PrinceOfCats
Naturellement pulpeuse
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2003
- Messages
- 10,124
- Reaction score
- 2
Let the commercialization begin?
Are we talking about the same Prada here?
Let the commercialization begin?
I see your point, Acid, but when it comes to revenues and all those financial issues, it`s actually way more profitable to have several houses under the roof of your conglommerate than to have only one. So they might have been successful with using craftsmanship for Prada that was originally developed for the other brands, that were then slowly put away, but financially I don`t think the whole calculation paid off!
You are wrong in several ways. Shareholders are the one's who vote for managment (CEO, CFO, COO, President, VP, etc). They do not affect creative in the sense that they go into the atelier and help drape; but, they do in the sense that splurging millions on new stores, extensive runway or other productions and things like that are taken into account. Also, shoes/bags/fragrance must be profitable enough to make up for the losses of ready-to-wear. Shareholders have EVERY right when it comes to a company because they are the OWNERS of the company.