I doutn understand how one piece of clothing can eb more natural than another?Originally posted by crystalized@Mar 17th, 2004 - 12:24 pm
![]()
it looks disturbing to me.
but i think its fine when guys were kilts, i mean...it looks more 'natural'.
I doutn understand how one piece of clothing can eb more natural than another? [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Spacemiu+Mar 24th, 2004 - 12:14 am--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Spacemiu @ Mar 24th, 2004 - 12:14 am)</div><div class='quotemain'> <!--QuoteBegin-crystalized@Mar 17th, 2004 - 12:24 pm
![]()
it looks disturbing to me.
but i think its fine when guys were kilts, i mean...it looks more 'natural'.
Same here. It's fine if it's part of a traditional garment. Otherwise...Originally posted by saad@Mar 18th, 2004 - 3:53 pm
i think teh arab 'thob's' and scottish kils look fine because theyre traditional wear.....but im not in favor of guys wearing leather skirts and mini wrap arounds...thats just not right![]()
![]()
those are KURTASOriginally posted by tott@Mar 28th, 2004 - 5:58 am
but once in a while you'd see him in a long white tunic (ended mid-calf) and slim white trousers with a little white cap; simply stunning!
I agree with MAX 100% , no straight guy would be caught dead in a skirt......I mean come on...Originally posted by Max@Mar 27th, 2004 - 1:06 am
Whoever said that guys' skirts will be a "big trend" can't possibly be serious. I can see no average style-savvy western guy wearing these. It's one thing to do a track jacket under a blazer- that just looks strange sometimes to the bystander, but I can't imagine anyone but trend-whores wearing these in public. Kilts, particularly utitlity kilts, were remotely on the radar amongst the indie crowd last year but even then you'd only see the most hardcore scenesters wearing them and it faded real quick.