Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by Magnus, Dec 3, 2009.
Is it me or does Hilary look squashed?
What is Nylon's obsession with "The Mixtape"
I am officially taking back any previous appreciation of Nylon. Blake Lively, Sienna Miller, Kristen Stewart, Lindsay Lohan... and now Hilary? No thank you. I'm so tired of these irrelevant celebrity personas always being covered by the magazine. I guess I'm too old for Nylon's target readers - at 21 years old.
Hilary Duff is the only Disney star I actually like. Don't know why but I'm always rooting for her.
With that said, the cover sucks.
yep this is stupid and MGMT...this is not 2007, nylon.
Bad... Weird expression!
NYLON you are killing me...
Hillary Duff?!??!??! GROSS
I think she looks good, a she is a very pick for a cover. Im tired of the people who thinks that if youre very famous you cant appear on Nylon... its just another magazine and looking the economy, you cant put an "oh-im-so-indie" star on the cover. They need to hugh a massive crow!
My exact thoughts.
could have been worse, could have been better...
eh. Nylon is pretty irrelevant these days. Though I remember once they were a great mag. Oh wel...
I think American mags ran out of decent celebrities to put on their covers so they cast a has been or someone who hasn't been on the spotlight just for the hell of it. It's sad.
Nylon was a great mag when it was strictly online, or when they first started printing on newstands. Then they got money and started paying b-list and c-list celebrities in their covers.
I don't even understand the point of Nylon anymore.
that's a humiliating cover shot.
Hey people I think its safe to say its Nylon...
I'd take Hilary on the cover over Blake/Megan/Kristen any day of the week, and seriously, it's not like she's on covers left right and centre is it.. She's not turned up on many in ages.
That's why it's off putting because of the fact that she hasn't been on the spotlight in ages. And it's not like they choose a cover girl a month before the actual issue, they choose a cover girl a few months ahead, so putting her on the cover doesn't really make any sense when they've been putting girls like Blake and Kristen who have been making headlines.
But they'll have known for months she was going to be in Gossip Girl...? I've known she's going to be in for months, so I'm more than sure they knew she'd be back in the 'spotlight' now.