^Catherine wasn't a teen when she started seeing Michael. The reservations some people have with this relationship isn't due to gender bia, imo.
I don't necessarily think the relationship is unstable or unsatisfactory for the people involved, and maybe they'll have an happily ever after (and even if they don't, most marriage end up in divorce regardless of age-gap); but let's not try to sidetrack the issue of a mature adult having babies with a teen (which is what some people object to) and turn it into a 'girl power' debate.
I don't necessarily think the relationship is unstable or unsatisfactory for the people involved, and maybe they'll have an happily ever after (and even if they don't, most marriage end up in divorce regardless of age-gap); but let's not try to sidetrack the issue of a mature adult having babies with a teen (which is what some people object to) and turn it into a 'girl power' debate.


To me, there are a lot of situations, with particular couples, in which an age difference that big and the younger partner being a teen at the start of the relationship would not seem like an issue. But this couple strikes me as odd in a way I can't really place, and it seems like a lot of other people share that feeling. It's not a general question of good/bad/right/wrong, it's quite specific to these two people.
Also the 'back in the day, 13-year-olds married and it wasn't a big deal' argument is pointless because both of these people were raised in modern society. It wasn't as if 13-year-olds were magically fully mature back then anyway and aren't now; ever seen Coal Miner's Daughter? 

...