Kate Moss - posting requires reading thread rules, see post #1

[Chanelcouture09]

*Dailymail.co.uk

 

[marjanthelion]

why do they call her "worse for wear"? she looks beautiful and actually pretty glamorous for a casual look

 

[styleismatic]

She forgot about her jeans' zip, oops

 

[AlbertNoir]

love that look!

 

[wild roses]

This is the second time the paps have caught her with her jean zipper down. Is she trying to start a new trend?

Zipper issues aside, I do like that look.

 

[styleismatic]

buro247.ru

 

[ALAUU]

I just love the latest outfit, especially those jeans.

 

[Chanelcouture09]

why do they call her "worse for wear"? she looks beautiful and actually pretty glamorous for a casual look

Because she isn't fake tanned, with fake t*ts and a Botoxed face to match, It annoys me incredibly when the british newspapers refer to her in such a negative light but consider the cast of The Only Way Is Essex (a british TV show) celebrities and models, when in fact you have women like Kate, Naomi, etc etc who have worked their arses off all their lives to be shone in such a bad light by journalists who wouldn't even know the word 'celebrity' or 'hard working' or even the word 'Model'.

I think it's also terrible that her home town of Croydon are doing a 'walk of fame' and Kate isn't a part of the icons honored from the city, when she, for me, is the most famous from that area, but you can vote for her to be included Here (select Other and enter her name manually).

 

[Tatjana1989]

I think it's also terrible that her home town of Croydon are doing a 'walk of fame' and Kate isn't a part of the icons honored from the city, when she, for me, is the most famous from that area, but you can vote for her to be included Here (select Other and enter her name manually).

I voted for Kate!!!

 

[misstarshine]

Sometimes worse for wear can just be referring to being a bit drunk

 

[LuLover]

She looks deadly!! Her jeans are amazing and her hair looks great. She doesn't look even a little bit drunk - I think ****ty publications say this about Kate because they can - whatever, she's living life, having fun, Good luck to her!!

 

[nita-karoliina]

She looks fantatsic. which brand are those jeans?? love this look.

 

[vogue28]

Kate for Rimmel Spring 2012:



scan by vogue28

 

[ALAUU]

Can someone explain to me how it's possible that she has a Rimmel contract, but then she also appears in ads for Dior lipstick? I never understood how she could have her fragrance line and then appear in a fragrance ad for YSL.

 

[styleismatic]

Can someone explain to me how it's possible that she has a Rimmel contract, but then she also appears in ads for Dior lipstick? I never understood how she could have her fragrance line and then appear in a fragrance ad for YSL.

I have one idea...
It is simple, she is KATE MOSS, haha

 

[ALAUU]

^ What I meant is how/why does her contract permit her to do that? I would understand if Rimmel and Dior were owned by the same company, but I don't think they are. It's not a matter of 'she's Kate Moss' because even Gisele prioritizes her exclusive contracts. In my opinion it's not very smart of Rimmel to allow Kate to push another company's lipstick.

 

[styleismatic]

I thought you mean that, and my answer was for it. I think her personality and name is still a very good business so big labels doesn't care about that she has her own fragrance or advertising Rimmel, they just want her! And they accept the fact they can not have her only at their side. Maybe this is better for them to have her like this (with other contract) than not to have Kate

 

[Halcyon]

I've thought about that too and I think it's because the two lines of lipstick appeal to completely different markets. When her first line of lipstick came out I bought every single color even the ones I knew I'd never wear, because the were just so cheap: all five of her lipsticks together were less expensive than a tube of Chanel or Dior lipstick. Dior lipstick is a luxury, Rimmel is a (fairly) cheap thrill.

Also, of course, she's Kate Moss she sells and therefore she can do what she wants.

 

[Halcyon]

Also, there's this theory in economics about grouping. Think about home supply stores (like Lowe's or Home Depot in the U.S.) They're competitors so you would expect that they wouldn't be located in the same geographic location. Yet, they are always located near each other. The rational behind this is that people have this vague idea that they want home supplies and if the stores are grouped together they're more likely to go, because they know their needs will be met.

I think there's something like that going on with the simultaneous perfume/lipstick ads ( find it striking not just that she does ads for both, but also that the ads are so similar). Basically each company gets double the advertising because when consumers see the ads the just see an ad with Kate Moss and lipstick. Later when the consumer wants to buy lipstick they don't necessarily remember if the ads they saw were Dior or Rimmel, they just gravitate to whichever brand they were more likely to buy in the first place, but both Dior and Rimmel end up with higher sales.

 

[MayaStar]

her style is now: WOW!