Michelle Williams | Page 284 | the Fashion Spot

Michelle Williams

Why are people disappointed in her GQ ed? It's not like Michelle is some 20-year old up and coming actress who has decided to do a photoshoot like this (e.g. Jennifer Lawrence). Michelle is a grown woman who just happened to play one of the world's biggest Sex Symbols last year. It makes perfect sense for her to do GQ and the editorial is well done and tasteful. Anne Hathaway, Kate Winslet, Halle Berry, Charlize Theron, Angelina Jolie and countless others have done GQ at some point in their career.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It was quite a shock to see her in GQ, but I think she looks great. I know what I've always liked about her was not playing the sex appeal card, but whatever, I don't care that much to be disappointed by this now. I don't think she will be very pleased to see herself on the newstands either, I think embarassed would be a more appropriate adjective to use. Now that interview was way more exposing than the photos.
 
All those actresses did a shoot for a men´s magazines at the beginning of their career as did Michelle in late 90s, I think it´s a shame that she´s doing them now. It´s not the fact that she´s posing in lingerie it´s the fact that she´s doing it in a men´s magazine. I don´t like when women are being sexual for the sake of men. If this was done in another type of mag probably I wouldn´t have a problem cause yes, she looks great and the pics are somewhat tasteful... I think Vanity Fair would have been a better choice.

In a fashion related topic, next week is the SAG Awards (she is nominated, right?). I hope she´ll wear something great :)
 
For the record, I'm actually not mad that she did GQ whatsoever. For me, it's the fact that she looks so awkward and uncomfortable in the editorial. It could have easily been done to show that Michelle can be sexy and at the same time comfortable with her body and sexy side.
 
Guess who's first acting role was on Baywatch in 1993? So cute!!

michellewilliamsfirstro.jpg

My screencap
 
OMG...that GC cover is sooooo heavily photoshopped. im really shocked by all of this. i thought she was one of the more respectable girls in hollywood, but this reeks of ocsar politics and selling out. YUK!
 
I love that candid outfit; she looks adorable.

But booooooo GQ. (Though I suppose some boys will be loving it.;))
 
She's on a Jason Wu kick atm it seems.

And GQ wasn't Weinstein's doing, what is wrong with some of you? These pictures were taken last year and were most likely held until 2012 once she started getting traction for her performance. It's clear from interviews that Weinstein has the upmost respect for Williams as an actress and as a mother. I think the post in #826 shows partly why she decided to do this shoot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really hate the GQ cover and shoot, I think it's a huge mistake to have it out just before the Oscars she will def. be nominated but it will hurt her chances of winning, esoecailly in the year where the favorites and very respected Meryl Streep and Viola Davis will def. be nominated.

Did Weinstein make her do this shoot to get some traction in the box office since "My week with Marilyn" has been a box office failure?
 
Is the PR team at Jason Wu paying her to wear his clothes? He makes nice clothes, but I would rather see Michelle in Chanel.
 
I agree that the interview was way too revealing more than the photos. Was the journalist writing a fiction story with all those pauses and looks he described or conducting an interview? I've always felt she prefers to be private in her personal life.
 
I swear some of you make me roll my eyes so hard ...
First of all, I agree that the cover for GQ is indeed an awful picture. The quote on the cover made me gag. The spread itself is way better executed. If all of this would be in, say, Vougue, none of you would complain. So whatever, she doesn't have her boobs out and in the end it feels like she really IS in character for the whole thing. It's definitely promotion for the film but do some of you really think she was literally forced to do that? Michelle doesn't seem to be easily talked in something like that at all. She strikes me as someone who wants to do things they've never done before, which manifests itself in taking new, challenging roles etc. Maybe not every decision is wise. I'll highlight the quote in the article that basically explains the whole thing:
"I don't think things through very often—I don't project into the future about how a situation will turn out. Even the simplest things, I'm guilty of making really bad decisions a lot of the time. In my work it's a capacity that's served me well, but in my life it can be a problem."

Except I don't think this is a big deal at all, but the reactions here say otherwise. Well, who would've expect that here?!!:rolleyes:
As for the interview: it is indeed a very private insight into her life. I found it to be really touching. How people here basically shame her for talking about Heath is beyond me. It's not even the biggest part of the interview anyway. It seems she's ready to open up about it a bit more than in the past, but till i see her calling the interviewer/mag out for twisting her words or whatever, I believe that she wanted to talk about it and wasn't forced to do so (in the past she was able to say no to these questions).

Yeah, sorry for the novel.
 
its the oscar season oh so vicious and everything will be believed to be marketing for winning. i understand your frustration and i cant wait for the season to be finished. its short and people have fun with the conspiracy theories. i dont think its mean spirited.
 
I don't know if this was posted yet, but here's a link to her Full GQ interview

I think it's a great interview! No idea why it's upsetting some people. :huh:


Also, here's a new article from Lainey Gossip, that basically sums up what I've been thinking:

The Perils Of Being The Best Actress

Many of you have written asking for commentary on the Michelle William GQ cover and interview. The story made headlines everywhere yesterday. This is most likely what you saw:

Michelle Williams talks about and cries over Heath Ledger.

It wasn’t totally misleading, no. That did indeed happen. Most of you who’ve written to me did not have kind words about Williams in this piece, particularly since you would have only read the excerpted sections and not the entire article for its flow.

I’m not saying your criticisms are wrong. Not at all. But I encourage you to read the entire article at GQ first. Because I wonder if your reaction would have been less...intense... if you’d gone there first and received her words as they were as part of a whole conversation, between two people, one of whom was tasked, admittedly, from the very beginning, to get her to an emotional place and then elicit from her an emotional response on the subject of Heath Ledger. And the journalist, he admits as much in his writing. Most of the time we only hear the answer. When you read a quick headline on a website, you don’t often know what the question was.

He actually asked her where she was when she heard about Heath being dead.

I mean...few people could actually go there, you know?

And he did. And I don’t blame him. And please don’t come here pretending that you do. Because if you’re reading this site regularly, you know YOU WANTED TO KNOW. I want to know. I want to know EVERYTHING. It’s a sick twisted thing, isn’t it? I want to know if she threw herself on the ground and sobbed. I want to know their last conversation. I want to know their final email. I want to know what she said to him in her heart at his funeral. I want to know how she expressed her anger at his selfishness. I want to know how often she pulled out their pictures, videos, memories. If that information were available, I would drown in it, compulsively, gorge in the morbid tragedy of another person’s suffering, and then, possibly, curiosity satisfied, I’d lift up my ugly head and call her a famewhore.

After all, that was the headline that attracted me. Wasn’t that the headline that attracted you?

Michelle Williams talks about and cries over Heath Ledger.

We rushed to click.

And what did she actually say?

Well, she describes, briefly, in very non-specific, eyerolly airy fairy supernatural terms how they were drawn together. She also discusses how hard it was to focus after his death, how she coped with the paparazzi, with the prying. And she reveals her worries about her daughter - what Matilda will miss for losing her father so young.

Then came this question, the most probing one of them all:

Do you think there was a part of you that imagined the two of you would somehow end up together?

I won’t excerpt her answers. Because I really want you to read them in their intended context, especially in this case, not of a Jessica Biel complaining about being too pretty, or a Rooney Mara aloofing up her own ***, but of a woman who had a child with a man who drugged himself to death in front of the whole world. I love Michelle. I am a Michelle apologist. I don’t think we can know what it must be like to look at your daughter and see your dead lover in her face every single day. I don’t think it’s fair that we put a time limit on her grief just because “they weren’t even together anymore”. Really??? Not even me, a piece of sh-t gossip b*tch who deserves a daily flogging, not even I can draw on that as an argument against. When grief becomes an obstacle to a coworker, when others have to compensate for your grief-driven shortcomings, when you don’t show up for work and someone has to do extra because you’re busy grieving, when someone goes overtime because your grief is a priority, then, maybe, I’d be more onside with those who attack her on the basis of “she doesn’t have to be so sad, they had already broken up when he died!” Pretty sure that doesn’t apply in this case. That I can defend.

Let me explain what I cannot defend:

She cries a lot. I had a hard time with that but it’s not the worst. And I don’t have a hard time with what she really said about Heath Ledger, her exact words. She was led there. The question for me is how why she AGREED TO BE LED THERE. It’s the timing. As it often is, it’s not the what, but the when.

A GQ interview is not a 4 minute junket interview on a day when 40 outlets try and get a sound bite. It’s understood that GQ interviews, Vanity Fair, Esquire, sometimes Vogue, depending on the writer, require more of a commitment, with the expectation that there will be some revelations. You will note that she spent 3 days with the journalist, and not just in an office either. They drove around, they had coffee, and this was no surprise to her. It’s not like he kidnapped her and put a tape recorder between her breasts and forced her to start talking. You spend that much time with a reporter, you have to expect the inevitable. Her publicist knows this, her manager knows this, and Harvey Weinsten, oh he knows it very, very well.

These are the perils of being the Best Actress.

It happened to Natalie Portman last year. When she dragged her baby bump around every red carpet and lectured us on the magic of her creation. It happened to Reese Witherspoon, holding together her dead marriage, frauding out a perfect life with a suddenly noticeable Tennessee twang in exchange for the right to call herself an Oscar-winner.

It’s now happening to Michelle Williams, who led with the daughter as part of a campaign strategy positioning her like she’s the poster mother for Single Mothers on stage at the Golden Globes, reminding us that, yes, yes, I deserve to be Best Actress because my daughter is the most important person in my life. Welcome to my personal life!

We grew to hate Reese. We grew to hate Natalie. Are we growing to hate Michelle?

That’s what you sacrifice for Oscar. For the ones who are just at around 30, and all three of them hover around 30, this is what you lose.

What’s interesting too though is why we don’t hate as hard on the men. With such rage and contempt. Something to discuss when I am Dean of the Faculty of Celebrity Studies.

I encourage you to click here for the full GQ article featuring Michelle Williams.
laineygossip
 
I will never hate Michelle Williams. She's the whole package when it comes to fashion, acting and personality. And she's nice. You never hear a bad word about her.

**Edited ***
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I will never hate Michelle Williams. She's the whole package when it comes to fashion, acting and personality. And she's nice. You never hear a bad word about her.
*Edtied*

you're reading my mind ^_^
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,707
Messages
15,312,698
Members
89,723
Latest member
jack0001
Back
Top