethora of cheap vintage shops, as most people don't.

Another thing I don't like is the insinuation that you can't get 'quality' without going designer. This is absolutely not true. I have tried on designer clothes that are horrible quality (someone mentioned the patterns not matching on a printed dolce dress -I have an £11 dress from ASDA which managed to keep the pattern continuous, and although I love vivienne westwood so many of her clothes have poor stitching on the buttons and aren't lined properly -I've seen unlined coats!), I have lots of cheaper clothing which is fabulous quality. I have a Custo Barcelona dress, for example, which although it comes from a company that seems somewhat 'tacky' in its presentation and isn't super high end, is one of the best constructed pieces I've ever had. My mother took it in for me and was absolutely stunned at the workmanship -all the patterns matched at the (many) seams, everything was double-lined and just impeccable inside.

As for handbags, again, price isn't an indicator of quality. My mother is incredibly rough on handbags, broke a LV in under six months and bought herself this heavy duty leather thing from a souk in Marrakesh. Three years later that's still going strong. It might be true that if you pay £500 for a handbag you get something which you treasure for longer, and which you consider to be a more 'special' piece, but to suggest that people who buy cheaper bags are toting around badly stitched together, shoddy quality pieces of rubbish is just wrong. There is not £400 worth of difference in the quality between a topshop leather bag and a Mulberry, believe me.

My point is, it's so important to remember that fashion is about things. Sometimes they're beautiful, sometimes they're personal, sometimes they're wearable art. But it's just collecting objects, like collecting pebbles or pokemon cards. You can't really judge other people as inferior because they'd rather collect something else. And just because something means a lot to you, doesn't mean that you have acheived some kind of superior level to those who have a slightly cheaper, more common pebble.
 
And just because something means a lot to you, doesn't mean that you have acheived some kind of superior level to those who have a slightly cheaper, more common pebble.
True. But then again I need something to separate me from everyone else. :lol:

jk but I think people need to learn to except that there are different sides of fashion. Yeah CDG is great but it's not wearable for most people. I think you brought up a great point that price doesn't equal quality. I agree with that wholeheartedly. But I also find that if I buy a piece from say, Dior Homme, I'm not only buying the piece but the name and everything that is associated with the name. Am I a label wh*re? To an extent, I will admit. But my point is that owning a designer item is almost like owning a Rembrandt. It's not only the painting but the "painter" that I bought.

I also think fashionistas should learn to appreciate F21, Zara, Wet Seal, Nine West, etc. Sure, they aren't the best quality and they aren't innovative. But they aren't trying to be. They are watching big label designers seeing whats going to be the next big thing and trying to reinterpret it for the average person. Now, does the average person look at a Zara piece and think "Chloe look-a-like!?" No. But I think that if we, as in the people who know and understand fashion, learned to help educate those, and not in a pretentious way either... i mean in an actual helpful way, they would find what works best for them - personal style wise and look-wise.

My main concern with fashion snobbists is not that they are snobs but that they not be looking outside of their own box. They should be asking why someone bought the piece that they did instead of looking down on them
 
fashion_boi_01;4256074 [B said:
silk: [/B]
I don't know if I would even associate A&F with the preppy image; with their frayed denim, vintage looking tees, and wrinkled shirts, it's not nearly as clean cut as RL Polo - which I would hold to be the ideal "prep" brand.
A&F is more of a watered down quasi-surfer/prep style.

Yeah I definitely agree.
 
i agree that it is horrible to look down on people for wearing inexpensive clothes. personally, although i love fashion, I dont have alot of money to spend spend on clothing. i can only shop twice a year and lets just say that places like zara are expensive 'splurges' for me. however, that doesnt mean that there is anything wrong with me as a person or that i have bad taste just because i cant afford to buy designer (and i try to avoid obvious copies of designer too..even if its not a total knockoff i still dont like it). plus, i have friends that wear really tacky clothing and they are still lovely fun people so you shouldnt just judge people by their clothing. not everyone is interested in fashion and not everyone who is interested in fashion can afford expensive clothing and i dont think they should be looked down on for that
 
I don't think there is anything wrong with buying clothes at outlet stores like Marshalls/Loehmann's. What count's the most is the quality and originality of the item, not the price. I happen to be in luck and alway's find great!!! original and high quality Italian leather handbags in tj maxx that cost anywhere form $99-249. and I very often wear them with $500 CL shoes.I thinks it's all about the individual style, not how deep your pockets are.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,523
Messages
15,265,353
Members
88,600
Latest member
damanres
Back
Top