Snejana Onopka | Page 1020 | the Fashion Spot

Snejana Onopka

k3t643.jpg

geraldlevanchau.com
 
Thanks WS for posting those. I wanted to post them yesterday but thought it would be too much work. I'm a bad fan.

roxana, that pic you posted is so stunning.
 
Those models don't have what she has - a completely flawless face.

calling somebody flawless is subjective just like calling somebody beautiful. Although as a model, isnt it a criteria to be flawless? So depending on who you ask Snejana is not exclusive to the "completely flawless face" category.

anyway ive said my piece and people will have their opinions.
 
A symmetrical face, with smooth and even complexion is objective. Thats what I mean by flawless. I would add to that her jawline, nose, eyes and cheekbones - not everyone would though.
 
calling somebody flawless is subjective just like calling somebody beautiful. Although as a model, isnt it a criteria to be flawless? So depending on who you ask Snejana is not exclusive to the "completely flawless face" category.

anyway ive said my piece and people will have their opinions.
yes thank you, this is snejanas thread so for us, at least for me she's got the most flawless face of all working models today..:flower:

thanks for all beautiful pics everyone! :heart:
 
Snejana, as perfect as she is, would not be where she was if she wasn't unforgettable and unique at the same time. Garbo wasn't versatile. Neither was Dietrich. Some people transcend versatility.

Among models - most supermodels were not versatile, all the way from Lisa Fonssagrives, Twiggy, Dickinson, Paulina P, Cindy and Gisele. They are personalities and great beautities. Nothing more is needed.
 
Snejana, as perfect as she is, would not be where she was if she wasn't unforgettable and unique at the same time. Garbo wasn't versatile. Neither was Dietrich. Some people transcend versatility.

Among models - most supermodels were not versatile, all the way from Lisa Fonssagrives, Twiggy, Dickinson, Paulina P, Cindy and Gisele. They are personalities and great beautities. Nothing more is needed.

I agree. I think 'versatility' is overrated to be honest.
 
^Also having a flawless face is NOT a criteria to be a model. What is a criteria is the height , flaless skin , good hair , a certain it factor/allure [ it doesnt need to be beauty , its a certain quality that is indefinable . For example: there may be a girl that is facially prettier than say amodel but she won't LOOK like a model.. they lack that.. 'amazonian .. 'quality'] and the rest is up to luck really. Thats why theres so many categories for models. The 'edgy' faces.. the 'comemrcial' bodies/faces , the 'etheral' girls , the 'clasically' beautiful .. you know :angel: Snejana is part of the etheral/clasically beautiful category :wub:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
after seeing her numero editorial a million times, i've got amazed by her presence and her beauty. i've always thought she was gorgeous, though never really got interested on her - but now i've completely changed my mind. the girl is truly amazing
 
Last edited by a moderator:
after seeing her numero editorial a million times, i've got amazed by her presence and her beauty. i've always thought she was gorgeous, though never really got interested on her - but now i've completely changed my mind. the girl is truly amazing

Same thing with me. I saw like 4-5 members with the same avatars and I was saying to myself - that ed must be amazing, since it's so popular. And, now I'm here, sharing the same opinion as you. :D :wub:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,177
Messages
15,289,586
Members
89,083
Latest member
SHOOO
Back
Top