Harper's Bazaar China March 2013 : Sarah Jessica Parker by John-Paul Pietru

[missnyc]

blog.jedroot.com

When bad photoshop happens to good people.

 

[justaguy]

Yup, too much photoshop. The edit is nice, though.

 

[chloesaab]

the editorial looks amazing in thumbnails but when enlarged it's scary, this is a photoshop disaster

 

[lelaid]

oh my... poor SJP.

 

[GlamorousBoy]

well, it is photoshopped to death and I think it is not suitable for woman in her age to wear unlined lace but the editorial is great

hope she will stop ruining her iconic face into cat face...

 

[Hector]

the huge sleeves on the cover are distracting.

 

[Nymphaea]

How much photoshop can you use!? Love the McQ pic. Always lovely to see Sarah.

 

[Deleted member 1957]

daaamn thats some freaky photoshop!!!

 

[Bertrando3]

photoshopped to death but damn she knows how to pose!!! Love the styling, hair & make-up, the set, the poses, her. It all works but why did they have to ruin it all with SO much retouching?!

 

[Abracadabra]

^ Ditto, I don't think shooting her straight forward works though, maybe if she tilted her head to the side slightly on the cover but putting the over photoshopping and bad angle aside, I think the whole thing including the editorial is rather striking. Some wonderful styling going on combined with some nice elements such as the hair & make-up.

 

[dodencebt]

Okay, I really love SJP and all the drama she gives in the editorial - very Sex and the City in Paris circa 2004, but that Photoshop is a DISASTER. She looks like Jocelyn Wildenstein