Seventeen August 2008 : Blake Lively

[Verene]

Terrible coverS.

And why is she getting all the covers and not Leighton Meester?

 

[lemeray]

She looks terrible...

 

[Madhuri]

I feel like editors are totally trying to make "fetch" happen with Blake. She seems likely a lovely person but her face is not meant for magazine covers. She is not photogenic at all.

 

[Lyle Lanley]

She's usually so pretty ... what happened?!

 

[Suburban Snob]

I feel like editors are totally trying to make "fetch" happen with Blake. She seems likely a lovely person but her face is not meant for magazine covers. She is not photogenic at all.

 

[Ghostkeeper]

She looks so much better in the shoot!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xhu_NVOyix4

 

[Jenna16]

She's old news. Please stop putting her on covers

 

[nyc_art_style]

blake probably has this cover for her new movie for the sisterhood of the traveling pants. she's also been around longer than leighton, and she plays a friendly character on gossip girl instead of the b*tch character leighton plays. therefore a young pre-teen girl (who this magazine is geared toward) will probably buy blake over leighton.

blake is in some desperate need of modeling classes.