Well of course people get pregnant at that age, but it sure as hell dosen't make it right, and it could very well be the first step in the wrong direction. Britney was 24 at the birth of her first child and clearly not ready for motherhood- there is a good chance Jamie Lynn was raised the same as Britney and behaves in a similar manner. This isn't Keisha Castle Hughes we're talking about- its a Spears girl. And the last thing the Spears family needs to be doing right now is reproducing.
what? 'doesn't make it right?', that is
very individual. Getting a child at the age of 16 might not be the best move, but come on. You don't know the family, and you clearly judge her by the way her sister acts. And we don't really know anything about how Britney Spears raise her children, except the occasional Daily Mail-article. I think you and other's is giving her a too hard time.. But obviously, i'm not naive (hopefully), it's not going to be a thrill for a 16yearold girl raising a child, esp with paparazzi's and when most people already have an impression of her thanks to her sister (just look at yourself, for example). However, what i think is naive is not to expect 16yearold celebs to get pregnant. 16yearold and younger 'normal' girls get pregnant. It's not often, but it happens. I know at least 5 girls who got pregnant at 16, 17, 15, yes, even 14.
I'm not a Spears-fan at all, but. yeah. provoke. And she might not even be pregnant, i assume that would clearly be the best for her.
"whats with that orange thing she is wearing i hope that picture is from the same day, repeating an outfit is bad enough but one that is so vile! yikes!"
..you've never worn the same outfit?