I'm not going to bother any further with the politics and economics discussion, because it's against the rules of this forum.Alexandra8715 said:kisa the fact is that the kaffiyah scarf has massive political significance and the fact that most people are ignorant of this is testament to the way in which western fashion exploits something that had meaning into a money making device.
I'm not blaming the people who wear it without realising what it means. It's not their fault that they arent aware if it. It's just capitalism.
Also, I don't think there is any other 'trendy' garment out there which has anywhere near the same political significance as the kaffiyah. therefore it makes sense that we don't do massive research into the origins of the smock dress lol.
About the smock dresses though, smocking was a utilitarian way of sewing that was forced out of fashion during the industrial revolution, due to the dangers of wearing voluminous clothing in terrible working conditions. Of course, smocking was later taken up by the gentry as fashion. Hmm sounds like rich people abused the disenfranchised and stole their clothes! DAMN THOSE MATERIALISTIC GENTRY!

Some other clothes I can think of for you with political significance are:
Pants (french revolution)
Moccasins (commercialization of first nations culture)