Nina Ricci F/W 2023.24 Paris

Of course i had to come here for the comments... Thank you all

Really a sad parade of horrendous stuff to burn, this is what's wrong about contemporary times... I dont care how many followers you have, this really proves that either you have or not vision, and also going to st Martins school its not a credential in anything Safe, here s proof of it

I still remember those dreamy days of Theyskens at Ricci
 
Imagine if Simone Rocha had the job…or Roksanda, or any other designer with a delicate modern take on ready to wear.

Last year the flagship store in Paris (in the same building as the Nina Ricci creative studio) shut down and they opened a Paco Rabanne shop. This was very sad.
But I guess it was a smart decision because the brand is leading nowhere…
 
The epitome of a sh!t show and as if things could not get worse it ended with the model looking like she had a literal Sperm Whale's tale. This designer needs to be fired and admit herself to a mental asylum.
 
it’s very telling that the vogue review barely covers the clothes. I wonder when this era of gender fluidity being worth more currency than actual skill will end.
Here's the review in question:

BY NICOLE PHELPS
March 3, 2023


From the start, Harris Reed has upended fashion’s established way of doing things: getting a look in Vogue, on Harry Styles no less, before his first fashion show, and on the day of that runway debut landing the kind of profile in The New Yorker that designers twice his age are still holding out hope for.

Last September, days after his third London fashion show, he was appointed the creative director of Nina Ricci, extending his disruptive streak. Reed is a Central Saint Martins grad, which used to be the kind of credential you needed to land a job in a design studio, and then work your way up. Online community building is the metric that increasingly matters today. With his social media fluency and his significant following, Reed skipped the years of on-the-job training and landed a front man position.

In the lead-up to this Paris show, Styles wore a black Nina Ricci tuxedo by Reed accessorized by an enormous silk flower at the throat to the BRIT Awards, suggesting that his Nina Ricci would be as gender fluid as his own label, a new direction for the French brand. Before and after that, Adele wore a custom Reed creation for Ricci to perform in Las Vegas, and Florence Pugh chose another for the BAFTAs.

That celebrity endorsements and red carpet placements will be important to the new Nina Ricci strategy was evident from the front row, where the stylists Law Roach (Zendaya) and Marni Senofonte (Beyoncé) mixed with Kiernan Shipka and Richie Shazam. More so, it was made clear by the looks that came down the runway, which were tilted to big evenings and photo calls, with polka dots galore, fluoro feathers, giant bows, and a surrealistic baby lamb print commissioned from the artist Jeanine Brito.

Pugh’s orange tulle gown made an appearance, only split into two pieces with a slice of peekaboo midriff. First modeled by Styles at the BRITs, the tailoring looked like it took its cues from Bianca and Mick Jagger’s matching 1971 wedding suits—down to the extra-wide brimmed hats. Runway-spanning circle skirts leaned perilously close to costume. And then there was the show-closing hobble skirt—the model who wore it deserves a prize for not toppling over.

A pouf-sleeved denim jacket and matching high-waisted jean flares provided some counter-balance, but the drama was the point. “Everyone has really turned out all the stops, it’s a bold new statement,” Reed said backstage. There’s no easing into these jobs, but the finesse expected of the Paris runways may come with more time. Where Reed is way out ahead of some of his peers is with his cast. Precious Lee opened the show, and as she vamped for the cameras, it was a reminder of the too narrow and old-fashioned visions of beauty seen elsewhere this week.
They talk about Reed's career trajectory, before mentioning the audience and skimming over three looks that have already walked on the red carpet. The review ends with them chastising other designers for not casting everyone under the sun in their shows.
 
What makes me wonder is what did Anna Wintour, for instance, think of this collection.
The pretty ominous review from Phelps must have been authorised by Anna (or somebody like-minded in terms of the strategy). So I really don't get it.

I really understand that people are disappointed (or not surprised) by what Demna has shown us...but this is another level.
That sequined black and white stripes with that crinolined bottom - it just screams "cheap!".
I only feel sorry for all the ostrish feathers that have been used for this collection.
I also wonder what were the atelier people really thinking of these clothes while making them :D
 
I think this video from ShowStudio sums up pretty well this whole debate around Reed's debut at Nina Ricci and the way it was reviewed by the media.
 
Gender fluid clothes were a decision from the C Suite hoping to cut costs by producing less variation while still retaining sales numbers. Thats not working out so theyre dumping it as fast as they can.

I lurk here and i remember someone getting emotional over Pilatis stupid genderless collection which went nowhere. The whole point of fashion is to come up with solutions for people to wear in real life - nobody is gonna do the hard work of styling themselves- thats the designers job. Genderless clothes can work but only in limited styles and the price cant be higher than a Bridge line - otherwise it puts too much labor on the customer who is paying for the full designer idea.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,571
Messages
15,189,480
Members
86,464
Latest member
xd123456
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->