I had a dream about Gemma! I was lost i milan and then I met her... so cool and it felt so real. Now I want to marry her
perfect10 said:I had a dream about Gemma! I was lost i milan and then I met her... so cool and it felt so real. Now I want to marry her
mademoiselle_ said:VOGUE Aus April
(Thanks to Xavi)
<- please do not quote pictures. if you need to refer to one, do so by post number/position. Thank You ->
These are absolutely STUNNING! So glamourous...and I am in love with the colouring.acester said:her hair is so much darker...and she looks like she's from another decade..I dunno I'm too young to know what is what...it looks like an OLD cover from like...70s? 50s? 60s? or something..![]()
I think there's a faint hint of a 50s touch, though, somewhere. You're never too young to be knowledgable, you can always dig out those fashion photography history books at the library
There you can see that most designers, photograpers or models aren't being terribly innovative - but on the other hand, why reinvent the wheel?!?!Odette said:She has a round face, so what's the problem? I think it was her round face plus the long and slim siluette that makes her special. I prefer her face over sunken faces that look il,or extremelly heart-shaped or extra long ones.
I can't believe my friends don't like her because of her roundy face, they say it looks chubby.

Thats what makes her look sooo young. That face will be priceless asset as she ages!Misako said:She doesn't have a round face, it's heart/oval shaped. She has the pointy-ish chin (although it's not as bad as reese witherspoon, per se) and the general bone structure is heart/oval shaped. She has less prominant cheekbones, but they're very high. There's some baby fat in the cheeks.
The Vogue cover - she looks pretty, but the cover is bland to me...
