Tentacl Ventricl
Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 514
- Reaction score
- 0
This collection was phenomenal! The cut of those jackets and pants was sublime, but what really made a difference here was the attention to detail on the seaming of the shoulder and the sleeves. It reminds me of when Coco Chanel said that the luxuriousness of clothes was to be seen in the detailing of the sleeves and the cuff.
Besides, this collection reminded me a lot of 2001: A Space Odyssey (Kubrick) which I love! It had that whole futuristic modernity but with the influence of the 60's. I saw a lot of Balenciaga-inspired shapes (the backs of the dresses and coats in particular).
Overall I thought this was a nice blend of his last two collections (FW 10 and SS 11) but even I can admit that some of those shapes and fabrics might be difficult for the customer to wear. I'm curious to see how they water this one down for the customer!
Excellent analysis Mr Newton. Yes silhouettes after 40's/50's Balenciaga but also a feel of 60's minimalism too. And, somehow, a little of the 90s as well perhaps from the fact that the volumes give an easy, slightly slouchy feel that, yes, is there from Raf's offering last season. Like, perhaps, Francisco Costa's work, the art of contemporary Jil Sander is in the synthesis of retro inspirations so that it feels not too like any one bygone era and thus feels modern.
But - - the risk with the restraint of minimalism is that you can turn fashion cold, frigid. How far distant a moment it now seems when Raf had the press and buyers up in arms with the Zubriski Point collection - the sheer, the short, the wet hair, the ravaged by nature organicism. Yet it was only 4 seasons ago.
There is such a thing as elegance - and we don't want everyone at the Versace/Scognamiglio end of the spectrum please god - but, in recent seasons at least, it's been to Raf's particular credit that he's managed to give minimalism a little va va voom. This collection, by contrast, passes under the radar a little, fails to engage the primordial senses, because it's all too low octane. In short, it's just not sexy. If SS10 was wet, AW 11/12 is dry.
The problem lies in going away from the body with silhouette in conjunction with traditional winter weights. AW10/11 had some zip in that particularly the tailored onesies had an element of bodycon. Still elegant and refined but sexy too. Even last season with the exagerrated volumes the summer weight meant there was a sense of the body's presence in movement, an airiness between garment and body, a caress.
My point is perhaps best illustrated by the roomiest of the floral print pieces for AW11/12. It looks like maternity wear.
Is this what women want? Maybe. Raf says he thinks his wearer likes to be challenged. And it's to Raf's credit as surely one of the foremost design talents of his generation that, like Miucca, he manages to hold the brand dna and at the same time consistently offer up a new vision each season.
But is change alone enough to excite the senses, to push those buying triggers? And where, in the progression he's taken since SS10, does he go next? I'd like to see him bringing sexy back and head again in the direction of Zubriski Point.