Mischa prefers not to be as overtly sexual as Rachel... | Page 4 | the Fashion Spot

Mischa prefers not to be as overtly sexual as Rachel...

Taper-Jean Girl said:
uh-uh dont even try to blame her age, or lack there of, as reason for her being socially-********. Im 19 as well and I would never, ever say half the sh!t that seems to stream out of her mouth. She's like an unstoppable moron. Im suprised she can get half her words for her footing being CONSTANTLY in her mouth. Same for Paltrow. Shes a spoiled, entitled yup without an inch of grace and tact and the two of them cant seem to say the appropriate thing unless reciting lines from a script. :angry: The two of them need a "Life Script" written expertly by the world's best PR...

Voluptuous is also a word with many meanings: http://www.wordreference.com/definition/voluptuous
such as juicy, busty, luscious

However, I think the word has been used a lot to describe overweight women which gives it negative connotations. Still, it's a bit weird because Rachel looks like she has B cups, so I don't really think it applies either way.

I think the idea of girls wanting to be thinner in order to be less sexual is bs. If you want to be less sexual, just dress up in a tent or loose shirts. That's certainly going to make both Rachel and Mischa and anyone else who tries look less sexually appealing....

Also, I have to say that there ARE other cultures, such as the UK, where people are less concerned with celebs saying "what's appropriate" all the time. I hear they call people who say what's appropriate all the time fake and boring.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
she can't act for sh*t, so she needs something to keep her from falling off the face of the earth, hence the relentless stupidity...personally, i think she wears more provocative clothing than Rachel so i don't understand how she's not trying to be overtly sexual
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,402
Messages
15,260,477
Members
88,384
Latest member
rootloop
Back
Top