If I were the mother, I'd want that man out of my children's lives regardless if he's their father or not.
And no amount of money can make up for a bad influence.
Not defending him, but his behaviour isn't a good reason to keep him away from the children. They're his kids too, and how do we know he isn't a good father? Even if he doesn't seem to be a good husband. It would be wrong to deny the children contact with their father just because the marriage didn't work (unless there is risk to the kids of course). I don't know if Rosetta is doing this or not obviously, but in general, it's always terrible when one parent uses the children against the other parent in separation/divorce cases.
Have Rosetta or Balthazar ever commented on the situation, does anyone know?
Last edited by a moderator: