Prada Group acquires Versace for €1.25 billion

The last thing I need is Versace styled by Lotta Volkova. I would love to see Carine Roitfeld though, it could work in my opinion
I love Carine but her work the past decade hasn't been her best, and I'm not sure her style would mesh well with Dario. My guess is he'll choose an established name, but someone closer to his age and universe/culture.
 

Bloomberg​

Versace’s ‘Quiet Luxury’ Blunder Opened Door to Prada Takeover​


A Versace store in Paris.

Photographer: Cyril Marcilhacy/Bloomberg

April 10, 2025

Fashion executive John Idol thought Versace leaned too much on ornate designs and aimed to fix it by dialing things down, then boosting prices.

Fashion executive John Idol thought Versace leaned too much on ornate designs and aimed to fix it by dialing things down, then boosting prices.

When his company, Capri Holdings Ltd., acquired the fashion house in 2018, he said his strategy would double the brand’s revenue over the next decade. Six years later, that vision has unraveled. He’s sold Versace to Prada SpA for $1.38 billion, a roughly $700 million loss, and sales growth is significantly off course.
Capri is expecting Versace to report revenue of around $813 million in the current fiscal year that ended in March. That’s below the $843 million in sales it reported in fiscal year 2020, the first full year that Capri was running the brand.

Versace’s future now rests with Prada, a company that’s nimbly navigated the recent slowdown in luxury spending. Revenue at Prada, which also includes the Miu Miu brand, rose 17% in 2024. By contrast, analysts surveyed by Bloomberg expect Versace to report a decline of around 20% in sales for the fiscal year that ends in March versus the prior year. Capri also owns the Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo brands, which have reported sales declines, too.

Capri said in a statement on Thursday announcing the deal that it would use the proceeds from the Versace sale to make investments in Michael Kors.
“We also believe a sale of Jimmy Choo would be the right move for Capri,” Bernstein analyst Aneesha Sherman wrote in a research note Thursday.

When Idol took over Versace, the brand was known for its ornate designs and its signature Barocco print, but he later steered it toward the more muted “quiet luxury” trend. Idol said the shift was necessary because Versace had become overreliant on the print. “You don’t want a store that is 70% Barocco — and that became a bit of a crutch for the company,” Idol, who is chairman and chief executive officer of Capri, told analysts in February.
He also acknowledged the shift was too abrupt. While affluent shoppers embraced the more muted designs, the mid-tier shoppers who drive Versace’s sales did not. Revenue growth started to slow.
“It’s not been the turnaround story that they wanted it to be,” Sherman said in an interview. “The strategies haven’t been the right strategies.”
.

Compounding the problem, Versace hiked prices and reduced the amount of affordable items it sold. “We went too far, too fast,” Idol said in February. “Customers who used to shop with us came in and said, ‘I like that, but I can’t afford all of that,’” Idol said. “Probably the customers are sitting there saying, ‘Wait a minute. What happened to the old Versace?’”
Now, Versace is scrambling to undo the damage. The brand is lowering price points on some core items: In the fall, silk shirts will start at $990 instead of around $1,500, the company told Bloomberg News, and its sneakers have become more affordable. Its Galaxia style, for example, starts at $550.

The brand also reduced discounts. While end-of-season sales on apparel and footwear still start at 50%, the second markdown is now 60%, the company said, versus 70% in the past. And Versace stopped putting handbags on sale at its full-price boutiques.
The shift “is painful,” Idol said, “but it is the right thing to do.”


In March, the company announced that Donatella Versace was stepping down as chief creative officer, a role she’s held since 1997. She’s become chief brand ambassador and supports the company’s philanthropic efforts. Former Miu Miu executive Dario Vitale succeeded her on April 1.
“We are confident that his talent and vision will be instrumental to Versace’s future growth,” Idol said about Vitale in a statement.
Capri’s Chief Financial Officer Thomas J. Edwards left in April for the role of CFO and chief operating officer at Macy’s Inc. “His departure comes at a precarious time,” Telsey Advisory Group analyst Dana Telsey wrote in a research note. “Leadership transitions always carry an element of risk.”
Risks have increased further, and Capri’s shares have fallen further since President Donald Trump pledged to implement sweeping tariffs.

Pyrrhic Victory​

The sale of Versace to Prada is a Pyrrhic victory for Idol, who has led Capri since 2003. Wall Street cheered when Idol appeared to have found a potential buyer for Versace: Capri shares rose on March 3 after Bloomberg News reported on the deal talks.
But Idol’s plan wasn’t to split Capri into pieces. He aimed to sell the whole company to Tapestry Inc., which owns Coach and Kate Spade, for $8.5 billion in 2023. That would have afforded Idol a grand exit after decades at the helm of Capri. What could have been a crowning achievement, though, was toppled last year when a federal judge ruled the combination of the rival conglomerates would harm competition in the US handbag market.

Idol, 66, had already tried to take steps to ease out of his day-to-day CEO role in 2021. Capri’s board appointed Joshua Schulman to lead the company so Idol could move on to become executive chairman. Several months later, in an unexplained and surprising about-face, Capri said Schulman was leaving the company and Idol would remain CEO and chairman.

While the battle over Tapestry’s acquisition of Capri was playing out in the courts, Idol and his team didn’t appear to be drawing up a Plan B for their remaining brands.
“The company used the excuse of the deal with Tapestry for its inertia,” GlobalData analyst Neil Saunders wrote in a research note in February. “That excuse is no longer viable, and the company needs to do the heavy lifting of reinvention.”
The funny thing is that a dialed-down Versace can be done. Giannini has done more sober, minimalist collections in the past (lots of collections throughout the 90s). That said, they're never going to be the oversized camel coat and ballet flat minimalism of The Row. It's not gonna happen.
 
The funny thing is that a dialed-down Versace can be done. Giannini has done more sober, minimalist collections in the past (lots of collections throughout the 90s). That said, they're never going to be the oversized camel coat and ballet flat minimalism of The Row. It's not gonna happen.
But what defines the brand among the public eye is the Donatella-lite Versace woman that is sexy and fearless a bit like TF's Gucci wonan in its heyday.
 
I hate how business people analyses things. They clearly base their opinion or assumptions instead of research. Thinking that Versace is about, only about prints? Gianni and Donatella have made entire collections without prints.
So now, everything that is not printed is Quiet luxury?
Just for that, I would love for the new designer’s first collection to be print-free.

The best prints Gianni did anyway were always the black & white when he mixed multiple patterns of black & white on silk!
 
@Salvatore Because I think the “poor little Donatella” narrative people have is silly.
Did I say poor little Donatella ? I simply think she deserves a good send off after nearly 30 years at her brother's brand. I'm sorry, but I have to say your attitude comes across a bit sour and negative in a lot of your interactions on here.
 
I hate how business people analyses things. They clearly base their opinion or assumptions instead of research. Thinking that Versace is about, only about prints?

I think in this case he agrees with you. He is showing his frustration with most of Versace’s turnover being Barocco printed merchandise. They shouldn’t be surprised a fashion brand sells mostly labeled merchandise, but also signature prints in general are much less neutral than a small logo to work with let alone the connotations around the specific print in question.

The problem is that their fashion proposition was too weak and complacent to shift or expand the customer base. We saw how many mountains Marc and Nicolas had to move to keep LV monogram fashionable whereas with Pucci LVMH was too complacent and just resigned it to a resort brand.
 
Okay? And? If Donatella knew she was leaving, why didn't she arrange a celebration herself? What exactly was stopping her? People are acting like Miuccia was preventing her from doing something grand.
Maybe at the time the collection was being made she didn't know the outcome of her staying or leaving ? Budgets ? No one mentioned Miuccia at all, did they ? This is directed at Capri if anybody.
 
The reasoning behind the Prada-Versace acquisition:
What’s Behind the Prada Group 1.25 Billion-euro Deal to Buy Versace
Prada's management sees untapped potential in Versace’s global brand recognition, aiming to evolve its bold aesthetic and leveraging the group’s platform.

By Luisa Zargani
April 10, 2025, 2:09pm

MILAN —
Versace has “huge potential” and global brand awareness, according to Lorenzo Bertelli, head of CSR at Prada Group.

During a conference call scheduled with analysts and the press on Thursday afternoon, shortly after confirming that the Italian luxury group is acquiring 100 percent of Versace from Capri Holdings for 1.25 billion euros, Bertelli referred to how “a lot of people may think that Versace is far away from the aesthetics of our existing brand portfolio, but I believe this is exactly a strength for our group, because there are no overlaps in terms of creativity and in terms of customers.”

For this reason, the acquisition “is super important to really reach new audiences and to express a different kind of message,” said Bertelli, who, with his mother Miuccia Prada, is understood to have been one of the main proponents of buying Versace within the group.

Also, he highlighted the Prada Group’s platform, which is “naturally scalable,” already working with Prada, Miu Miu, Church’s and Car Shoe. He admitted this “is going to be a big job, but it’s already within our way of operating.”

While Versace’s business is smaller, Bertelli said “we have been amazed” at seeing its recognition around the world, ranking “among the top five, 10 brands,” which means “the potential is huge, but we know very well that to express that potential is not a walk in the park.” However, “we believe we have the knowledge long term to make this transformation and make this brand successful.”

He touted the group’s commitment to creativity and the investments in its industrial platform and capabilities since the ‘80s, which Versace can leverage, and the work done on omnichannel distribution.

“I believe that in a moment where everybody was growing, and we maybe struggled a bit more and had to tackle difficulties, we prepared ourselves somehow for this moment when of course, the markets are not in great shape. We know our limits very well and our strengths, and so we believe we can deliver long-term success,” he said.

Bertelli underscored that he would “not talk about revolution” at Versace. “Miu Miu has been a lesson for us as we have not dramatically changed it, it’s been more of an evolution. Miu Miu has been on a remarkable growth trajectory and registered a record year in 2024, with retail sales soaring 93 percent.

“Sometimes little things here and there spark a huge difference,” Bertelli said. “I think we don’t need to change the brand, we need to just evolve it and make the right things happen and together bring back Versace to be a huge success. So we need just to be patient, and we know very well that there is no one single ingredient for success.”

In a statement, his father Patrizio Bertelli, Prada Group chairman and executive director, said the deal will “build a new chapter for a brand with which we share a strong commitment to creativity, craftmanship and heritage. We aim to continue Versace’s legacy celebrating and reinterpreting its bold and timeless aesthetic; at the same time, we will provide it with a strong platform, reinforced by years of ongoing investments and rooted in longstanding relationships.”

The transaction will be funded by 1.5 billion euros of new debt composed of a 1 billion euro term-loan and a 500 million euro bridge facility. It is expected to close in the second half of 2025.

Up until last week, the company was rumored to be on its way to pay 1.5 billion euros for both Versace and Jimmy Choo.

On Future Creative Direction and Management
Andrea Guerra, Prada Group chief executive officer, was asked about Dario Vitale, who in March was appointed chief creative officer, succeeding Donatella Versace, who was named brand ambassador. Prada executives did not mention Donatella Versace on the call, however, nor did they address her future and whether she would remain a brand ambassador.

There had been speculation that her stepping down as creative director helped clear the way for Capri to sell Versace. Vitale at the end of January exited his role of ready-to-wear design director at Miu Miu, and Guerra underscored that it was “his own decision, independent and very personal,” and that it was not the harbinger of this acquisition.

Pressed for further comment on finding Vitale at Versace, Guerra said,” We are happy to find him as a trusted pair of hands in such an important position for the future of the brand, we are very happy to really welcome all the team, wherever they are in the world and whatever they’re doing. We really need to be warm and give everyone the opportunity to show their impact and their talent.”

On questions about the senior management, Guerra said that “in the last three years, we have gone through an evolution in our organization, and in terms of our managerial attitude. So we have verticalized our brands, and we will continue like this. We are adding Versace, and we will have another vertical asset. From an industrial point of view, we will have a division by brands.”

As for Versace’s CEO Emmanuel Gintzburger, “we will begin the job with him,” Guerra said. Gintzburger’s future at Versace had been questioned even under Capri’s ownership since he is understood to have butted heads with Donatella Versace on several occasions.

Asked about the level of involvement of Miuccia Prada in the creative process, Guerra said “absolutelty none. The involvement will be in the fact that she’s the biggest shareholder of the company, but nothing in terms of creativity.”

Thanking Capri Holdings “for having preserved and enhanced the heritage of this wonderful brand, and despite the sector uncertainties,” Guerra said. “We look at the future with confidence, focused on a long-term strategic vision. Diligently, we will put all necessary efforts to obtain what is our final goal, which is a sustainable success.”

Guerra said future plans for Versace will be discussed further down the line but assured that “there will be no shortcuts. We need to work on foundations, and we need to be patient.”

He said the group has had the same journey with Miu Miu, in terms of positioning, image and identity, and that took “something like 36 to 48 months to reap the first fruits. So we know it. The acquisition is all about the brand, the image, the creativity, the products, the stores, the people. There will be some synergies, but this is a revenue project. This is a brand project.”

Financials
Chief financial officer Andrea Bonini said Versace is expected to achieve revenues of $810 million in 2024 with an operating profit margin forecast to be high-single-digit negative. The brand operates through a global network of 227 stores.

“Its revenue contribution is very balanced in terms of geographical areas, but also in terms of product categories, between ready-to-wear and leather goods,” he said. The Europe, Middle East and Africa region represents 42 percent of sales, followed by the Americas contributing 31 percent and the Asia-Pacific accounting for 27 percent of the total. Retail accounts for 73 percent of total sales, wholesale for 14 percent and licensing for 13 percent.

Guerra remarked on the two strong Versace licenses, for eyewear with Luxottica, which he signed when he was CEO of that company, and for fragrances with Euroitalia. “They are just great.”

By product, menswear and womenswear are split in a balanced way, and ready-to-wear and leather goods and accessories provide “broadly equal contribution,” he said.

“In the longer term, there will be a more balanced ratio between full price and outlets,” he added.

Bonini presented pro-forma figures for the fiscal year ended December 2024. The transaction projects group revenues at 6.3 billion euros and the operating profit margin would stand at around 20 percent.

First Takes on the Deal
Marco Bizzarri, chairman and investor in Elisabetta Franchi, had been rumored to be keen to buy Versace and on Thursday evening at the inauguration of the Elisabetta Franchi store in Milan, he said he was “happy that Versace did not end up in the hands of a private equity fund, which would have been the end of the brand. Versace needs an industrial platform and Prada has it and it has the skills and expertise to grow the brand.”

Bizzarri has over the years expressed his appreciation for Versace and said he was happy to see it has a future, lamenting how “the Americans did not know how to develop it.”

Bernstein’s Luca Solca said the agreement values Versace at 1.3 times its 2024 sales, which amounted to $1.03 billion in the year ending March 30.

“The acquisition will be EBIT margin dilutive for the group on a pro-forma basis, with management highlighting that sustainable revenue growth rather than a strict focus on cost synergies will be the priority,” Solca said. “Revenue and margins will likely take a hit in the short-term as channel mix is brought closer to that of Prada and Miu Miu, with results expected in the 24- to 48-month horizon.”

He added that a “key test may soon arrive if weaker economic growth places additional pressure on the main Prada and Miu Miu brands, just as management pivots to focus on a Versace turnaround.”

“This is a beautiful and brave operation for the industry in a complicated moment and for the the country, which has lost control of several brands over the years,” said Michele Norsa, special chairman adviser at Ferragamo and former CEO of brands ranging from Valentino to Ferragamo itself. Prada Group “has all the necessary skills and expertise to further grow the brand. I don’t see anything negative in this synergic deal, which allows to cover different customers.”

James Grzinic at Jefferies stated that the acquisition “had caused some investor concern given the length and scale of [Versace’s] underperformance under Capri’s ownership. It is clear that Prada will be much better equipped to support a revival of the historic Italian brand. And yet, we suspect that the debate will continue to revolve around the manner in which a sales-led revival can result in a 200 million euro type EBIT contribution from the Medusa over the longer term.”

Jelena Sokolova, senior equity analyst at Morningstar, said, “Prada purchasing Versace makes sense both financially and in terms of timing. Prada’s profitability and cash position has strengthened in recent years, boosted by its strong brand momentum. This acquisition makes strategic sense since both of these brands pass through fashion cycles and ownership of multiple brands with very different aesthetics — maximalist for Versace and minimalist for Prada and Miu Miu — could help smooth the cyclicality of performance.”

Sokolova touted Prada’s expertise in running luxury brands that Capri Holdings “lacks in comparison. Not to forget that Capri’s performance has been weak as of late and may remain so if economic weakness persists in 2025, as current market turmoil and geopolitical uncertainty suggests. Versace will need investments to reboot the brand, making it an initial drag to Prada’s short-term profitability.”

A luxury goods consultant who requested anonymity said observers should not look back at Prada’s past track record in creating a luxury conglomerate. Patrizio Bertelli bought Helmut Lang and Jil Sander in a 1990s shopping spree but sold both brands in 2006 to focus on Prada and Miu Miu and has candidly admitted the operations did not go as planned and defined them as “mistakes.”

Back then, “the founding designers were still present and active and they imagined they would continue to design with Prada merely around as an investor — but this was not the case. With Versace, it’s not one of the founders that is selling. Also the group now has a more managerial structure that could be more detached and neutral compared to Patrizio Bertelli’s passionate take on business, so I think this time around it could have more chances to succeed. Yes, there are risks, but entrepreneurs need to take risks, too, looking at opportunities to create value,” the consultant said.

Asked about the exit of Donatella Versace, the consultant believes that, while Miuccia Prada has often expressed her respect for the Italian designer, “management must have thought that it would have been unmanageable to be free to make changes with her still in place.”

In 2018, Donatella Versace reached a $2.1 billion deal to sell her family’s company to Michael Kors Holdings, which subsequently changed its name to Capri Holdings.
WWD
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,771
Messages
15,237,056
Members
87,674
Latest member
Poolaz0037
Back
Top