Kate Moss - posting requires reading thread rules, see post #1

[Groove]

source: kmc Ph: Paolo Roversi

 

[~RoseBud~]

Those are lovely photos ty

Don't fear the INTERNET!!! Post the pics ;_;

 

[boho_babe]

#1670 Love this editorial I don't think the whole of this was posted all together in the old thread. . .
Alot of Kate's editorials were just posted randomly because there is so much, and I really like to see the whole editorals posted so thanks

 

[aprilLUCKY]

i love her style when she makes her hair up , looks very great

 

[MARLOWE TIGER]

WHERE IS KATE ?
She seems to have disapeared from the face of the earth since going away with Jefferson and Lila-Grace last week - for easter bank holiday.
I Miss not seeing new candids of her..

 

[lemeray]

^ Me too.

 

[Groove]

#1670 Love this editorial I don't think the whole of this was posted all together in the old thread. . .
Alot of Kate's editorials were just posted randomly because there is so much, and I really like to see the whole editorals posted so thanks

I guess I'm having a hard time interpreting the rules for this thread. So -- it's okay to repost pictures if they are part of an editorial in which some pics have not been posted? So for instance, I just posted two previously unseen photos from Tweed Mon Amour. Should I have posted the entire editorial, even though the other pics have been posted before? Am I right? I'm happy to comply, they're just very confusing to me, these rules, and very intimidating. <--that's me being clueless

 

[twin star]

WHERE IS KATE ?
She seems to have disapeared from the face of the earth since going away with Jefferson and Lila-Grace last week - for easter bank holiday.
I Miss not seeing new candids of her..

maybe she is still on vacation with her family. when she's back to london, we'll have new candids.

 

[BooBah]

This is exactly why I stopped posting. After all the dirt this thread's been through...forget it, my nerves are not worth it!

yup

i think in the old thread all the reposting of new pics was annoying, like if people kept repeating pics coz they hadnt searched or bothered to look back a few pages to see that they had already been posted multiple times, but with things like rare editoirals or photos i dont mind seeing them again coz iv often forgotten about them.

anyhoo, on a more relevant note i really love the allure cover posted on the previous page.

 

[Tess]

^Love those Thanks a bunch!!

 

[boho_babe]

I guess I'm having a hard time interpreting the rules for this thread. So -- it's okay to repost pictures if they are part of an editorial in which some pics have not been posted? So for instance, I just posted two previously unseen photos from Tweed Mon Amour. Should I have posted the entire editorial, even though the other pics have been posted before? Am I right? I'm happy to comply, they're just very confusing to me, these rules, and very intimidating. <--that's me being clueless

What I said previously about prefering to see whole editorials was my personal opinion. I think its nicer to see whole editorials, uploaded together rather than just one picture (meaning the ones that aren't known to have been posted).
The new rules for this thread didn't just come from the moderators, it was to do with members being fed up of reposts too.

You certainly shouldn't have to feel intimidated to post in this thread, if you think something hasn't been posted post it (and if it has it can always be deleted). Thank you for posting those pictures, I hadn't seen them.

 

[boubou]

I have a question : Does she choose her clothes herself ? or she's got a personal stylist ?

 

[boho_babe]

I think she choose's her own clothes

 

[BooBah]

god, i dont think kate needs a stylist!!!

 

[lolita_sweet_91]

i found some pics from style.com, hope they haven't been posted yet, they're from this month's w issue

 

[lolita_sweet_91]

style.com

 

[lolita_sweet_91]

same source

 

[lolita_sweet_91]

has really broken up with pete or is she still with him?

 

[oolie coco]

Oh my lord..

 

[ladyflash]

Why don't people just assume that if an editorial or ad isn't brand new, it's already been posted?