Les_Sucettes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 3,128
- Reaction score
- 278
Yeah, but that's exactly the problem, she would not even have a career going somewhere if it wasn't for Kate. She is no model.
She looks like your average english posh girl. If you got to certain areas in London, you won't see anything else.
When Kate came around she looked uncommon, there was absolutely nothing bland about her, she might not look have like your typical supermodel at the time, but she if you look at her CK press videos, God she looked extraordinary. Plus, she has a great body to carry clothes.
@eizhowa You're totally right. If Kate couldn't do it, Lottie probably won't.
I was trying not to be too negative bout this chick. But I really don't see anything Wow, or even memorable about her. And her instagram just ruined it for me. She's not a model, right now. Perhaps, she can learn. But right now, she ain't.
I was trying not to be too negative bout this chick. But I really don't see anything Wow, or even memorable about her. And her instagram just ruined it for me. She's not a model, right now. Perhaps, she can learn. But right now, she ain't.
liralita
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,199
- Reaction score
- 2
I hear ya, Kate was always my favourite model. I don't think Lottie compares, but I think despite some of the drawbacks discussed here that she could do okay and deliver some nice pictures.
Like I said, it's hard for me to really devil's advocate this one because on one hand I'm going "eh, she's cute, I'll subscribe" and on the other expectations for her are in a totally different realm because she's related to Kate. I don't disagree, I just think that her being met with a chorus of "you're not Kate Moss!" has got to be tough. Which, you know, this industry is most of the time like HeatherAnne said so hopefully she prepared herself for that.
I still like her look, just not because she looks like Kate/is some kind of Kate successor. There just isn't going to be a "new Kate" no matter how many times the industry puts that label on someone's shoulders.
Les_Sucettes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 3,128
- Reaction score
- 278
But the world does not owe her a modelling career, or a high profile modelling job, but she's getting one regardless, simply because of her surname. I find this wrong, and it used to incredibly wrong. I do not understand this attitude now days, of let's see of she does a passable job at it, so then her presence will become justified. No it won't. She would have to be spectacularly good to erase the fact that the only thing to recommend her at the start is that she's Moss's sister.
I was reading an article about her in this Sunday Newspaper where apparently the press could ask her a couple of questions at the CK party but they where forbidden to ask her about Kate, but like the journalist rightly said, what was there to ask her about? I think it sums it up pretty well.
I don't think nepotism in modelling can be compared to nepotism in business generally. In modelling, whoever sells, right?
In what comparable situation from the past was this kind of nepotism frowned upon? I am genuinely interested.
In what comparable situation from the past was this kind of nepotism frowned upon? I am genuinely interested.
Elite13
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2014
- Messages
- 2,353
- Reaction score
- 66
Um so has anyone noticed anything odd about this CK picture?
wmagazine.com
One leg seems to be wayyyy longer than the other.
Also, this is pure nepotism and honestly say all you want about the likes of Cara, Georgia, Kendall etc but at least they have the height/high fashion looks. This girl is no model.
wmagazine.com
One leg seems to be wayyyy longer than the other.
Also, this is pure nepotism and honestly say all you want about the likes of Cara, Georgia, Kendall etc but at least they have the height/high fashion looks. This girl is no model.
How did I not notice?muchiguchi
Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2014
- Messages
- 349
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm gonna be blunt here get prepared.
Her instagram is a disgrace, she drinks like a fish, exposes her self constantly, she is a typical, extremely disappointing example of a teen.
Secondly, money. Money is involved here like always. Sarah Doukas, you know, the one whose business partner is Richard Branson?
She is listed as 5'5, so what she's 5'3, 5'4? The people saying 'oh she photographs tall though', yeah because it's probably been manipulated. And by the way, Kate is only around 5'5, not Storms ridiculous claim of 5'8.
Her proportions are all wrong. Having a C cup at her age when a girls breasts continue to develop into 20's years of age? And even that is probably a false stat provided by Storm, she could be DD for all we know.
She is in sixth form guys, minimum age 16 and clearly very advanced for her age. She will not grow anymore. I don't know why there are comments saying 'can't wait for her to be taller'. Even if she had a tiny amount of growing left, she has probably stunted it with cigarettes and alcohol.
Her twitter is full of self confident and cocky tweets and honestly, even if she looked on this site she would still believe she is the next Kate.
She even posts images which could be classed of p*rn*gr*ph*c with approving emojis next to it.
The minute Kate Moss's daughter is old enough, we will never hear of Lottie again. She is just a quick attempt to earn some extra cash and raise Storms profile.
Storm are the worst agency for signing already connected girls and pushing them as a brand/ name whether they are decent or not.
If she was a normal girl, she would never be scouted and if she had, Storm would have simply kept getting her in, measuring her, telling her she needs to be 5'8, and turning her away when they see she wont grow.
It was never Kate's dad who gave Kate her looks anyway. Kate and her mother are so alike and there is even a photograph of them both lay out on a bed and they look strikingly similar.
Storm scout normal innocent girls who are under the minimum, striking special girls, lead them on for years seeing if they'll grow and then they dump them. Then here they are going against all that for some weak tie of 'Moss' bourgeois riches. Then try and photograph her in rich London surroundings when really she is this average girl as you can see on instagram.
All I'm saying is just keep the word 'money' in your minds because there are some seriously naive comments going on.
Her instagram is a disgrace, she drinks like a fish, exposes her self constantly, she is a typical, extremely disappointing example of a teen.
Secondly, money. Money is involved here like always. Sarah Doukas, you know, the one whose business partner is Richard Branson?
She is listed as 5'5, so what she's 5'3, 5'4? The people saying 'oh she photographs tall though', yeah because it's probably been manipulated. And by the way, Kate is only around 5'5, not Storms ridiculous claim of 5'8.
Her proportions are all wrong. Having a C cup at her age when a girls breasts continue to develop into 20's years of age? And even that is probably a false stat provided by Storm, she could be DD for all we know.
She is in sixth form guys, minimum age 16 and clearly very advanced for her age. She will not grow anymore. I don't know why there are comments saying 'can't wait for her to be taller'. Even if she had a tiny amount of growing left, she has probably stunted it with cigarettes and alcohol.
Her twitter is full of self confident and cocky tweets and honestly, even if she looked on this site she would still believe she is the next Kate.
She even posts images which could be classed of p*rn*gr*ph*c with approving emojis next to it.
The minute Kate Moss's daughter is old enough, we will never hear of Lottie again. She is just a quick attempt to earn some extra cash and raise Storms profile.
Storm are the worst agency for signing already connected girls and pushing them as a brand/ name whether they are decent or not.
If she was a normal girl, she would never be scouted and if she had, Storm would have simply kept getting her in, measuring her, telling her she needs to be 5'8, and turning her away when they see she wont grow.
It was never Kate's dad who gave Kate her looks anyway. Kate and her mother are so alike and there is even a photograph of them both lay out on a bed and they look strikingly similar.
Storm scout normal innocent girls who are under the minimum, striking special girls, lead them on for years seeing if they'll grow and then they dump them. Then here they are going against all that for some weak tie of 'Moss' bourgeois riches. Then try and photograph her in rich London surroundings when really she is this average girl as you can see on instagram.
All I'm saying is just keep the word 'money' in your minds because there are some seriously naive comments going on.
Last edited by a moderator:
VersaceVixen009
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 1,010
- Reaction score
- 4
Those Calvin shots are incredibly average. Sure she's very pretty and one shot holds similarity to a shot Kate did for Calvin, but I don't see her as groundbreaking the way her sister was and is or having potential in high fashion. At most she could do a Burberry campaign as a brit/spawn of a celebrity.
muchiguchi
Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2014
- Messages
- 349
- Reaction score
- 0
muchiguchi
Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2014
- Messages
- 349
- Reaction score
- 0
The point though is that being private and trashy is very different to purposely portraying yourself to be trashy.
Quoted from the Telegraph article 'Kate Moss in quotes':
Even in this age of social media, Moss has declined to sign up and share the slightest detail (though she does have a secret, protected Instagram account), something she credits to her most famous ex, Johnny Depp.
"He told me 'never complain, never explain'. That's why I don't use Twitter and things like that," she told Vanity Fair in 2012. "I don't want people to know what is true all the time and that's what keeps the mystery."
Also, Kate comes from a time where it was weird if you didn't have a cigarette in your hand and there were adverts claiming smoking was good for your health..Lottie smoking today at her age compared to Kate's is completely different
Quoted from the Telegraph article 'Kate Moss in quotes':
Even in this age of social media, Moss has declined to sign up and share the slightest detail (though she does have a secret, protected Instagram account), something she credits to her most famous ex, Johnny Depp.
"He told me 'never complain, never explain'. That's why I don't use Twitter and things like that," she told Vanity Fair in 2012. "I don't want people to know what is true all the time and that's what keeps the mystery."
Also, Kate comes from a time where it was weird if you didn't have a cigarette in your hand and there were adverts claiming smoking was good for your health..Lottie smoking today at her age compared to Kate's is completely different
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that is just how the new generation is.. They grow up with everyone over-sharing on facebook etc. Kate didn't grow up in this enviroment.
Elite13
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2014
- Messages
- 2,353
- Reaction score
- 66
She's very short and her measurements aren't ideal so she won't even have a career on the runway I'd say. Her look is average and not interesting, she just looks like a typical teenager and it's pretty obvious she's only with Storm because of Kate who she looks nothing like.
The only shots I've liked of her have been from her Dazed ed and that's mainly because of the clothes and how her hair and eyebrows look so I agree with muchiguci about how they can dress her up in all the designer gear they want but I just don't get it.
Just wait until Lila comes of age then it's bye bye Lottie.
The only shots I've liked of her have been from her Dazed ed and that's mainly because of the clothes and how her hair and eyebrows look so I agree with muchiguci about how they can dress her up in all the designer gear they want but I just don't get it.
Just wait until Lila comes of age then it's bye bye Lottie.
