Givenchy F/W 12.13 Paris | Page 3 | the Fashion Spot

Givenchy F/W 12.13 Paris

What a big fat letdown.

Like it has been said - it is messy and all over the place. It has no coherence whatsoever.
It lacks the wow factor. I'm nowhere near as excited as I used to be while looking at Givenchy collections. Truth be told, I'm rather closer to yawning this time.
 
It's a definite continuation of pre-fall, what with the horrendous cankle-boots and the tailoring, and I agree that there are a number of pieces that look terribly messy - mainly due to the poor styling.
Though I think this is 100% better than spring, these are essentials that need to stay in pre-fall.
 
i was so looking forward to this all weekend! I'm so disappointed. what happened to the epic shows he did?:cry:
 
What a bad collection, truly one of the worst things Ricardo ever produced. The styling is all over the place, the fabrics are cheap, the accessories are ugly, the silhouettes are unflaterring... I can go on and on. But mainly, it lacked a direction and point of view, it seems like he just went remaking some things that he did in the past and the safe tailoring.

Givenchy needs a breath of fresh air, as much as I love Ricardos's esthetic, it's becoming too monotonous and expected.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It felt just like Ackerman and Tisci had the same idea but the first one excelled in execution and Riccardo got lost half way ...Just my opinion :)
 
Really, really not liking this at all. As others have said, the first half dozen or so looks that were posted held some promise, but it quickly became too much and, frankly, kind of ugly. Compared to last season especially, which was so clear and concise and cool and effortless, this comes off as quite clumsy and overloaded with ideas, references and details.

This is definitely not Tisci's best work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a bit off...definitely not his best...I think he's trying to experiment or push himself further, trying but half of it's very good and half of it's very bad....
 
It's not as bad as everyone's been saying (talk about melodrama), but I will admit I was really disappointed. After having delivered such amazing collections since Spring 2010, I was kind of hoping for something equally as great. But this is just kinda... okay for me.
 
Review from WWD
Pitch black and freezing cold, as a high school courtyard typically is at 8 p.m. on a Sunday night in March, the Lycée Carnot was nevertheless filled with the raw energy of anticipation for Riccardo Tisci’s fall Givenchy show. It opened with a light installation, red and white beams that chased around steel rings suspended from the ceiling to drum beats like a thoroughbred’s gallop. The horsepower pulsed down the runway through every look to the finish.

It was an excellent collection, built on strength and confidence, which — if the above wordplay and gallop soundtrack weren’t hint enough — had something to do with equestrian motifs from the Seventies, starting from the ground up. Each girl was shod in riding boots crafted from thick, refined leather from above the knee to the floor that, depending on your point of view, gave the impression of a hoof or a chic boot peaking out from boot-cut pants. It was the foundation of Tisci’s edgy proposition for iconic Seventies sex, of the Guy Bourdin variety, and androgynous glamour redefined on the designer’s terms.

Tisci’s signature acute tailoring came first with variations on riding jackets done in slick combinations of pony hair, fur and leather that were placed on precise panels. A relatively simple blazer paired with silk jodhpurs was done with a stand-up collar; finished to the nines in decadent piping, it was cut away in the back — a standard effect, whether as a straight panel or a sculpted tailcoat. More elaborate outerwear showpieces flaunted Tisci’s leather and fur workmanship, with graphic, diagonal patches of red, black and brown fur spliced on a jacket with short, angular sleeves.

The designer broke away from the sturdy hard-lined stuff with lingerielike dresses. They were soft and feminine with their lace-appliquéd, camisolelike tops and filmy pleated skirts, yet brash in their colorways, such as gold rococo embroidery on a bejeweled purple dress cinched with a bright red belt.

Broken apart, much of the collection had its origins in buttoned-up bourgeois attire — trim jackets and proper pleated skirts, scarves tied at the neck. But Tisci’s treatments — even the classics, like quilted leather — oozed chic aggression and sexuality.
 
OMG I agree with everyone. This is terrible. I'm so disappointed after the amazingness which was the last collection.

This needs a MAJOR edit. The colours aren't eye pleasing either. Those lingerielike dresses are just weird. Has he been visiting Courtney Love's archives.
 
This **** should be in 9gag...xD dear lord, ugly for the sake of being ugly.
 
just read WWD review. maybe you had to be there? i don't know. from what i see here this is not very interesting. boring collection and safe. what happened?:yuk:
 
I feel like many of the looks were inspired by cockroaches :blink::shock:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,243
Messages
15,292,525
Members
89,167
Latest member
afrobichota
Back
Top